How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
3 Farm Road, New Canaan, CT 06840 (opens Google Maps) · Western Ct County · (203) 594-5200· 106 certified beds · avg 70 residents/day · certified since Oct 1, 1991 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 15 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. F-0550
The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. F-0578
The facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint F-0602
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Nov 18, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Nov 18, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint · F-0602 |
| Nov 18, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Nov 18, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Nov 18, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. · F-0883 |
| Nov 18, 2025 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · F-0628 |
| Jan 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint · F-0580 |
| Jan 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | When a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care. · from a complaint · F-0661 |
| Jan 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Jan 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Jan 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Jan 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Jan 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Sep 21, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (7 → 7).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 7 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 7 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Connecticut avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.59 | 3.80 | 3.95 | top 16% in Connecticut; top 21% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 1.21 | 0.70 | 0.69 | top 9% in Connecticut; top 9% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.01 | 3.43 | 3.50 | top 18% in Connecticut; top 23% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.85 | 0.46 | 0.48 | top 8% in Connecticut; top 10% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 37.4 | 37.4 | 45.8 | bottom 48% in Connecticut; top 30% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 4.8 | 38.6 | 42.9 | top 1% in Connecticut; top 2% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.03, RN 1.33, weekend 4.39.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (5.03 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 5/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Waveny Care Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Regional context: $525.78/day — Connecticut statewide average for a semi-private nursing-facility room, September 30, 2025. This is a historical regional figure, not this facility's price or a prediction. View the OPM source.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
Non profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ayen, Mark | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Baldwin, Kenneth | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Barksdale, Russell | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2018 |
| Barksdale, Russell | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/01/2018 |
| Blair, Marian | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Dewaele, Mark | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| Diteodoro, Jack | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2020 |
| Diteodoro, Jack | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/12/2026 |
| Franco, Mary | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2020 |
| Karl, Leo | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2018 |
| Kazmierczak, Stephanie | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/24/2023 |
| Lanard, Rose | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| Lanaway, Janet | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| Perez, Nancy | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2021 |
| Reiss, Paul | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2023 |
| Rose, Charles | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/20/2023 |
| Rose, Charles | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/20/2023 |
| Ruszkowski, Jaime | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| Sautkulis, Jill | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2021 |
| Schiano, Benjamin | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/11/2024 |
Showing 20 of 25 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 5 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Villa at Stamford, the | 3.6 mi | Stamford, CT | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Norwalk Care Center | 3.9 mi | Norwalk, CT | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Notre Dame Health and Rehabilitation Center | 4.2 mi | Norwalk, CT | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Autumn Lake Healthcare at Norwalk | 4.2 mi | Norwalk, CT | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Civita Care Center at Long Ridge | 4.3 mi | Stamford, CT | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Stamford Care Center | 4.8 mi | Stamford, CT | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Ark Healthcare & Rehabilitation at St. Camillus | 5.7 mi | Stamford, CT | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Edgehill Health Center | 6.0 mi | Stamford, CT | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Wilton Meadows Health Care Center | 6.0 mi | Wilton, CT | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Nathaniel Witherell, the | 8.3 mi | Greenwich, CT | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Ridge Crest at Meadow Ridge | 9.9 mi | West Redding, CT | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Southport Center for Nursing & Rehabilitation LLC | 10.8 mi | Southport, CT | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Western Ct, CT — 20 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 075361.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details