King Street Home INC

Name: King Street Home INC
Address: 787 King Street, Port Chester, NY, 10573, US
Telephone: 9149375800

787 King Street, Port Chester, NY 10573 · Westchester County · 120 certified beds · avg 65 residents/day · certified since Jul 1, 1975

2/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

Fines, last 3 years

4.79

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (30)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Mar 30, 2026	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Mar 30, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not make sure a transfer or discharge met the resident's needs and preferences, or did not properly prepare the resident to leave safely. · from a complaint
Mar 30, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · from a complaint
Apr 18, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Apr 18, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not let a resident or their legal representative see or buy copies of the resident's own records. · from a complaint
Apr 18, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not post the names, addresses, and phone numbers of state agencies and advocacy groups, along with a notice that residents may file complaints with the state survey agency. · from a complaint
Apr 18, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not make its inspection results easy for residents to see, or made it hard for residents to contact advocacy agencies like the ombudsman. · from a complaint
Apr 18, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · from a complaint
Apr 18, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · from a complaint
Apr 18, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint
Apr 18, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Apr 18, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint
Jan 11, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment.
Jan 11, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jan 11, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Jan 11, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave.
Jan 11, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Jan 11, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Jan 11, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Jan 11, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required.
Nov 12, 2020	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not let a resident help develop and carry out their own plan of care — the written roadmap of the services and support they'll receive, built around their personal goals and preferences.
Nov 12, 2020	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Nov 12, 2020	B · Minimal risk, repeated	The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
Nov 12, 2020	B · Minimal risk, repeated	The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave.
Nov 21, 2018	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 21, 2018	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Nov 21, 2018	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Nov 21, 2018	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Nov 21, 2018	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Nov 21, 2018	B · Minimal risk, repeated	The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 8).

Year	Citations	Worst severity that year
2018	6	F
2020	4	D
2024	8	E
2025	9	E
2026	3	E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	New York avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	4.79	3.58	3.95	top 8% in New York; top 17% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.75	0.68	0.69	top 27% in New York; top 32% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	4.71	3.13	3.50	top 3% in New York; top 9% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.48	0.48	0.48	top 31% in New York; top 36% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	48.0	40.3	45.8	bottom 31% in New York; bottom 42% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	46.2	39.8	42.9	bottom 32% in New York; bottom 42% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.06, RN 0.79, weekend 4.98. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 3/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Logan, Joan	Individual	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	50%	01/23/2004
Wilner, Robert	Individual	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	50%	01/23/2004
Borzykowski, Jennifer	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	11/01/2020
Borzykowski, Jennifer	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	03/19/2025
Logan, Joan	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	01/23/2004
Logan, Joan	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	01/22/2025
Riddle, Albert	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2013
Riddle, Albert	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	03/19/2025
Wilner, Robert	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	01/23/2004
Wilner, Robert	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	01/22/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
"Before a resident is discharged or transferred, how do you make sure the new place can actually meet their needs?"
"What written notices do we get before any transfer or discharge, and what is your bed-hold policy?"
"What systems do you use to prevent medication errors, and what happens when one occurs?"
"If I ask for a copy of my family member's records, how quickly will I get them and what does it cost?"
"Where do you post the contact information for the state agency and the ombudsman, in case we ever need to file a complaint?"
"Where do you post your latest state inspection results and the ombudsman's contact information?"
"How do you protect residents' privacy, both in their medical records and in day-to-day care?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection
The Enclave at Rye Rehab and Nursing Ctr	2.4 mi	Port Chester, NY	★★★★★	4/5
Greenwich Woods Rehabilitation	2.4 mi	Greenwich, CT	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Nathaniel Witherell, the	3.3 mi	Greenwich, CT	★★☆☆☆	1/5
The Osborn	4.4 mi	Rye, NY	★★★★☆	3/5
Epic Rehabilitation and Nursing at White Plains	5.1 mi	White Plains, NY	★★★☆☆	2/5
White Plains Center for Nursing Care, L L C	5.6 mi	White Plains, NY	★★★★★	3/5
Martine Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing	5.6 mi	White Plains, NY	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Edgehill Health Center	6.0 mi	Stamford, CT	★★★★★	5/5
Sarah Neuman Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing	6.9 mi	Mamaroneck, NY	★★☆☆☆	1/5
The Knolls	6.9 mi	Valhalla, NY	★★★★★	5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Port Chester →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335447.

The Care File

Visit checklist — King Street Home INC

787 King Street, Port Chester, NY 10573 · 9149375800

Health inspection rating 2/5 · CMS overall 2/5· Fines (3y): $0

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
☐ "Before a resident is discharged or transferred, how do you make sure the new place can actually meet their needs?"
☐ "What written notices do we get before any transfer or discharge, and what is your bed-hold policy?"
☐ "What systems do you use to prevent medication errors, and what happens when one occurs?"
☐ "If I ask for a copy of my family member's records, how quickly will I get them and what does it cost?"
☐ "Where do you post the contact information for the state agency and the ombudsman, in case we ever need to file a complaint?"
☐ "Where do you post your latest state inspection results and the ombudsman's contact information?"
☐ "How do you protect residents' privacy, both in their medical records and in day-to-day care?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 335447 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)