How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Marquis Piedmont Post Acute Rehab
319 NE Russet, Portland, OR 97211 (opens Google Maps) · Multnomah County · (503) 289-5571· 70 certified beds · avg 47 residents/day · certified since Sep 14, 1989 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: MARQUIS COMPANIES (15 facilities, chain avg rating 4.3★)
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Apr 10, 2026
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
6.22
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 18 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. F-0761
The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. F-0554
The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint F-0600
View all 18 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Apr 10, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate. · F-0554 |
| Apr 10, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Apr 10, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay). · F-0628 |
| Apr 10, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Apr 10, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Apr 10, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate treatment and services to residents with a mental health condition, difficulty adjusting emotionally, or a history of trauma or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). · F-0742 |
| Apr 10, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care. · F-0791 |
| Dec 6, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Dec 6, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Sep 30, 2024 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint · F-0725 |
| Sep 30, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not post its nurse staffing information every day. Nursing homes must publicly display how many nurses and aides are on duty each day. · from a complaint · F-0732 |
| Sep 30, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint · F-0550 |
| Sep 30, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677 |
| Mar 2, 2020 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Mar 2, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Mar 2, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Mar 2, 2020 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (2 → 8).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2020
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 8
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 4 | 0 | F |
| 2024 | 6 | 0 | F |
| 2026 | 8 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityOregon averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 6.22
Oregon average: 5.42
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.94
Oregon average: 0.78
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 5.56
Oregon average: 4.85
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Oregon avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 6.22 | 5.42 | 3.95 | top 8% in Oregon; top 3% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.94 | 0.78 | 0.69 | top 21% in Oregon; top 18% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 5.56 | 4.85 | 3.50 | top 12% in Oregon; top 3% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.44 | 0.48 | 0.48 | top 38% in Oregon; top 41% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 60.4 | 47.4 | 45.8 | bottom 20% in Oregon; bottom 16% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 62.5 | 51.6 | 42.9 | bottom 33% in Oregon; bottom 19% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 6.20, RN 0.94, weekend 5.54.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (6.20 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Marquis Piedmont Post Acute Rehab. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fogg, Phillip | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 100% | 06/22/2012 |
| Marquis Companies I, INC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 04/01/2013 |
| English, Meagan | Individual | Contracted Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2013 |
| English, Meagan | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2013 |
| Fogg, Phillip | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/22/2012 |
| Fogg, Steven | Individual | Contracted Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2013 |
| Fogg, Steven | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/22/2012 |
| Fogg, Steven | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2013 |
| Levee, Kathleen | Individual | Contracted Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2013 |
| Levee, Kathleen | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2013 |
| Marquis Companies I, INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2013 |
| Ohmart, Teresa | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2013 |
| Tone, Staci | Individual | Contracted Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2013 |
| Tone, Staci | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2013 |
All 14 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Marquis Companies — 15 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Marquis Plum Ridge Post Acute Rehab — Klamath Falls, OR · overall 5/5
- Marquis Springfield — Springfield, OR · overall 4/5
- Marquis Tualatin Post Acute Rehab — Tualatin, OR · overall 5/5
- Marquis Vermont Hills — Portland, OR · overall 5/5
- Marquis Wilsonville Post Acute Rehab — Wilsonville, OR · overall 5/5
- Marquis Care at Shasta — Redding, CA · overall 2/5
- Marquis Care at Centennial Hills — Las Vegas, NV · overall 4/5
- Marquis Plaza Regency Post Acute Rehab — Las Vegas, NV · overall 4/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 14 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "If my family member is able to manage their own medications, would you allow it, and how is that decided?"
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "What written notices do we get before any transfer or discharge, and what is your bed-hold policy?"
- "How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "What mental health services do you offer on-site, and how do you care for residents with depression, anxiety, or a history of trauma?"
- "How do residents get dental care here — is there a dentist who visits, and how are appointments arranged?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 60% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 14 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 58 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fernhill Rehabilitation and Care | 1.7 mi | Portland, OR | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Porthaven Post Acute | 2.9 mi | Portland, OR | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Holladay Park Plaza | 3.2 mi | Portland, OR | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Providence Child Center | 4.1 mi | Portland, OR | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Laurelhurst Post Acute & Rehabilitation | 4.3 mi | Portland, OR | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Oaks at Timberline | 4.7 mi | Vancouver, WA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Evergreen Post Acute | 4.8 mi | Portland, OR | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Hudson Bay Health and Rehabilitation | 4.8 mi | Vancouver, WA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Belmont Care and Rehabilitation | 4.8 mi | Portland, OR | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Vancouver Specialty and Rehab Care | 4.9 mi | Vancouver, WA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Mt. Tabor Health & Rehabilitation | 5.1 mi | Portland, OR | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Mirabella Portland | 5.6 mi | Portland, OR | ★★★★★ | 5/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Multnomah, OR — 33 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Marquis Vermont Hills — Portland, OR · overall 5/5
- Menlo Park Post Acute — Portland, OR · overall 2/5
- Portland Health and Rehabilitation — Portland, OR · overall 1/5
- Reedwood Post Acute — Portland, OR · overall 5/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 385208.