How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
250 Shearer Street, Palmer, MA 01069 (opens Google Maps) · Hampden County · (413) 289-9887· 61 certified beds · avg 53 residents/day · certified since Feb 15, 2002 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 14 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not allow a resident's chosen representative — often a family member or someone with power of attorney — to exercise the resident's rights on their behalf. When a resident can't speak for themselves, their representative steps into that role. F-0551
The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. F-0641
The facility did not treat residents with respect and dignity, or did not let them keep and use their own personal belongings. · from a complaint F-0557
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not allow a resident's chosen representative — often a family member or someone with power of attorney — to exercise the resident's rights on their behalf. When a resident can't speak for themselves, their representative steps into that role. · F-0551 |
| Jan 6, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Dec 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with respect and dignity, or did not let them keep and use their own personal belongings. · from a complaint · F-0557 |
| Dec 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint · F-0607 |
| Sep 2, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint · F-0607 |
| Sep 26, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Sep 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with respect and dignity, or did not let them keep and use their own personal belongings. · F-0557 |
| Sep 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Sep 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Sep 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Sep 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not prepare and serve food in a form that meets each resident's individual needs — for example, chopped, pureed, or softened food for residents with chewing or swallowing problems. · F-0805 |
| Sep 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not regularly inspect bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails for safety, or the rails and mattresses were not attached safely to the frames. · F-0909 |
| Aug 10, 2023 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not employ enough qualified food and nutrition staff, including a qualified dietician, to properly run its food service. · F-0801 |
| Aug 10, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly plan a resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs after leaving. · F-0660 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 2).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 7 | 0 | F |
| 2025 | 3 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 2 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Massachusetts avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.86 | 3.89 | 3.95 | top 41% in Massachusetts; top 46% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.72 | 0.65 | 0.69 | top 28% in Massachusetts; top 35% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.40 | 3.51 | 3.50 | top 48% in Massachusetts; top 47% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.42 | 0.46 | 0.48 | top 44% in Massachusetts; top 44% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 55.1 | 38.2 | 45.8 | bottom 8% in Massachusetts; bottom 25% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 66.7 | 42.6 | 42.9 | bottom 12% in Massachusetts; bottom 15% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.18, RN 0.59, weekend 2.80.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.18 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: —/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Palmer Healthcare Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cavalier, David | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/03/2016 |
| Wellman Realty, LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/30/2016 |
| Ascentria Consulting Services INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/01/2025 |
| Cavalier, David | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/03/2016 |
| Cavalier, David | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/03/2016 |
| Cavalier, David | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/03/2016 |
| Cavalier, David | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2004 |
| Cliftonlarsonallen LLP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| Mintz, Joshua | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2025 |
| Mintz, Joshua | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2025 |
| Twomagnets LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/17/2023 |
| Wellman Realty, LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/30/2016 |
All 12 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hampden Post Acute | 4.8 mi | Wilbraham, MA | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Life Care Center of Wilbraham | 6.1 mi | Wilbraham, MA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Vantage at Hampden LLC | 9.4 mi | Hampden, MA | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Sixteen Acres Health and Rehabilitation Center LLC | 10.3 mi | Springfield, MA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Chicopee Rehabilitation and Nursing | 10.8 mi | Chicopee, MA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Loomis Lakeside at Reeds Landing | 10.9 mi | Springfield, MA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Quaboag Rehabilitation & Skilled Care Facility | 11.1 mi | West Brookfield, MA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Chestnut Hill Health and Rehabilitation Center LLC | 11.7 mi | East Longmeadow, MA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| East Longmeadow Skilled Nursing Center | 12.7 mi | East Longmeadow, MA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Care One at Redstone | 13.0 mi | East Longmeadow, MA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| South Hadley Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 13.3 mi | South Hadley, MA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Julian J Levitt Family Nursing Home | 13.3 mi | Longmeadow, MA | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Hampden, MA — 26 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 225763.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details