How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Nashua Post Acute Care
55 Harris Road, Nashua, NH 03062 (opens Google Maps) · Hillsborough County · (603) 888-1573· 290 certified beds · avg 228 residents/day · certified since Nov 1, 1968 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES (87 facilities, chain avg rating 3.0★)
1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Nov 21, 2025
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.57
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 29 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint F-0584
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
View all 29 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584 |
| Nov 21, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Nov 21, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Nov 21, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time. · F-0561 |
| Nov 21, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from being involuntarily separated — kept apart from other residents, kept out of their own room, or confined to their room. Isolating a resident this way is a form of mistreatment. · F-0603 |
| Nov 21, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Nov 21, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Nov 21, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not serve meals and snacks at times that fit residents' needs, preferences, and requests, or did not offer nourishing alternatives for residents who want to eat outside scheduled meal times. · F-0809 |
| Oct 10, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Oct 10, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Oct 10, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Oct 10, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Oct 10, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide routine dental care and 24-hour emergency dental care for residents. · F-0790 |
| Oct 10, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · F-0806 |
| Oct 10, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. · F-0883 |
| Oct 10, 2024 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · F-0625 |
| Oct 10, 2024 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way. · F-0637 |
| Jul 25, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper foot care for residents. Foot care includes routine care like nail trimming and attention to foot problems, which matter greatly for older adults. · from a complaint · F-0687 |
| Oct 6, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Oct 6, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · F-0725 |
| Oct 6, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Oct 6, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · F-0804 |
| Oct 6, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · F-0806 |
| Oct 6, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | When a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care. · F-0661 |
| Oct 6, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a policy covering how food brought in by family and visitors is used and stored safely. · F-0813 |
| Oct 6, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Oct 6, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. · F-0883 |
| Oct 6, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not educate residents and staff about COVID-19 vaccination, offer the vaccine to those eligible after that education, or properly document everyone's vaccination status. · F-0887 |
| Oct 6, 2023 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (9 → 8).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2023
All citations: 11
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 10
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 8
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 11 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 10 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 8 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityNew Hampshire averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 2.57
New Hampshire average: 4.11
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.61
New Hampshire average: 0.82
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.24
New Hampshire average: 3.67
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New Hampshire avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.57 | 4.11 | 3.95 | bottom 1% in New Hampshire; bottom 4% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.61 | 0.82 | 0.69 | bottom 25% in New Hampshire; top 48% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.24 | 3.67 | 3.50 | bottom 1% in New Hampshire; bottom 4% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.56 | 0.55 | 0.48 | top 40% in New Hampshire; top 27% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 48.3 | 44.1 | 45.8 | bottom 28% in New Hampshire; bottom 41% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 44.7 | 40.9 | 42.9 | bottom 36% in New Hampshire; bottom 44% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.02, RN 0.71, weekend 2.63.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.02 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Nashua Post Acute Care. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NFR 2020 Irrv Tr | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/05/2025 |
| Premier Holdings LLC | Organization | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/05/2025 |
| Quinto Nexgen LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/05/2025 |
| Rsbrmk Holdings LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/05/2025 |
| SK Nexgen Tr | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/05/2025 |
| Skilled Venture LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/05/2025 |
| Tryko Nexgen Holdings LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/05/2025 |
| Uak 2020 Irrv Tr | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/05/2025 |
| Ukr Nexgen LLC | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/05/2025 |
| Yk Nexgen Tr | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/05/2025 |
| Yr Nexgen Tr | Organization | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/05/2025 |
| Cibc Bank USA | Organization | 5% or Greater Security Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/05/2025 |
| Flagler, Osher | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/15/2025 |
| Greenhalgh, Katrina | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/05/2025 |
| Greenhalgh, Katrina | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/05/2025 |
| Greenhalgh, Katrina | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/05/2025 |
| Greenhalgh, Katrina | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/05/2025 |
| Kahanow, Aviva | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/15/2025 |
| Levovitz, Tzvi | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/15/2025 |
| Marquis Limited LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/05/2025 |
Showing 20 of 46 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 26 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Marquis Health Services — 87 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Allendale Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Allendale, NJ · overall 4/5
- Arbor Ridge Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Wayne, NJ · overall 2/5
- Avalon Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Hamilton, NJ · overall 1/5
- Berlin Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Berlin, NJ · overall 4/5
- Cambridge Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Moorestown, NJ · overall 3/5
- Coral Harbor Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Neptune City, NJ · overall 4/5
- Crest Pointe Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Pt Pleasant, NJ · overall 1/5
- Florham Park Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Florham Park, NJ · overall 5/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 86 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "What choices do residents have over their daily schedule, like meal times, bathing, and activities?"
- "Under what circumstances, if any, would a resident ever be kept in their room or separated from others?"
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "What happens if a resident is hungry between meals or misses a mealtime — what food options are available?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the New Hampshire midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 48% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 46 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 53 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Courville at Nashua | 1.0 mi | Nashua, NH | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Fairview Nursing Home | 2.5 mi | Hudson, NH | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| D'youville Care for Advanced Therapy | 8.1 mi | Lowell, MA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Northwood Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center | 8.2 mi | Lowell, MA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| D'youville Senior Care | 8.3 mi | Lowell, MA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Fairhaven Healthcare Center | 8.8 mi | Lowell, MA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Palm Springs Post Acute | 9.8 mi | Chelmsford, MA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Seven Hills Pediatric Center | 9.8 mi | Groton, MA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Regalcare at Lowell | 9.9 mi | Lowell, MA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Care One at Lowell | 10.5 mi | Lowell, MA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| The Elms Center | 11.7 mi | Milford, NH | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Ayer Valley Rehab and Nursing | 11.8 mi | Ayer, MA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Hillsborough, NH — 21 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Pheasant Wood Center — Peterborough, NH · overall 2/5
- Ridgewood Center, Genesis Healthcare — Bedford, NH · overall 2/5
- Saint Teresa Rehabilitation & Nursing Center — Manchester, NH · overall 2/5
- St Joseph Residence — Manchester, NH · overall 4/5
- Villa Crest Nursing and Retirement Center — Manchester, NH · overall 4/5
- Bedford Hills Center — Bedford, NH · overall 4/5
- Bedford Nursing & Rehabilitation Center — Bedford, NH · overall 1/5SFF
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 305005.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).