How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
122 Palmers Hill Rd, Stamford, CT 06902 (opens Google Maps) · Western Ct County · (203) 580-6348· 46 certified beds · avg 40 residents/day · certified since Apr 13, 2000 · Medicare only — not Medicaid certified
Certified for Medicare only. Medicare pays for short rehabilitation stays, not for long-term care — and this facility cannot bill Medicaid, which is what most families rely on for a long stay. Ask what a long-term stay here would cost and how it would be paid for. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 5 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. F-0842
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
The facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes. · from a complaint F-0678
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Feb 10, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Mar 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes. · from a complaint · F-0678 |
| May 29, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jan 6, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (1 → 2).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 1 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 2 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Connecticut avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 5.10 | 3.80 | 3.95 | top 9% in Connecticut; top 12% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.50 | 0.70 | 0.69 | top 6% in Connecticut; top 5% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.41 | 3.43 | 3.50 | top 10% in Connecticut; top 13% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.98 | 0.46 | 0.48 | top 5% in Connecticut; top 6% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 20.4 | 37.4 | 45.8 | top 4% in Connecticut; top 3% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 37.5 | 38.6 | 42.9 | top 46% in Connecticut; top 42% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.17, RN 1.52, weekend 4.48.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (5.17 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Edgehill Health Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Regional context: $525.78/day — Connecticut statewide average for a semi-private nursing-facility room, September 30, 2025. This is a historical regional figure, not this facility's price or a prediction. View the OPM source.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B-Ix Capital LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 07/01/2012 |
| B-Ix Edgehill LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 06/30/2011 |
| Benchmark Investments Ix LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 07/01/2012 |
| BSL Friends and Family Fund LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 08/23/2019 |
| KFH Healthcare Fund Investor LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 07/01/2012 |
| KFH Healthcare Usco One INC. | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 07/01/2012 |
| KFH Healthcare Usco Three INC. | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 05/20/2016 |
| Us Healthcare Venture, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 07/01/2012 |
| Benchmark Senior Living LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2012 |
| Danaher, Brian | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/12/2017 |
| Grape, Thomas | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/14/2011 |
| Grape, Thomas | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/14/2011 |
| Mallozzi, Angelo | Individual | Contracted Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/19/2003 |
| Massaro, Christopher | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/21/2021 |
All 14 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ark Healthcare & Rehabilitation at St. Camillus | 2.1 mi | Stamford, CT | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Civita Care Center at Long Ridge | 2.3 mi | Stamford, CT | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Stamford Care Center | 2.6 mi | Stamford, CT | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Nathaniel Witherell, the | 3.1 mi | Greenwich, CT | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Villa at Stamford, the | 5.5 mi | Stamford, CT | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| King Street Home INC | 6.0 mi | Port Chester, NY | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Waveny Care Center | 6.0 mi | New Canaan, CT | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Greenwich Woods Rehabilitation | 6.7 mi | Greenwich, CT | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| The Enclave at Rye Rehab and Nursing Ctr | 7.5 mi | Port Chester, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Norwalk Care Center | 8.3 mi | Norwalk, CT | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Notre Dame Health and Rehabilitation Center | 9.3 mi | Norwalk, CT | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| The Osborn | 9.6 mi | Rye, NY | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Western Ct, CT — 20 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 075421.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details