LouisianaBaton Rouge

Mid City Community Nursing and Rehab

4005 North Blvd., Baton Rouge, LA 70806 · E. Baton Rouge County · 184 certified beds · avg 113 residents/day · certified since Oct 31, 2000

Part of chain: THE CARPENTER HEALTH NETWORK (4 facilities, chain avg rating 2.5★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$44,090
Fines, last 3 years
4.00
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Apr 18, 2024 · F-0600

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: May 24, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (22)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 8, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Apr 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Apr 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Aug 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Mar 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Mar 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Mar 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide timely, quality laboratory tests to meet residents' needs.
Mar 19, 2025C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman.
Feb 11, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Feb 11, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Feb 11, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · from a complaint
Feb 11, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. · from a complaint
Feb 11, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Apr 18, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Apr 18, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Apr 18, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Apr 18, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents.
Apr 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Apr 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Apr 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives.
Apr 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Apr 18, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (4 → 3).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202491G ▲
2025100E
202630E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $44,090, plus 2 Medicare payment denial periods.

DateTypeAmount / length
Feb 11, 2025Payment Denial6 days from Mar 7, 2025
Apr 18, 2024Fine$44,090
Apr 18, 2024Payment Denial8 days from May 16, 2024

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityLouisiana avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.004.043.95top 50% in Louisiana; top 39% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.250.320.69bottom 45% in Louisiana; bottom 5% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.503.453.50top 44% in Louisiana; top 42% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.110.200.48bottom 29% in Louisiana; bottom 2% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)47.747.645.8bottom 46% in Louisiana; bottom 43% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)0.041.642.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.14, RN 0.19, weekend 2.74. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Mitchell, PatrickIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2020
PCM Holdings I, INCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%07/18/2025
PCM Intermediate Holdings LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/18/2025
PCM Rehab Enterprises LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/18/2025
Phoenix SNF Holdings, LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/18/2025
PTM 2018 Family TrustOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/18/2025
St. George LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/18/2025
Holleman, EmilyIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/12/2026
Joseph, ErnestIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/06/2025
Joseph, ErnestIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/06/2025
Mitchell, KellyIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/12/2026
Mitchell, PatrickIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2020
Nnadi, JohnIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/23/2024
Nnadi, JohnIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2024
St. Joseph Holdings LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/12/2026

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Capital Oaks Nursing & Rehabilitation Center LLC0.1 miBaton Rouge, LA★☆☆☆☆2/5
Sterling Place Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center0.1 miBaton Rouge, LA★★★★☆4/5
Baton Rouge General Medical Center, SNF0.4 miBaton Rouge, LA★★★★★5/5
St Clare Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation2.2 miBaton Rouge, LA★★★★☆4/5
St James Place Nursing Care Center3.6 miBaton Rouge, LA★★☆☆☆2/5
Ollie Steele Burden Manor4.0 miBaton Rouge, LA★★☆☆☆3/5
Legacy Nursing and Rehabilitation of Port Allen4.2 miPort Allen, LA★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Center Point Health Care and Rehab4.4 miBaton Rouge, LA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Landmark of Baton Rouge4.5 miBaton Rouge, LA★★★☆☆3/5
Heritage Manor of Baton Rouge II4.5 miBaton Rouge, LA★☆☆☆☆1/5
The Guest House Care Center4.6 miBaton Rouge, LA★☆☆☆☆2/5
Jefferson Manor Nursing and Rehab Ctr, LLC5.2 miBaton Rouge, LA★☆☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Baton Rouge →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 195505.