New HampshireMilford

The Elms Center

71 Elm Street, Milford, NH 03055 · Hillsborough County · 52 certified beds · avg 44 residents/day · certified since Aug 1, 1996

Part of chain: 603 HEALTHCARE (7 facilities, chain avg rating 3.6★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$9,770
Fines, last 3 years
2.95
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jan 25, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Feb 22, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (19)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
May 27, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have doctor's orders in place for a resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted. · from a complaint
Feb 24, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Jan 10, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand.
Jan 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Jan 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Jan 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jan 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jan 10, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's quality committee — the internal group responsible for finding and fixing care problems — did not have the required members or did not meet at least every three months.
Jan 10, 2025C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Jan 10, 2025C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies.
Jan 10, 2025B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way.
Jan 25, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Jan 25, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
Jan 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Jan 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jan 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly run its feeding assistant program — assessing which residents are appropriate for it, following each resident's care plan, and making sure feeding assistants are trained and supervised. Feeding assistants are trained helpers who assist residents at mealtimes.
Jan 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 25, 2024C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not let a resident help develop and carry out their own plan of care — the written roadmap of the services and support they'll receive, built around their personal goals and preferences.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (10 → 1).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202471G ▲
2025100F
202620D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $9,770.

DateTypeAmount / length
Jan 25, 2024Fine$9,770

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNew Hampshire avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)2.954.113.95bottom 7% in New Hampshire; bottom 12% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.720.820.69bottom 44% in New Hampshire; top 34% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.613.673.50bottom 7% in New Hampshire; bottom 13% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.410.550.48bottom 26% in New Hampshire; top 47% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)64.044.145.8bottom 7% in New Hampshire; bottom 11% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)77.840.942.9bottom 4% in New Hampshire; bottom 7% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.02, RN 0.74, weekend 2.67. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
PR NH Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest48%02/19/2024
Rausman, PhilipIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2024
Rausman, RobertIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2024
RR NH Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest48%02/19/2024
Stevenson, SeanIndividualDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/19/2024
603 Healthcare LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2024
603 Healthcare LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/29/2025
Manchin, CrystalIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2024
Manchin, CrystalIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2024
Ojutalayo, AyobamiIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2024
Ojutalayo, AyobamiIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2025
Stevenson, SeanIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Crestwood Center0.3 miMilford, NH★★★★☆3/5
Courville at Nashua11.3 miNashua, NH★★★★★4/5
Nashua Post Acute Care11.7 miNashua, NH★☆☆☆☆1/5
Bedford Nursing & Rehabilitation Center12.2 miBedford, NH★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
Ridgewood Center, Genesis Healthcare12.4 miBedford, NH★★☆☆☆2/5
Bedford Hills Center12.5 miBedford, NH★★★★☆4/5
Hillsborough County Nursing Home13.4 miGoffstown, NH★★★★★3/5
Fairview Nursing Home13.8 miHudson, NH★☆☆☆☆1/5
Goffstown Nursing and Rehab Center14.0 miGoffstown, NH★☆☆☆☆1/5
Pheasant Wood Center14.9 miPeterborough, NH★★☆☆☆2/5
Maple Leaf Health Care Center15.1 miManchester, NH★★★★★5/5
Courville at Manchester15.3 miManchester, NH★★☆☆☆1/5SFF

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Milford →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 305068.