How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Zachary Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
6161 Main Street, Zachary, LA 70791 (opens Google Maps) · E. Baton Rouge County · (225) 654-6893· 110 certified beds · avg 71 residents/day · certified since May 1, 1996 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: CENTRAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY (21 facilities, chain avg rating 2.6★)
3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Feb 11, 2026
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.49
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 22 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint F-0656
The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint F-0842
The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. F-0641
View all 22 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Mar 11, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| Feb 11, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Feb 11, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Feb 11, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · F-0600 |
| Feb 11, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Feb 11, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Feb 11, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Apr 8, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint · F-0725 |
| Apr 8, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint · F-0558 |
| Jan 8, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records. · F-0851 |
| Jan 8, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Jan 8, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Jan 8, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care. · F-0791 |
| Jan 8, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| Jan 8, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Jul 30, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Feb 21, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Feb 21, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Feb 21, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council. · F-0565 |
| Feb 21, 2024 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint · F-0641 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (6 → 6).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2024
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 8
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 8
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 6 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 8 | 0 | F |
| 2026 | 8 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityLouisiana averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 4.49
Louisiana average: 4.04
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.45
Louisiana average: 0.32
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.93
Louisiana average: 3.45
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Louisiana avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.49 | 4.04 | 3.95 | top 23% in Louisiana; top 23% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.45 | 0.32 | 0.69 | top 11% in Louisiana; bottom 29% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.93 | 3.45 | 3.50 | top 18% in Louisiana; top 25% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.22 | 0.20 | 0.48 | top 20% in Louisiana; bottom 15% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 51.8 | 47.6 | 45.8 | bottom 33% in Louisiana; bottom 32% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 25.0 | 41.6 | 42.9 | top 26% in Louisiana; top 20% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.98, RN 0.40, weekend 3.49.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.98 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Zachary Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kistachie Health, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 52% | 02/01/2008 |
| Maumalanga, Holly | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 6% | 03/31/2025 |
| Prico, INC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 48% | 01/01/2005 |
| Zimmerman, Freda | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 12% | 03/31/2025 |
| Bolwahnn, Sheila | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2008 |
| Cantrell, Jeffrey Lee | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2013 |
| Central Management Company, LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2005 |
| Central Management Company, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/23/2025 |
| Kistachie Health, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2005 |
| Maumalanga, Holly | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/31/2025 |
| Price, Teddy | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2025 |
| Price, Teddy | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/29/2025 |
| Price, Teddy | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2025 |
| Prico, INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2005 |
| Rogers, Dawn | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2005 |
| Shelton, James | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2005 |
| Zimmerman, Freda | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/31/2025 |
All 17 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Central Management Company — 21 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Ascension Oaks Nursing & Rehab Center — Gonzales, LA · overall 4/5
- Autumn Leaves Nursing & Rehab Center, LLC — Winnfield, LA · overall 3/5
- Belle Grande Nursing and Rehabilitation Center — Alexandria, LA · overall 3/5
- Belle Maison Nursing & Rehabilitation Center, LLC — Hammond, LA · overall 3/5
- Belle Teche Nursing & Rehab Center — New Iberia, LA · overall 2/5abuse
- Capital Oaks Nursing & Rehabilitation Center LLC — Baton Rouge, LA · overall 1/5
- Cypress Point Nursing & Rehabilitation Center — Bossier City, LA · overall 4/5
- Forest Haven Nursing & Rehab Ctr, LLC — Jonesboro, LA · overall 3/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 20 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
- "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
- "Can you give me examples of how you adjust daily routines and room setups to fit each resident's preferences?"
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
- "How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 52% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 17 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 30 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Lodge at Lane | 0.3 mi | Zachary, LA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| River Oaks Nursing & Rehabilitation Center LLC | 4.1 mi | Baker, LA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Grace Nursing Home | 5.3 mi | Slaughter, LA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Baton Rouge Health Care Center | 6.3 mi | Baton Rouge, LA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Central Guest House Healthcare & Rehabilitation Ce | 8.8 mi | Baton Rouge, LA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Villa Feliciana Chronic Disease | 12.8 mi | Jackson, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Louisiana War Veterans Home | 12.8 mi | Jackson, LA | ★★★★☆ | 5/5 | |
| St Clare Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation | 13.4 mi | Baton Rouge, LA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Baton Rouge General Medical Center, SNF | 13.8 mi | Baton Rouge, LA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| The Guest House Care Center | 13.9 mi | Baton Rouge, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Capital Oaks Nursing & Rehabilitation Center LLC | 13.9 mi | Baton Rouge, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Mid City Community Nursing and Rehab | 14.0 mi | Baton Rouge, LA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in E. Baton Rouge, LA — 24 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Capitol House Nursing and Rehab Center — Baton Rouge, LA · overall 1/5
- Center Point Health Care and Rehab — Baton Rouge, LA · overall 1/5
- Flannery Oaks Guest House — Baton Rouge, LA · overall 1/5
- Heritage Manor of Baton Rouge II — Baton Rouge, LA · overall 1/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 195362.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).