MassachusettsLongmeadow

Julian J Levitt Family Nursing Home

770 Converse Street, Longmeadow, MA 01106 · Hampden County · 200 certified beds · avg 183 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1967

Part of chain: CHELSEA JEWISH LIFECARE (5 facilities, chain avg rating 4.8★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$11,468
Fines, last 3 years
3.70
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · May 21, 2024 · F-0656 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.

Why it matters: Without a complete, working care plan, important needs can slip through the cracks and no one is accountable for results.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jun 10, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · May 21, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jun 10, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (21)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 7, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
May 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
May 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
May 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
May 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids.
May 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or obtain laboratory tests when a doctor ordered them, or did not promptly report the results back to the doctor who ordered them.
May 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Jan 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
May 21, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
May 21, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Apr 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · from a complaint
Feb 21, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Feb 21, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Feb 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Feb 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Feb 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids.
Feb 21, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Feb 21, 2024B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Aug 16, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Aug 16, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (8 → 7).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202220D
2024112G ▲
202580E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $11,468.

DateTypeAmount / length
May 21, 2024Fine$11,468

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMassachusetts avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.703.893.95bottom 46% in Massachusetts; bottom 47% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.450.650.69bottom 21% in Massachusetts; bottom 29% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.393.513.50top 49% in Massachusetts; top 48% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.400.460.48bottom 49% in Massachusetts; top 48% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)38.738.245.8bottom 46% in Massachusetts; top 33% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)35.342.642.9top 37% in Massachusetts; top 39% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.94, RN 0.47, weekend 3.61. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Chelsea Jewish Lifecare INCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest100%03/09/2019
JGS Lifecare CorporationOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%06/15/1994
Albert, JaneIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2023
Albert, JaneIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2023
Albert, JaneIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2023
Anfang, StuartIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/1999
Anfang, StuartIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2021
Anfang, StuartIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/1999
Berman, AdamIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2018
Berman, AdamIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2018
Berman, AdamIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2018
Berman, AdamIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2018
Berman, BarryIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/18/2018
Berman, BarryIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2018
Brudnick, JeffreyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/14/2018
Carmel, LaurenIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/22/2019
Carmel, LaurenIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/22/2019
Carr, ChristopherIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2018
Carr, ChristopherIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2018
Casartello, CarolIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE05/01/2020

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
East Longmeadow Skilled Nursing Center1.0 miEast Longmeadow, MA★★★★☆4/5
Care One at Redstone1.4 miEast Longmeadow, MA★★☆☆☆2/5
Chestnut Hill Health and Rehabilitation Center LLC2.6 miEast Longmeadow, MA★★★☆☆3/5
Sixteen Acres Health and Rehabilitation Center LLC3.1 miSpringfield, MA★★★★☆4/5
Agawam East Rehab and Nursing3.4 miAgawam, MA★★★★★4/5
Agawam North Rehab and Nursing3.6 miAgawam, MA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Loomis Lakeside at Reeds Landing3.6 miSpringfield, MA★★★★★5/5
Agawam West Rehab and Nursing3.7 miAgawam, MA★★☆☆☆2/5
Agawam South Rehab and Nursing3.7 miAgawam, MA★★★★☆3/5
Parkway Pavilion Health and Rehabilitation Center5.7 miEnfield, CT★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Longmeadow →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 225040.