Royal Springs Healthcare and Rehab

Name: Royal Springs Healthcare and Rehab
Address: 8501 DEL WEBB BLVD, Las Vegas, NV, 89134, US
Telephone: 7028043000

8501 Del Webb Blvd, Las Vegas, NV 89134 · Clark County · 225 certified beds · avg 214 residents/day · certified since Nov 9, 1999

Part of chain: IL & JOAN LEE (4 facilities, chain avg rating 2.0★)

2/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

$40,359

Fines, last 3 years

3.83

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Oct 29, 2024 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Dec 12, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (39)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Mar 13, 2026	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide its staff with required training on behavioral health — caring for residents with conditions like dementia, depression, or other mental health needs.
Mar 13, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Mar 13, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint
Mar 13, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Mar 13, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Mar 13, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Mar 13, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Mar 13, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Mar 13, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Mar 13, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 13, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life. · from a complaint
Feb 14, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
Feb 14, 2025	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Feb 14, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need.
Feb 14, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Feb 14, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Feb 14, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Feb 14, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Feb 14, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Feb 14, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Feb 14, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies.
Feb 14, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not run an ongoing quality assurance committee that reviews care problems and creates plans to fix them.
Feb 14, 2025	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Oct 29, 2024	▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Oct 29, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Mar 15, 2024	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 15, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices.
Mar 15, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Mar 15, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered.
Mar 15, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Mar 15, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Mar 15, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Mar 15, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Mar 15, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Mar 15, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes.
Mar 15, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Mar 15, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Mar 15, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Mar 15, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (12 → 11).

Year	Citations	Serious (G–L)	Worst severity that year
2024	16	1	J ▲
2025	12	0	E
2026	11	0	E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $40,359.

Date	Type	Amount / length
Oct 29, 2024	Fine	$40,359

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	Nevada avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	3.83	4.05	3.95	top 48% in Nevada; top 47% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.90	0.98	0.69	top 43% in Nevada; top 21% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	3.37	3.61	3.50	top 46% in Nevada; top 49% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.75	0.87	0.48	top 41% in Nevada; top 13% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	40.5	45.1	45.8	top 34% in Nevada; top 38% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	46.0	43.4	42.9	bottom 43% in Nevada; bottom 42% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.69, RN 0.87, weekend 3.25. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 1/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Barrera, Odessa	Individual	Direct Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	08/16/2021
Lee, Il	Individual	Direct Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	12/10/2002
Lee, Joan	Individual	Direct Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	12/10/2002
Lopez, Mark	Individual	Direct Ownership Interest	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2024
Barrera, Odessa	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	08/16/2021
Barrera, Odessa	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	08/16/2021
Lee Hospital Consulting INC	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2012
Lee Hospital Consulting INC	Organization	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	01/29/2025
Lee, Il	Individual	Managing Control - Governing Body	NOT APPLICABLE	12/10/2002
Lee, Il	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	12/03/2002
Lee, Il	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	12/10/2002
Lee, Il	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/10/2002
Lee, Joan	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	12/10/2002
Lee, Joan	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	12/10/2002
Lee, Joan	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	12/10/2002
Lopez, Mark	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2024
Lopez, Mark	Individual	ADP of the SNF	NOT APPLICABLE	06/01/2024

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
"What training do your staff receive for caring for residents with dementia or mental health conditions?"
"Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
"Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
"Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
"How do you care for residents with incontinence or catheters, and what do you do to prevent urinary tract infections?"
"How do you decide when a feeding tube is truly needed, and how do staff care for residents who have one?"
"How often is each resident's medication list reviewed, and who decides when a drug can be reduced or stopped?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Neurorestorative	1.4 mi	Las Vegas, NV	★★★★★	5/5
Silver Hills Health Care Center	1.4 mi	Las Vegas, NV	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Advanced Health Care of Summerlin	1.7 mi	Las Vegas, NV	★★★★☆	3/5
Neurorestorative	1.8 mi	Las Vegas, NV	★★★★★	5/5
Marquis Plaza Regency Post Acute Rehab	2.8 mi	Las Vegas, NV	★★★★☆	4/5
Life Care Center of Las Vegas	3.2 mi	Las Vegas, NV	★★★☆☆	3/5
El Jen Skilled Care	3.6 mi	Las Vegas, NV	★☆☆☆☆	1/5	abuse
The Heights of Summerlin, LLC	4.1 mi	Las Vegas, NV	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Las Ventanas Retirement Comm SNF	4.2 mi	Las Vegas, NV	★★★★★	4/5
Silver Ridge Healthcare Center	4.6 mi	Las Vegas, NV	★★★★☆	3/5
Marquis Care at Centennial Hills	4.7 mi	Las Vegas, NV	★★★★☆	3/5
Torrey Pines Post Acute and Rehabilitation	4.9 mi	Las Vegas, NV	★★☆☆☆	2/5	abuse

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Las Vegas →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 295073.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Royal Springs Healthcare and Rehab

8501 Del Webb Blvd, Las Vegas, NV 89134 · 7028043000

Health inspection rating 2/5 · CMS overall 1/5· Fines (3y): $40,359

Most serious findings on record:

▲ Oct 29, 2024 (F-0684, Immediate jeopardy, one-off): The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
☐ "What training do your staff receive for caring for residents with dementia or mental health conditions?"
☐ "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
☐ "Who is on the team that builds each resident's care plan, and how quickly is it in place after admission?"
☐ "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
☐ "How do you care for residents with incontinence or catheters, and what do you do to prevent urinary tract infections?"
☐ "How do you decide when a feeding tube is truly needed, and how do staff care for residents who have one?"
☐ "How often is each resident's medication list reviewed, and who decides when a drug can be reduced or stopped?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 295073 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)