6021 W. Cheyenne Ave., Las Vegas, NV 89108 (opens Google Maps) · Clark County · (702) 658-9494· 188 certified beds · avg 149 residents/day · certified since Jun 18, 1999 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: MARQUIS COMPANIES (15 facilities, chain avg rating 4.3★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Apr 15, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: May 15, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 18 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint F-0689
The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · from a complaint F-0644
The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. F-0655
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2026 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Sep 12, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · from a complaint · F-0644 |
| Sep 12, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655 |
| Sep 12, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Sep 12, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them. · F-0694 |
| Sep 12, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Sep 12, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a policy covering how food brought in by family and visitors is used and stored safely. · F-0813 |
| May 7, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint · F-0580 |
| Sep 20, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Sep 20, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | When a resident had a planned discharge, the facility did not make sure the necessary information was communicated to the resident and to the doctors or facility taking over their care. · F-0661 |
| Sep 20, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Sep 20, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
| Sep 20, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Sep 20, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations. · F-0883 |
| Sep 14, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582 |
| Sep 14, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Sep 14, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Sep 14, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (6 → 6).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 4 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 6 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 7 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 1 | 1 | G ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $13,065.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2026 | Fine | $13,065 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Nevada avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.20 | 4.05 | 3.95 | bottom 11% in Nevada; bottom 22% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.82 | 0.98 | 0.69 | bottom 41% in Nevada; top 26% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.82 | 3.61 | 3.50 | bottom 14% in Nevada; bottom 22% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.79 | 0.87 | 0.48 | top 37% in Nevada; top 12% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 39.5 | 45.1 | 45.8 | top 33% in Nevada; top 35% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 27.6 | 43.4 | 42.9 | top 23% in Nevada; top 25% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.12, RN 1.05, weekend 3.64.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.12 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Marquis Plaza Regency Post Acute Rehab. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fogg, Phillip | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 100% | 06/22/2012 |
| Marquis Companies I, INC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 09/01/2019 |
| Fogg, Phillip | Individual | Contracted Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/22/2012 |
| Fogg, Phillip | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/22/2012 |
| Fogg, Phillip | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/22/2012 |
| Fogg, Phillip | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2019 |
| Fogg, Steven | Individual | Contracted Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2019 |
| Fogg, Steven | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/22/2012 |
| Fogg, Steven | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2018 |
| Meyer, Lisa | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/16/2019 |
| Meyer, Lisa | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/16/2019 |
| Sprando, Erin | Individual | Contracted Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2018 |
| Sprando, Erin | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2019 |
| Tone, Staci | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/22/2012 |
| Tone, Staci | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2019 |
All 15 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Marquis Companies — 15 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 14 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| El Jen Skilled Care | 1.0 mi | Las Vegas, NV | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Advanced Health Care of Summerlin | 1.2 mi | Las Vegas, NV | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Neurorestorative | 1.7 mi | Las Vegas, NV | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Silver Hills Health Care Center | 1.7 mi | Las Vegas, NV | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Life Care Center of Las Vegas | 2.0 mi | Las Vegas, NV | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Royal Springs Healthcare and Rehab | 2.8 mi | Las Vegas, NV | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Neurorestorative | 3.1 mi | Las Vegas, NV | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Silver Ridge Healthcare Center | 4.1 mi | Las Vegas, NV | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Torrey Pines Post Acute and Rehabilitation | 4.5 mi | Las Vegas, NV | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Horizon Health and Rehabilitation Center | 4.8 mi | Las Vegas, NV | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Silver State Pediatric Skilled Nursing Facility | 4.9 mi | Las Vegas, NV | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Saint Joseph Transitional Rehabilitation Center | 5.2 mi | Las Vegas, NV | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Clark, NV — 42 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 295070.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details