NevadaLas Vegas

Silver Ridge Healthcare Center

1151 Torrey Pines Dr., Las Vegas, NV 89146 · Clark County · 148 certified beds · avg 144 residents/day · certified since Sep 30, 1999

Part of chain: COVENANT CARE (12 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$69,343
Fines, last 3 years
3.51
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Apr 11, 2025 · F-0812

The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.

Why it matters: Unsafe food handling is one of the most common causes of food poisoning, which can be dangerous for frail residents.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: May 22, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Nov 7, 2023 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Dec 7, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (32)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 24, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Apr 24, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Apr 24, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors. · from a complaint
Apr 11, 2025▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Apr 11, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
Apr 11, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Apr 11, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Apr 11, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Apr 11, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Apr 11, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure its nurse aides had the skills needed to care for residents, including training in dementia care and abuse prevention.
Jan 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · from a complaint
Jan 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Jan 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Jan 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Jun 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Apr 26, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Apr 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Apr 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Apr 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Apr 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Apr 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Apr 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Apr 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Apr 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Apr 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Apr 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
Nov 7, 2023▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Nov 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · from a complaint
Nov 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Nov 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint
Nov 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the social services residents need — such as counseling, help with adjustment, or connecting to outside resources — to achieve the best possible quality of life. · from a complaint
Nov 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 3).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202361G ▲
2024120E
2025111K ▲
202630D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $69,343.

DateTypeAmount / length
Apr 11, 2025Fine$61,900
Nov 7, 2023Fine$7,443

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNevada avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.514.053.95bottom 32% in Nevada; bottom 37% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.650.980.69bottom 29% in Nevada; top 42% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.113.613.50bottom 29% in Nevada; bottom 37% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.570.870.48bottom 40% in Nevada; top 26% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)55.645.145.8bottom 21% in Nevada; bottom 24% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)66.743.442.9bottom 12% in Nevada; bottom 15% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.47, RN 0.64, weekend 3.07. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Centre Capital Investors V, LPOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest07/17/2008
Centre Covenant Purchaser (b), LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest07/17/2008
Centre Covenant Purchaser (q), LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest07/17/2008
Centre Covenant Purchaser (s), LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest12/19/2008
Centre V Secondary Fund, L.P.Organization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest07/17/2008
Covenant Care California, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%07/17/2008
Covenant Care, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest07/17/2008
Covenant Holdco, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest07/17/2008
Covenant Subco, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest07/17/2008
Evans, MaryIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest07/17/2008
Levin, RobertIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest07/17/2008
Sims, ChristineIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest07/17/2008
State Treasurer of Mich Custodian of Public School Empl RTMNT SystemsOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest12/19/2008
Stockwell Fund II LPOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest12/19/2008
Torok, AndrewIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest07/17/2008
Ashley, DavaIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE05/17/2018
Carney, KevinIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2013
Evans, MaryIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2013
Hassell, LanceIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE05/17/2018
Hassell, LanceIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/17/2018

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Torrey Pines Post Acute and Rehabilitation0.4 miLas Vegas, NV★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Life Care Center of Las Vegas2.1 miLas Vegas, NV★★★☆☆3/5
Silver State Pediatric Skilled Nursing Facility2.8 miLas Vegas, NV★★★★★4/5
Neurorestorative2.9 miLas Vegas, NV★★★★★5/5
Saint Joseph Transitional Rehabilitation Center3.4 miLas Vegas, NV★★★★☆3/5
Advanced Health Care of Summerlin3.9 miLas Vegas, NV★★★★☆3/5
Marquis Plaza Regency Post Acute Rehab4.1 miLas Vegas, NV★★★★☆4/5
Horizon Health and Rehabilitation Center4.1 miLas Vegas, NV★★☆☆☆2/5
Royal Springs Healthcare and Rehab4.6 miLas Vegas, NV★☆☆☆☆2/5
Neurorestorative4.7 miLas Vegas, NV★★★★★5/5
Silver Hills Health Care Center4.8 miLas Vegas, NV★★☆☆☆2/5
El Jen Skilled Care5.0 miLas Vegas, NV★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Las Vegas →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 295072.