ConnecticutStamford

Civita Care Center at Long Ridge

710 Long Ridge Road, Stamford, CT 06902 · Western Ct County · 120 certified beds · avg 116 residents/day · certified since Nov 17, 1993

Abuse citation flag (CMS)

Part of chain: CIVITA CARE CENTERS (6 facilities, chain avg rating 2.0★)

The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.67
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (28)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 8, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Jul 22, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jul 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
Jul 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Jul 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Jul 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay).
Jul 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jul 22, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
May 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Sep 26, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Sep 26, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Sep 26, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Sep 26, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Sep 26, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Sep 26, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.
Sep 26, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Sep 26, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Sep 26, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Sep 26, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Sep 26, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Sep 26, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Sep 26, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Sep 26, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Sep 26, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide special eating equipment and utensils — like adaptive cups or easy-grip silverware — for residents who need them, along with appropriate help at meals.
Sep 26, 2023B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Sep 26, 2023B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Aug 10, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Aug 10, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (17 → 7).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202120D
2023170E
202410D
202570E
202610D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityConnecticut avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.673.803.95bottom 49% in Connecticut; bottom 45% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.720.700.69top 31% in Connecticut; top 34% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.273.433.50bottom 43% in Connecticut; bottom 45% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.410.460.48top 47% in Connecticut; top 47% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)24.737.445.8top 14% in Connecticut; top 7% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)38.938.642.9bottom 49% in Connecticut; top 45% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.76, RN 0.74, weekend 3.35. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Ct6 Opco Holdco LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%10/01/2024
Esnh LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10/01/2024
JPNH LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10/01/2024
Pepper, YehudaIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10/01/2024
Schwarcz, ElliotIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10/01/2024
710 Long Ridge LLCOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2024
710 Long Ridge LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/10/2025
Antipuesto, CrisIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2024
Antipuesto, CrisIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/10/2025
Ct6 Opco Holdco LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2024
Ct6 Propco Holdco LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/10/2025
Esnh LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/15/2025
Everflow Healthcare LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/10/2025
Friedman, SamuelIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2024
Fusco, MichaelIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/10/2025
JPNH LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/15/2025
Pepper, YehudaIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2024
Pepper, YehudaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2024
Pepper, YehudaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2024
Schwarcz, ElliotIndividual5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Edgehill Health Center2.3 miStamford, CT★★★★★5/5
Villa at Stamford, the3.2 miStamford, CT★★★★☆4/5
Stamford Care Center3.4 miStamford, CT★★☆☆☆2/5
Ark Healthcare & Rehabilitation at St. Camillus3.5 miStamford, CT★★★★☆4/5
Nathaniel Witherell, the4.0 miGreenwich, CT★★☆☆☆1/5
Waveny Care Center4.3 miNew Canaan, CT★★★★★5/5
Greenwich Woods Rehabilitation7.2 miGreenwich, CT★☆☆☆☆1/5
King Street Home INC7.3 miPort Chester, NY★★☆☆☆2/5
Norwalk Care Center7.4 miNorwalk, CT★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Notre Dame Health and Rehabilitation Center8.2 miNorwalk, CT★★★★☆4/5
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Norwalk8.4 miNorwalk, CT★★☆☆☆2/5
The Enclave at Rye Rehab and Nursing Ctr9.1 miPort Chester, NY★★★★★4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Stamford →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 075394.