FloridaSaint Petersburg

Westminster Suncoast

1095 Pinellas Point Dr S, Saint Petersburg, FL 33705 · Pinellas County · 120 certified beds · avg 89 residents/day · certified since Aug 23, 1996

Abuse citation flag (CMS)

Part of chain: WESTMINSTER COMMUNITIES OF FLORIDA (9 facilities, chain avg rating 4.3★)

The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.90
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (21)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Feb 25, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Feb 25, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Feb 25, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint
Feb 25, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Feb 25, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Nov 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Nov 12, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Apr 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Apr 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Apr 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Apr 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Apr 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from.
Apr 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.
Feb 16, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Feb 16, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Feb 16, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Feb 16, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Feb 16, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide timely, quality laboratory tests to meet residents' needs.
Nov 19, 2020E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Nov 19, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Nov 19, 2020D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (5 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202030E
202250E
202480D
202650E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityFlorida avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.904.033.95top 48% in Florida; top 44% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.880.760.69top 28% in Florida; top 22% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.543.683.50top 49% in Florida; top 40% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.590.530.48top 31% in Florida; top 23% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)35.041.445.8top 33% in Florida; top 24% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)40.046.042.9top 38% in Florida; top 46% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.67, RN 0.83, weekend 3.33. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Brunner, JasonIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/08/2015
Brunner, JasonIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/16/2025
Doddridge, DonaldIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2025
Faubel, MeganIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Hennis, GarryIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Keith, HenryIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/23/2005
Keith, HenryIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2024
Prawer, AdamIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2014
Prawer, AdamIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/17/2025
Westminster Services INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2001

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Pinellas Point Nursing and Rehab Center1.9 miSaint Petersburg, FL★★☆☆☆1/5
Bay Pointe Nursing Pavilion2.4 miSaint Petersburg, FL★★★★☆3/5
Addington Place at College Harbor2.9 miSaint Petersburg, FL★★★★★4/5
South Heritage Health & Rehabilitation Center3.0 miSaint Petersburg, FL★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Alpine Health and Rehabilitation Center3.7 miSaint Petersburg, FL★☆☆☆☆1/5
Bayside Care Center5.2 miSaint Petersburg, FL★★★☆☆3/5
Apollo Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center5.4 miSaint Petersburg, FL★★★☆☆2/5
Boca Ciega Center5.4 miGulfport, FL★☆☆☆☆1/5
North Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center5.5 miSaint Petersburg, FL★★★★☆3/5
Concordia Manor5.5 miSaint Petersburg, FL★☆☆☆☆1/5abuseSFF
Golfview Nursing Center5.8 miSaint Petersburg, FL★★☆☆☆3/5
Springs at Boca Ciega Bay5.9 miSouth Pasadena, FL★★☆☆☆1/5abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Saint Petersburg →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 105926.