New JerseyNew Providence

Spring Grove Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center

144 Gales Drive, New Providence, NJ 07974 · Union County · 106 certified beds · avg 97 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1967

Part of chain: MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES (87 facilities, chain avg rating 3.0★)

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$10,527
Fines, last 3 years
3.30
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Oct 29, 2024 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Dec 3, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (32)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 30, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Mar 30, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Mar 30, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function.
Mar 30, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Mar 30, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Mar 30, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Mar 30, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Mar 30, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Mar 30, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Mar 30, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day.
Mar 30, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety.
Mar 30, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Mar 30, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
Mar 30, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Dec 4, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Oct 29, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Oct 29, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Oct 29, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Oct 29, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Oct 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Oct 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Oct 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.
May 10, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Aug 15, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Aug 15, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint
Aug 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Aug 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Aug 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Aug 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives.
Aug 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Aug 15, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Aug 15, 2023C · Minimal risk, facility-wideThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 14).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202390E
202481G ▲
202510D
2026140E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $10,527.

DateTypeAmount / length
Oct 29, 2024Fine$10,527

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNew Jersey avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.303.883.95bottom 24% in New Jersey; bottom 27% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.640.670.69top 40% in New Jersey; top 43% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.103.533.50bottom 32% in New Jersey; bottom 36% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.460.500.48top 41% in New Jersey; top 38% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)29.539.745.8top 23% in New Jersey; top 13% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)25.037.742.9top 25% in New Jersey; top 20% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.56, RN 0.70, weekend 3.34. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Yr 2013 Investment Tr Ua 03252013Organization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest22%10/04/2018
Cibc Bank USAOrganization5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE09/06/2018
Kohn Fam Tr GST Exempt Uad 3-25-13OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Marquis Limited LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2021
Marquis Limited LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/26/2025
NFR 2020 Irrv TrOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Nutraco LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/04/2018
Nutraco LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/27/2025
Patel, SamirIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/04/2018
Patel, SamirIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/04/2018
Posen, MindeeIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Posen, MindeeIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/04/2018
Quinto Guardian LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/04/2018
Reliant Pro Rehab LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/04/2018
Reliant Pro Rehab LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/27/2025
Rsbrmk Holdings LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Schaffer, YerachmielIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE11/18/2024
Schaffer, YerachmielIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/18/2024
Schottlander, MatthewIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE04/22/2024
Schottlander, MatthewIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/22/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Continuing Care at Lantern Hill1.2 miNew Providence, NJ★★★☆☆2/5
Autumn Lake Healthcare at Berkeley Heights2.4 miBerkeley Heights, NJ★★★★☆3/5
Runnells Center for Rehabilitation & Healthcare2.6 miBerkeley Heights, NJ★★☆☆☆2/5
Chatham Hills Subacute Care Center2.7 miChatham, NJ★★★★☆3/5
Childrens Specialized Hospital Mountainside3.5 miMountainside, NJ★★★★★5/5
Mountainside Skilled Nursing and Rehab3.5 miMountainside, NJ★★★☆☆2/5
McAuley Hall Health Care Cente4.0 miWatchung, NJ★★★★☆4/5
Pine Acres Rehabilitation and Healthcare4.3 miMadison, NJ★★★★★4/5
Cheshire Home4.9 miFlorham Park, NJ★★★★★4/5
Careone at Livingston5.2 miLivingston, NJ★★★★☆4/5
Aristacare at Norwood Terrace5.4 miPlainfield, NJ★★★★★4/5
Florham Park Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center5.6 miFlorham Park, NJ★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in New Providence →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315005.