LouisianaBaton Rouge

St Clare Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation

7435 Bishop Ott Drive, Baton Rouge, LA 70806 · E. Baton Rouge County · 184 certified beds · avg 135 residents/day · certified since Feb 1, 2004

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.95
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (22)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 6, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
May 6, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
May 6, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives.
May 6, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life.
May 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
May 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
May 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
May 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
May 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
May 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life.
May 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 29, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Feb 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · from a complaint
Feb 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · from a complaint
Feb 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Jul 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Jul 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
May 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Apr 3, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not properly inform residents or their representatives about arbitration agreements — contracts that give up the right to sue in court — including their right to refuse to sign.
Apr 3, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a neutral and fair arbitration process. Arbitration is a way of settling disputes outside of court, and if it's used, the facility must agree with the resident on a neutral arbitrator and a convenient location.
Apr 3, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 2, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (8 → 4).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202310E
202460E
2025110D
202640E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityLouisiana avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.954.043.95bottom 48% in Louisiana; top 42% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.160.320.69bottom 13% in Louisiana; bottom 1% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.373.453.50bottom 47% in Louisiana; top 49% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.110.200.48bottom 23% in Louisiana; bottom 2% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)58.347.645.8bottom 21% in Louisiana; bottom 19% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)0.041.642.9

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.60, RN 0.14, weekend 3.07. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
CLF Investments, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest12%07/01/2023
M5 Operations, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest70%07/01/2023
Moody, CharlesIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest70%07/01/2023
Landry, DanicusIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Baton Rouge General Medical Center, SNF1.9 miBaton Rouge, LA★★★★★5/5
Capital Oaks Nursing & Rehabilitation Center LLC2.2 miBaton Rouge, LA★☆☆☆☆2/5
Mid City Community Nursing and Rehab2.2 miBaton Rouge, LA★★★★☆4/5
Sterling Place Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center2.4 miBaton Rouge, LA★★★★☆4/5
The Guest House Care Center2.4 miBaton Rouge, LA★☆☆☆☆2/5
Landmark of Baton Rouge3.3 miBaton Rouge, LA★★★☆☆3/5
Heritage Manor of Baton Rouge II3.3 miBaton Rouge, LA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Capitol House Nursing and Rehab Center3.3 miBaton Rouge, LA★☆☆☆☆3/5
Ollie Steele Burden Manor3.6 miBaton Rouge, LA★★☆☆☆3/5
Jefferson Manor Nursing and Rehab Ctr, LLC4.0 miBaton Rouge, LA★☆☆☆☆1/5
White Oak Post Acute Care4.0 miBaton Rouge, LA—/5SFF
Center Point Health Care and Rehab4.1 miBaton Rouge, LA★☆☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Baton Rouge →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 195590.