How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Apollo Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center
1000 24th St N, Saint Petersburg, FL 33713 (opens Google Maps) · Pinellas County · (727) 323-4711· 99 certified beds · avg 93 residents/day · certified since Mar 16, 1982 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: GOLD FL TRUST II (36 facilities, chain avg rating 3.4★)
2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Jun 28, 2024
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.66
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 18 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · from a complaint F-0804
The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. F-0657
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
View all 18 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · from a complaint · F-0804 |
| Jun 28, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Jun 28, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jun 28, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jun 28, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · F-0585 |
| Jun 28, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Jun 28, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Jun 28, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · F-0814 |
| May 5, 2022 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| May 5, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| May 5, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · F-0585 |
| May 5, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655 |
| May 5, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| May 5, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
| May 5, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757 |
| Dec 16, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Dec 16, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Dec 16, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (7 → 7).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2020
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2022
All citations: 7
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 7
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 3 | 0 | D |
| 2022 | 7 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 7 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 1 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityFlorida averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.66
Florida average: 4.03
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.53
Florida average: 0.76
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.48
Florida average: 3.68
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Florida avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.66 | 4.03 | 3.95 | bottom 29% in Florida; bottom 44% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.53 | 0.76 | 0.69 | bottom 27% in Florida; bottom 42% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.48 | 3.68 | 3.50 | bottom 44% in Florida; top 43% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.36 | 0.53 | 0.48 | bottom 34% in Florida; bottom 45% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 44.6 | 41.4 | 45.8 | bottom 42% in Florida; top 49% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 22.2 | 46.0 | 42.9 | top 11% in Florida; top 17% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.35, RN 0.48, weekend 3.18.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.35 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Apollo Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apollo SNF Holdco LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 03/23/2022 |
| FL Master Opco Holdco LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 07/27/2022 |
| Edelmann, Christopher | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/27/2022 |
| Shelby, Jack | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/27/2022 |
All 4 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Gold FL Trust II — 36 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Carlton Shores Healthcare and Rehabilitation Cente — Daytona Beach, FL · overall 5/5
- Club Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center at the V — The Villages, FL · overall 3/5
- Cypress Care Center — Wildwood, FL · overall 2/5
- Gardens Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center — Daytona Beach, FL · overall 5/5
- Greenbriar Healthcare Rehabilitation and Nursing C — Bradenton, FL · overall 3/5
- Grove Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center and Reh — Hernando, FL · overall 3/5
- Isle Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center — Orange Park, FL · overall 5/5
- Kendall Lakes Healthcare and Rehab Center — Miami, FL · overall 5/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 35 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Could I join residents for a meal to see the food quality and temperature for myself?"
- "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "Walk me through what happens when a resident or family files a grievance — who responds and how fast?"
- "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
- "What do you do daily to keep residents moving, and how do you help residents at risk of losing mobility?"
- "Can I see where garbage is stored and how often it's removed?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Florida midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 45% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 72 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center | 0.7 mi | Saint Petersburg, FL | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Bayside Care Center | 1.0 mi | Saint Petersburg, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Golfview Nursing Center | 1.1 mi | Saint Petersburg, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Concordia Manor | 1.7 mi | Saint Petersburg, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuseSFF |
| Alpine Health and Rehabilitation Center | 2.4 mi | Saint Petersburg, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| South Heritage Health & Rehabilitation Center | 2.6 mi | Saint Petersburg, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Vivo Healthcare Laurellwood | 3.0 mi | Saint Petersburg, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Marion and Bernard L Samson Nursing Center | 3.0 mi | Saint Petersburg, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Boca Ciega Center | 3.5 mi | Gulfport, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Egret Cove Center | 3.5 mi | Saint Petersburg, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Bay Pointe Nursing Pavilion | 3.6 mi | Saint Petersburg, FL | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Springs at Boca Ciega Bay | 3.8 mi | South Pasadena, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Pinellas, FL — 65 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Aventura at the Bay — Saint Petersburg, FL · overall —/5abuseSFF
- Aviata at Bryan Dairy — Largo, FL · overall 1/5abuse
- Aviata at Countryside — Palm Harbor, FL · overall 3/5
- Aviata at Lakeside Oaks — Dunedin, FL · overall 2/5
- Aviata at Oldsmar — Oldsmar, FL · overall 1/5
- Aviata at Sand Key — Clearwater, FL · overall 2/5
- Aviata at Seminole — Seminole, FL · overall 1/5
- Aviata at the Harbor — Safety Harbor, FL · overall 2/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 105202.