FloridaSeminole

Wrights Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center

11300 110th Ave N, Seminole, FL 33778 · Pinellas County · 60 certified beds · avg 50 residents/day · certified since Dec 16, 1993

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$34,333
Fines, last 3 years
3.54
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Nov 12, 2024 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Dec 12, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (14)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jan 22, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jan 22, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Jan 22, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Nov 12, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Sep 20, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Sep 20, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Sep 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Sep 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential.
Sep 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Sep 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Sep 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Sep 20, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council. · from a complaint
Sep 10, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Sep 10, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 3).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202120D
202380E
202411G ▲
202630E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $34,333.

DateTypeAmount / length
Nov 12, 2024Fine$34,333

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityFlorida avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.544.033.95bottom 18% in Florida; bottom 38% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.490.760.69bottom 21% in Florida; bottom 36% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.293.683.50bottom 21% in Florida; bottom 47% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.400.530.48bottom 40% in Florida; top 49% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)51.041.445.8bottom 26% in Florida; bottom 34% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)44.446.042.9top 47% in Florida; bottom 45% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.45, RN 0.47, weekend 3.21. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Graham, BradIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest20%09/15/2022
Hollenbeck, DanielIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest20%09/25/2022
Rockefeller, KevinIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest60%09/15/2022
Graham, BradIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2023

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Aviata at Bryan Dairy1.9 miLargo, FL★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Palm Garden of Largo2.0 miLargo, FL★★☆☆☆1/5abuse
Palm Garden of Pinellas2.1 miLargo, FL★☆☆☆☆1/5
Freedom Square Health Care Center2.2 miSeminole, FL★★★☆☆3/5
Oak Manor Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center2.7 miLargo, FL★★★★☆3/5
Aviata at Seminole2.8 miSeminole, FL★☆☆☆☆1/5
Sabal Palms Health & Rehabilitation3.1 miLargo, FL★★☆☆☆2/5
Tierra Pines Center3.7 miLargo, FL★★☆☆☆3/5
Gulf Shore Care Center4.0 miPinellas Park, FL★★★☆☆3/5
Belleair Health Care Center4.3 miClearwater, FL★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Seminole →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 105849.