Zachary Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
6161 Main Street, Zachary, LA 70791 · E. Baton Rouge County · 110 certified beds · avg 71 residents/day · certified since May 1, 1996
Part of chain: CENTRAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY (21 facilities, chain avg rating 2.6★)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
All citations in the current public record (22)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint |
| Mar 11, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint |
| Feb 11, 2026 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. |
| Feb 11, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. |
| Feb 11, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. |
| Feb 11, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. |
| Feb 11, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. |
| Feb 11, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Apr 8, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint |
| Apr 8, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint |
| Jan 8, 2025 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records. |
| Jan 8, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. |
| Jan 8, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. |
| Jan 8, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care. |
| Jan 8, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint |
| Jan 8, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Jul 30, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint |
| Jul 30, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Feb 21, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. |
| Feb 21, 2024 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. |
| Feb 21, 2024 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council. |
| Feb 21, 2024 | B · Minimal risk, repeated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (6 → 6).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 6 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 8 | 0 | F |
| 2026 | 8 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Louisiana avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.49 | 4.04 | 3.95 | top 23% in Louisiana; top 23% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.45 | 0.32 | 0.69 | top 11% in Louisiana; bottom 29% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.93 | 3.45 | 3.50 | top 18% in Louisiana; top 25% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.22 | 0.20 | 0.48 | top 20% in Louisiana; bottom 15% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 51.8 | 47.6 | 45.8 | bottom 33% in Louisiana; bottom 32% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 25.0 | 41.6 | 42.9 | top 26% in Louisiana; top 20% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.98, RN 0.40, weekend 3.49. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kistachie Health, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 52% | 02/01/2008 |
| Maumalanga, Holly | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 6% | 03/31/2025 |
| Prico, INC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 48% | 01/01/2005 |
| Zimmerman, Freda | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 12% | 03/31/2025 |
| Bolwahnn, Sheila | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/01/2008 |
| Cantrell, Jeffrey Lee | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2013 |
| Central Management Company, LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2005 |
| Central Management Company, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/23/2025 |
| Kistachie Health, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2005 |
| Maumalanga, Holly | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/31/2025 |
| Price, Teddy | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2025 |
| Price, Teddy | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/29/2025 |
| Price, Teddy | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2025 |
| Prico, INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2005 |
| Rogers, Dawn | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2005 |
| Shelton, James | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2005 |
| Zimmerman, Freda | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/31/2025 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
- "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
- "Can you give me examples of how you adjust daily routines and room setups to fit each resident's preferences?"
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
- "How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Lodge at Lane | 0.3 mi | Zachary, LA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| River Oaks Nursing & Rehabilitation Center LLC | 4.1 mi | Baker, LA | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Grace Nursing Home | 5.3 mi | Slaughter, LA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Baton Rouge Health Care Center | 6.3 mi | Baton Rouge, LA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Central Guest House Healthcare & Rehabilitation Ce | 8.8 mi | Baton Rouge, LA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Villa Feliciana Chronic Disease | 12.8 mi | Jackson, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Louisiana War Veterans Home | 12.8 mi | Jackson, LA | ★★★★☆ | 5/5 | |
| St Clare Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation | 13.4 mi | Baton Rouge, LA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Baton Rouge General Medical Center, SNF | 13.8 mi | Baton Rouge, LA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| The Guest House Care Center | 13.9 mi | Baton Rouge, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Capital Oaks Nursing & Rehabilitation Center LLC | 13.9 mi | Baton Rouge, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Mid City Community Nursing and Rehab | 14.0 mi | Baton Rouge, LA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 195362.