How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Westminster Suncoast
1095 Pinellas Point Dr S, Saint Petersburg, FL 33705 (opens Google Maps) · Pinellas County · (727) 867-1131· 120 certified beds · avg 89 residents/day · certified since Aug 23, 1996 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Abuse citation flag (CMS)
Part of chain: WESTMINSTER COMMUNITIES OF FLORIDA (9 facilities, chain avg rating 4.3★)
The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.
2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Apr 25, 2024
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.90
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →
⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 21 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint F-0684
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint F-0600
The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint F-0761
View all 21 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Feb 25, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Feb 25, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint · F-0761 |
| Feb 25, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint · F-0842 |
| Feb 25, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint · F-0880 |
| Nov 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Nov 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Apr 25, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Apr 25, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Apr 25, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Apr 25, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
| Apr 25, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from. · F-0699 |
| Apr 25, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · F-0726 |
| Feb 16, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Feb 16, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Feb 16, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Feb 16, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Feb 16, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide timely, quality laboratory tests to meet residents' needs. · F-0770 |
| Nov 19, 2020 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Nov 19, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Nov 19, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · F-0921 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (5 → 6).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2020
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2022
All citations: 5
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 8
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 5
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 3 | 0 | E |
| 2022 | 5 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 8 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 5 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityFlorida averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.90
Florida average: 4.03
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.88
Florida average: 0.76
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.54
Florida average: 3.68
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Florida avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.90 | 4.03 | 3.95 | top 48% in Florida; top 44% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.88 | 0.76 | 0.69 | top 28% in Florida; top 22% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.54 | 3.68 | 3.50 | top 49% in Florida; top 40% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.59 | 0.53 | 0.48 | top 31% in Florida; top 23% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 35.0 | 41.4 | 45.8 | top 33% in Florida; top 24% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 40.0 | 46.0 | 42.9 | top 38% in Florida; top 46% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.67, RN 0.83, weekend 3.33.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.67 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Westminster Suncoast. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brunner, Jason | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/08/2015 |
| Brunner, Jason | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/16/2025 |
| Doddridge, Donald | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Faubel, Megan | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| Hennis, Garry | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| Keith, Henry | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/23/2005 |
| Keith, Henry | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| Prawer, Adam | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2014 |
| Prawer, Adam | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/17/2025 |
| Westminster Services INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2001 |
All 10 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Westminster Communities of Florida — 9 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Westminster Towers — Orlando, FL · overall 3/5
- Westminster Winter Park — Winter Park, FL · overall 5/5
- Westminster Woods on Julington Creek — Jacksonville, FL · overall 5/5
- Florida Presbyterian Homes INC — Lakeland, FL · overall 5/5
- Westminster Baldwin Park — Orlando, FL · overall 5/5
- Westminster Oaks — Tallahassee, FL · overall 5/5
- Westminster Point Pleasant — Bradenton, FL · overall 4/5
- Westminster St Augustine — Saint Augustine, FL · overall 5/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
- "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
- "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 35% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 64 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pinellas Point Nursing and Rehab Center | 1.9 mi | Saint Petersburg, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Bay Pointe Nursing Pavilion | 2.4 mi | Saint Petersburg, FL | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Addington Place at College Harbor | 2.9 mi | Saint Petersburg, FL | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| South Heritage Health & Rehabilitation Center | 3.0 mi | Saint Petersburg, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Alpine Health and Rehabilitation Center | 3.7 mi | Saint Petersburg, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Bayside Care Center | 5.2 mi | Saint Petersburg, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Apollo Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center | 5.4 mi | Saint Petersburg, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Boca Ciega Center | 5.4 mi | Gulfport, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| North Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center | 5.5 mi | Saint Petersburg, FL | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Concordia Manor | 5.5 mi | Saint Petersburg, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| Golfview Nursing Center | 5.8 mi | Saint Petersburg, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Springs at Boca Ciega Bay | 5.9 mi | South Pasadena, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Pinellas, FL — 65 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Willowbrooke Court Skilled Care Center at Mease Li — Dunedin, FL · overall 5/5
- Wrights Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center — Seminole, FL · overall 4/5
- Abbey Rehabilitation and Nursing Center — Saint Petersburg, FL · overall 1/5
- Advanced Care Center — Clearwater, FL · overall 4/5
- Alhambra Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center — Saint Petersburg, FL · overall 1/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 105926.