New Jersey ›Wayne

Arbor Ridge Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center

Costs & paymentPlan a visit

261 Terhune Drive, Wayne, NJ 07470 (opens Google Maps) · Passaic County · (973) 835-3871· 120 certified beds · avg 112 residents/day · certified since Sep 1, 1986 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES (87 facilities, chain avg rating 3.0★)

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Oct 17, 2024
1
Serious findings on record
most recent Jun 5, 2026
$27,378
Fines, last 3 years
3.29
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Jun 5, 2026 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: Jul 7, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 19 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

  1. J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated

    The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint F-0684

  2. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint F-0656

  3. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. F-0582

View all 19 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 5, 2026▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684
Jun 5, 2026D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656
Oct 17, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582
Oct 17, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · F-0600
Oct 17, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609
Oct 17, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. · F-0636
Oct 17, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way. · F-0637
Oct 17, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641
Oct 17, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758
Oct 17, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · F-0760
Oct 17, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761
Oct 17, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812
Oct 17, 2024D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842
Nov 23, 2022E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755
Nov 23, 2022D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756
Nov 23, 2022D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not provide bedrooms with required basics: a window to the outside, a room at or above ground level, adequate bedding, furniture that fits the resident's needs, or enough closet space. · F-0917
Sep 24, 2020E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688
Sep 24, 2020D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658
Sep 24, 2020D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 11).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2020
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2022
All citations: 3
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 11
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 1

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202030E
202230E
2024110D
202621J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

1 fine totaling $27,378.

Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.

DateTypeAmount / length
Jun 5, 2026Fine$27,378

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
This facilityNew Jersey averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.29
New Jersey average: 3.88
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.84
New Jersey average: 0.67
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.94
New Jersey average: 3.53
U.S. average: 3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

MeasureThis facilityNew Jersey avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.293.883.95bottom 23% in New Jersey; bottom 26% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.840.670.69top 22% in New Jersey; top 24% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.943.533.50bottom 19% in New Jersey; bottom 27% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.680.500.48top 17% in New Jersey; top 17% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)24.539.745.8top 13% in New Jersey; top 6% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)16.737.742.9top 10% in New Jersey; top 9% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.34, RN 0.86, weekend 2.99.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.34 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Arbor Ridge Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

  • Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
  • Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
  • Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Quinto Delta LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest89%12/05/2019
Tryko Delta Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest67%12/05/2019
Arbor Ridge Property LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/05/2019
Kohn Fam Tr GST Exempt Uad 3-25-13OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Krisa, PaulIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/05/2019
Krisa, PaulIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/05/2019
Labkovsky, AaronIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE10/06/2021
Labkovsky, AaronIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE10/06/2021
Labkovsky, AaronIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/06/2021
Labkovsky, AaronIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/06/2021
M&t BankOrganization5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/04/2019
Marquis Limited LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2021
Marquis Limited LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/12/2025
NFR 2020 Irrv TrOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Nutraco LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/15/2020
Nutraco LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/12/2025
Posen, MindeeIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Posen, MindeeIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Quinto Delta LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE12/05/2019
Reliant Pro Rehab LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/29/2021

Showing 20 of 29 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 9 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.

Other facilities in the same chain

CMS lists this facility under the chain Marquis Health Services — 87 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.

Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 86 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

  • "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
  • "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
  • "Before any service that isn't covered by Medicare or Medicaid, how will you notify us and get our agreement?"
  • "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
  • "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
  • "How soon after admission is a full assessment completed, and how are the findings shared with the family?"
  • "If my family member's health suddenly changes, how quickly do you reassess them and update their care?"
  • "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"

Also worth asking anywhere

  • "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the New Jersey midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
  • "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
  • "CMS reports 25% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
  • "The ownership record on file lists 29 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
  • "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 111 within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Complete Care at Wayne Hills Rehab & Resp Center0.3 miWayne, NJ★☆☆☆☆1/5
Llanfair House Care & Rehabilitation Center1.3 miWayne, NJ★★☆☆☆2/5
Oakland Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center1.5 miOakland, NJ★★★☆☆2/5
Phoenix Center for Rehabilitation and Pediatrics1.9 miHaskell, NJ★★★☆☆3/5
Health Center at Bloomingdale2.4 miBloomingdale, NJ★★★★★4/5
Lakeland Nursing & Rehab2.5 miHaskell, NJ★★★★☆3/5
Careone at Wayne2.8 miWayne, NJ★★★★★5/5
Cedar Crest/Mountainview Gardens3.0 miPompton Plains, NJ★★★★☆2/5abuse
Avalon Rehab and Care Center3.3 miWayne, NJ★★★☆☆4/5
Atrium Post Acute Care of Wayne3.9 miWayne, NJ★★★★☆4/5
Excel Care at Wayne4.8 miWayne, NJ★☆☆☆☆2/5
Windmere5.0 miNorth Haledon, NJ★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

Other facilities in the same county

CMS records place this facility in Passaic, NJ — 19 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.

Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.

All facilities in Wayne →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315234.

Your research

Viewed & saved homes

Kept in this browser tab for this session. Choose to remember them only on a device you trust. Opening a record or comparison sends its usual page request.

Selected for comparison

Recently viewed

Prices entered in a cost worksheet stay on that page and are not saved. Privacy details