How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
441 Werth Blvd, Newberg, OR 97132 (opens Google Maps) · Yamhill County · (503) 538-9436· 54 certified beds · avg 47 residents/day · certified since May 27, 1988 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: MARQUIS COMPANIES (15 facilities, chain avg rating 4.3★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 12 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not allow a resident's chosen representative — often a family member or someone with power of attorney — to exercise the resident's rights on their behalf. When a resident can't speak for themselves, their representative steps into that role. F-0551
The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. F-0688
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not allow a resident's chosen representative — often a family member or someone with power of attorney — to exercise the resident's rights on their behalf. When a resident can't speak for themselves, their representative steps into that role. · F-0551 |
| Jan 16, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Jan 16, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Sep 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Feb 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint · F-0580 |
| Feb 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint · F-0726 |
| Jun 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Jun 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Jun 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Jun 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · F-0725 |
| Jun 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Jun 16, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (1 → 3).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 6 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 3 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 3 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Oregon avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 5.25 | 5.42 | 3.95 | bottom 39% in Oregon; top 10% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.53 | 0.78 | 0.69 | bottom 26% in Oregon; bottom 42% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 4.71 | 4.85 | 3.50 | bottom 40% in Oregon; top 9% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.26 | 0.48 | 0.48 | bottom 16% in Oregon; bottom 23% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 39.7 | 47.4 | 45.8 | top 27% in Oregon; top 35% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 57.1 | 51.6 | 42.9 | bottom 43% in Oregon; bottom 26% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.00, RN 0.50, weekend 4.48.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (5.00 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Marquis Newberg. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fogg, Phillip | Individual | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 11/23/2009 |
| Marquis Companies I, INC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 02/01/2010 |
| Fogg, Phillip | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/23/2009 |
| Fogg, Phillip | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/23/2009 |
| Fogg, Steven | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/23/2009 |
| Fogg, Steven | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/23/2009 |
| Tone, Staci | Individual | W-2 Managing Employee | NOT APPLICABLE | 11/23/2009 |
All 7 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Marquis Companies — 15 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 14 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chehalem Post Acute | 1.0 mi | Newberg, OR | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Marquis Wilsonville Post Acute Rehab | 8.3 mi | Wilsonville, OR | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Avamere Rehabilitation of King City | 9.6 mi | Tigard, OR | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Marquis Tualatin Post Acute Rehab | 9.7 mi | Tualatin, OR | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Tigard Rehabilitation and Care | 10.8 mi | Tigard, OR | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| French Prairie Nursing & Rehabilitation Center | 11.1 mi | Woodburn, OR | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Marquis Hope Village | 12.7 mi | Canby, OR | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Life Care Center of McMinnville | 13.2 mi | McMinnville, OR | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| The Pearl at Kruse Way | 13.4 mi | Lake Oswego, OR | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Evan Terrace Post Acute | 13.7 mi | McMinnville, OR | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Maryville | 13.7 mi | Beaverton, OR | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Beaverton Post Acute Care of Cascadia | 13.8 mi | Beaverton, OR | ★★★★★ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Yamhill, OR — 6 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 385180.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details