LouisianaBaton Rouge

Heritage Manor of Baton Rouge II

9301 Oxford Place Ave, Baton Rouge, LA 70809 · E. Baton Rouge County · 144 certified beds · avg 118 residents/day · certified since Nov 1, 1996

Part of chain: THE BEEBE FAMILY (48 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
6
Serious findings on record
$56,628
Fines, last 3 years
3.78
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Feb 21, 2025 · F-0609 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.

Why it matters: When incidents aren't reported promptly, abusers may continue harming residents and outside authorities can't step in.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Mar 26, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Feb 21, 2025 · F-0656 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.

Why it matters: Without a complete, working care plan, important needs can slip through the cracks and no one is accountable for results.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Mar 26, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Feb 21, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Mar 26, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Feb 21, 2025 · F-0835 · triggered by a complaint

The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents.

Why it matters: Poor administration often shows up as understaffing, supply shortages, and care problems across the whole facility.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Mar 26, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Oct 18, 2023 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Oct 14, 2023 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Oct 18, 2023 · F-0609 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.

Why it matters: When incidents aren't reported promptly, abusers may continue harming residents and outside authorities can't step in.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Oct 14, 2023 (Past Non-Compliance)

All citations in the current public record (32)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 5, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Mar 5, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Mar 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment.
Mar 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Dec 9, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Mar 19, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Feb 21, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Feb 21, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Feb 21, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Feb 21, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. · from a complaint
Feb 21, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint
Feb 21, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · from a complaint
Dec 11, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Dec 11, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from.
Dec 11, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Dec 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Dec 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Oct 30, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Sep 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility transferred or discharged a resident without a valid reason, or failed to provide the required documentation and information when moving a resident out. · from a complaint
Sep 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · from a complaint
Sep 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · from a complaint
Aug 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Aug 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Aug 2, 2024C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · from a complaint
Nov 8, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Nov 8, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Nov 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Nov 8, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Oct 18, 2023▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Oct 18, 2023▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Aug 29, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Aug 29, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (5 → 4).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202382J ▲
2024120E
202584J ▲
202640E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

3 fines totaling $56,628.

DateTypeAmount / length
Feb 21, 2025Fine$27,586
Oct 18, 2023Fine$14,521
Oct 18, 2023Fine$14,521

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityLouisiana avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.784.043.95bottom 39% in Louisiana; top 49% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.150.320.69bottom 13% in Louisiana; bottom 1% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.363.453.50bottom 46% in Louisiana; top 50% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.120.200.48bottom 32% in Louisiana; bottom 2% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)60.747.645.8bottom 16% in Louisiana; bottom 15% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)33.341.642.9top 34% in Louisiana; top 33% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.56, RN 0.15, weekend 3.16. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Act Investments, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest15%01/01/2010
David & Felicia Stallard Child TrOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest5%01/01/2010
Elton Glynn Beebe Jr. & Nancy Doty Beebe Irrv Tr UaOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest5%01/01/2010
Gerard and Alison Danos Childrens TrOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest01/01/2010
Joseph & Alison Sadler Children TrOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest01/01/2010
Medico LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest85%01/01/2010
Account Management Services INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2010
Account Management Services INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2010
Administrative Systems INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2010
Administrative Systems INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2010
Alisons 2016 Fam Tr No 2OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Aria Care Management LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2022
Baton Rouge Heritage House LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Beebe 2013 Childrens Tr NGOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Beebe, BobbyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/11/2021
Beebe, BobbyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/11/2021
Beebe, EltonIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2010
Casteel, NicholasIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/30/2022
Casteel, NicholasIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/30/2022
Diagre Devare, DeskamekaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/12/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Landmark of Baton Rouge0.0 miBaton Rouge, LA★★★☆☆3/5
Jefferson Manor Nursing and Rehab Ctr, LLC0.7 miBaton Rouge, LA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Ollie Steele Burden Manor1.5 miBaton Rouge, LA★★☆☆☆3/5
White Oak Post Acute Care1.6 miBaton Rouge, LA—/5SFF
Center Point Health Care and Rehab1.8 miBaton Rouge, LA★☆☆☆☆1/5
The Guest House Care Center2.7 miBaton Rouge, LA★☆☆☆☆2/5
Capitol House Nursing and Rehab Center3.1 miBaton Rouge, LA★☆☆☆☆3/5
St Clare Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation3.3 miBaton Rouge, LA★★★★☆4/5
The Woodleigh of Baton Rouge3.9 miBaton Rouge, LA★★★☆☆3/5
Pines Retirement Center of Baton Rouge4.1 miBaton Rouge, LA★☆☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Baton Rouge →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 195389.