Marquis Piedmont Post Acute Rehab

Name: Marquis Piedmont Post Acute Rehab
Address: 319 NE RUSSET, Portland, OR, 97211, US
Telephone: 5032895571

319 NE Russet, Portland, OR 97211 · Multnomah County · 70 certified beds · avg 47 residents/day · certified since Sep 14, 1989

Part of chain: MARQUIS COMPANIES (15 facilities, chain avg rating 4.3★)

4/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

Fines, last 3 years

6.22

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (18)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Apr 10, 2026	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Apr 10, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Apr 10, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Apr 10, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay).
Apr 10, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Apr 10, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Apr 10, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide appropriate treatment and services to residents with a mental health condition, difficulty adjusting emotionally, or a history of trauma or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
Apr 10, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care.
Dec 6, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Dec 6, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Sep 30, 2024	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint
Sep 30, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · from a complaint
Sep 30, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Sep 30, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Mar 2, 2020	F · Potential for harm, facility-wide	The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 2, 2020	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Mar 2, 2020	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Mar 2, 2020	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 8).

Year	Citations	Worst severity that year
2020	4	F
2024	6	F
2026	8	E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	Oregon avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	6.22	5.42	3.95	top 8% in Oregon; top 3% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.94	0.78	0.69	top 21% in Oregon; top 18% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	5.56	4.85	3.50	top 12% in Oregon; top 3% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.44	0.48	0.48	top 38% in Oregon; top 41% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	60.4	47.4	45.8	bottom 20% in Oregon; bottom 16% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	62.5	51.6	42.9	bottom 33% in Oregon; bottom 19% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 6.20, RN 0.94, weekend 5.54. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Fogg, Phillip	Individual	5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest	100%	06/22/2012
Marquis Companies I, INC	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	100%	04/01/2013
English, Meagan	Individual	Contracted Managing Employee	NOT APPLICABLE	04/01/2013
English, Meagan	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	04/01/2013
Fogg, Phillip	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	06/22/2012
Fogg, Steven	Individual	Contracted Managing Employee	NOT APPLICABLE	04/01/2013
Fogg, Steven	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	06/22/2012
Fogg, Steven	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	04/01/2013
Levee, Kathleen	Individual	Contracted Managing Employee	NOT APPLICABLE	04/01/2013
Levee, Kathleen	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	04/01/2013
Marquis Companies I, INC	Organization	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	04/01/2013
Ohmart, Teresa	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	04/01/2013
Tone, Staci	Individual	Contracted Managing Employee	NOT APPLICABLE	04/01/2013
Tone, Staci	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	04/01/2013

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
"If my family member is able to manage their own medications, would you allow it, and how is that decided?"
"Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
"What written notices do we get before any transfer or discharge, and what is your bed-hold policy?"
"How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
"What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
"What mental health services do you offer on-site, and how do you care for residents with depression, anxiety, or a history of trauma?"
"How do residents get dental care here — is there a dentist who visits, and how are appointments arranged?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Fernhill Rehabilitation and Care	1.7 mi	Portland, OR	★★☆☆☆	2/5	abuse
Porthaven Post Acute	2.9 mi	Portland, OR	★★★☆☆	2/5
Holladay Park Plaza	3.2 mi	Portland, OR	★★★★★	5/5
Providence Child Center	4.1 mi	Portland, OR	★★★★★	5/5
Laurelhurst Post Acute & Rehabilitation	4.3 mi	Portland, OR	★★☆☆☆	2/5
The Oaks at Timberline	4.7 mi	Vancouver, WA	★★★★★	5/5
Evergreen Post Acute	4.8 mi	Portland, OR	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Hudson Bay Health and Rehabilitation	4.8 mi	Vancouver, WA	★★★★★	5/5
Belmont Care and Rehabilitation	4.8 mi	Portland, OR	★☆☆☆☆	2/5
Vancouver Specialty and Rehab Care	4.9 mi	Vancouver, WA	★★★★☆	4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Portland →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 385208.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Marquis Piedmont Post Acute Rehab

319 NE Russet, Portland, OR 97211 · 5032895571

Health inspection rating 4/5 · CMS overall 4/5· Fines (3y): $0

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
☐ "If my family member is able to manage their own medications, would you allow it, and how is that decided?"
☐ "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
☐ "What written notices do we get before any transfer or discharge, and what is your bed-hold policy?"
☐ "How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
☐ "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
☐ "What mental health services do you offer on-site, and how do you care for residents with depression, anxiety, or a history of trauma?"
☐ "How do residents get dental care here — is there a dentist who visits, and how are appointments arranged?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 385208 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)