OregonNewberg

Marquis Newberg

441 Werth Blvd, Newberg, OR 97132 · Yamhill County · 54 certified beds · avg 47 residents/day · certified since May 27, 1988

Part of chain: MARQUIS COMPANIES (15 facilities, chain avg rating 4.3★)

5/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
5.25
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (12)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jan 16, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow a resident's chosen representative — often a family member or someone with power of attorney — to exercise the resident's rights on their behalf. When a resident can't speak for themselves, their representative steps into that role.
Jan 16, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Jan 16, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Sep 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Feb 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint
Feb 26, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint
Jun 16, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Jun 16, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Jun 16, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jun 16, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
Jun 16, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jun 16, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (1 → 3).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202360D
202430D
202630D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityOregon avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.255.423.95bottom 39% in Oregon; top 10% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.530.780.69bottom 26% in Oregon; bottom 42% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.714.853.50bottom 40% in Oregon; top 9% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.260.480.48bottom 16% in Oregon; bottom 23% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)39.747.445.8top 27% in Oregon; top 35% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)57.151.642.9bottom 43% in Oregon; bottom 26% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.00, RN 0.50, weekend 4.48. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Fogg, PhillipIndividual5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest11/23/2009
Marquis Companies I, INCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%02/01/2010
Fogg, PhillipIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE11/23/2009
Fogg, PhillipIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/23/2009
Fogg, StevenIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE11/23/2009
Fogg, StevenIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/23/2009
Tone, StaciIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE11/23/2009

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Chehalem Post Acute1.0 miNewberg, OR★☆☆☆☆1/5
Marquis Wilsonville Post Acute Rehab8.3 miWilsonville, OR★★★★★5/5
Avamere Rehabilitation of King City9.6 miTigard, OR★★★★☆3/5
Marquis Tualatin Post Acute Rehab9.7 miTualatin, OR★★★★★4/5
Tigard Rehabilitation and Care10.8 miTigard, OR★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
French Prairie Nursing & Rehabilitation Center11.1 miWoodburn, OR★☆☆☆☆1/5SFF
Marquis Hope Village12.7 miCanby, OR★★★★☆4/5
Life Care Center of McMinnville13.2 miMcMinnville, OR★★★★☆3/5
The Pearl at Kruse Way13.4 miLake Oswego, OR★★★★☆4/5
Evan Terrace Post Acute13.7 miMcMinnville, OR★☆☆☆☆1/5
Maryville13.7 miBeaverton, OR★★★★☆3/5
Beaverton Post Acute Care of Cascadia13.8 miBeaverton, OR★★★★★4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Newberg →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 385180.