Belle Teche Nursing & Rehab Center

Name: Belle Teche Nursing & Rehab Center
Address: 1306 W Admiral Doyle Dr, New Iberia, LA, 70560, US
Telephone: 3373645472

1306 W Admiral Doyle Dr, New Iberia, LA 70560 · Iberia County · 150 certified beds · avg 93 residents/day · certified since Apr 1, 1998

Abuse citation flag (CMS)

Part of chain: CENTRAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY (21 facilities, chain avg rating 2.6★)

The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.

2/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

$8,278

Fines, last 3 years

3.90

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Mar 25, 2026 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

All citations in the current public record (40)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Jun 2, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Jun 2, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint
Mar 25, 2026	▲ G · Actual harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Mar 18, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
May 21, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
May 21, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
May 21, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
May 21, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
May 21, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
May 21, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
May 21, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
May 21, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
May 21, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life.
May 21, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility has more than 120 beds but did not hire a qualified full-time social worker as required.
May 21, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 21, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.
Apr 17, 2024	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Apr 17, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Apr 17, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Apr 2, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Mar 19, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies. · from a complaint
Mar 15, 2023	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Mar 15, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility charged residents' personal funds for items or services that Medicare or Medicaid already pays for. Facilities may not bill residents for covered items.
Mar 15, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Mar 15, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Mar 15, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.
Mar 15, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Mar 15, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Mar 15, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents.
Mar 15, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.
Mar 15, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Mar 15, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Mar 15, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Mar 15, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Mar 15, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Mar 15, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Mar 15, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 15, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
Mar 15, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Mar 15, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not report COVID-19 data to residents and their families as required. Facilities must keep residents and families informed about COVID-19 cases.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 12).

Year	Citations	Serious (G–L)	Worst severity that year
2023	19	0	F
2024	5	0	F
2025	12	0	E
2026	4	1	G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $8,278.

Date	Type	Amount / length
Mar 18, 2026	Fine	$8,278

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	Louisiana avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	3.90	4.04	3.95	bottom 47% in Louisiana; top 44% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.19	0.32	0.69	bottom 26% in Louisiana; bottom 2% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	3.16	3.45	3.50	bottom 35% in Louisiana; bottom 40% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.12	0.20	0.48	bottom 35% in Louisiana; bottom 3% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	47.6	47.6	45.8	bottom 47% in Louisiana; bottom 43% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	0.0	41.6	42.9	top 1% in Louisiana; top 1% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.90, RN 0.19, weekend 3.16. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Kisatchie Health, LLC	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	51%	06/01/1997
Maumalanga, Holly	Individual	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	6%	03/31/2025
Prico, INC	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	49%	06/01/1997
Zimmerman, Freda	Individual	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	12%	03/31/2025
Bolwahnn, Sheila	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2008
Cantrell, Jeffrey Lee	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2013
Central Management Company, LLC	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/1997
Central Management Company, LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	05/23/2025
Kisatchie Health, LLC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	02/01/2001
Maumalanga, Holly	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	03/31/2025
Price, Teddy	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2025
Price, Teddy	Individual	Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	10/01/2025
Price, Teddy	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	03/01/2025
Prico, INC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/1997
Rogers, Dawn	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/1997
Shelton, James	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/1997
Zimmerman, Freda	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	03/31/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
"How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
"What is your nurse and aide staffing ratio on each shift, including nights and weekends?"
"How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
"Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
"What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
"How do you identify and arrange specialized services for residents with mental health conditions or disabilities?"
"Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection
New Iberia Manor North	1.9 mi	New Iberia, LA	★★☆☆☆	2/5
New Iberia Manor South	3.1 mi	New Iberia, LA	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Consolata Rehab and Wellness Center on the Teche	3.9 mi	New Iberia, LA	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Landmark of Acadiana	6.9 mi	Saint Martinville, LA	★★★★☆	4/5
Maison Teche Nursing Center	8.6 mi	Jeanerette, LA	★☆☆☆☆	3/5
Camelot of Broussard	12.2 mi	Broussard, LA	★★★☆☆	3/5
Maison Du Monde Living Center	15.0 mi	Abbeville, LA	★★☆☆☆	3/5
Maison de Lafayette	15.9 mi	Lafayette, LA	★☆☆☆☆	2/5
Eastridge Nursing & Rehabilitation	15.9 mi	Abbeville, LA	★★★☆☆	4/5
Cornerstone at the Ranch	16.1 mi	Lafayette, LA	★☆☆☆☆	2/5
River Oaks Retirement Manor	17.3 mi	Lafayette, LA	★☆☆☆☆	2/5
Pelican Pointe Healthcare and Rehabilitation	17.7 mi	Maurice, LA	★★★★☆	4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in New Iberia →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 195460.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Belle Teche Nursing & Rehab Center

1306 W Admiral Doyle Dr, New Iberia, LA 70560 · 3373645472

Health inspection rating 2/5 · CMS overall 2/5 · ▲ FEDERAL ABUSE CITATION FLAG· Fines (3y): $8,278

Most serious findings on record:

▲ Mar 25, 2026 (F-0600, Actual harm, one-off): The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
☐ "How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
☐ "What is your nurse and aide staffing ratio on each shift, including nights and weekends?"
☐ "How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
☐ "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
☐ "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
☐ "How do you identify and arrange specialized services for residents with mental health conditions or disabilities?"
☐ "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 195460 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)