NevadaLas Vegas

Saint Joseph Transitional Rehabilitation Center

2035 W. Charleston Blvd., Las Vegas, NV 89102 · Clark County · 100 certified beds · avg 93 residents/day · certified since Jan 19, 1988

Part of chain: GENESIS HEALTHCARE (184 facilities, chain avg rating 2.4★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.62
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (24)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Sep 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not let a resident help develop and carry out their own plan of care — the written roadmap of the services and support they'll receive, built around their personal goals and preferences.
Sep 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way.
Sep 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition.
Sep 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Sep 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Sep 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Sep 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Sep 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Sep 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Sep 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Sep 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly hold, secure, and manage residents' personal money that was deposited with it for safekeeping. Facilities holding residents' funds must keep careful, honest accounts.
Sep 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly.
Sep 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Sep 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Sep 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Sep 19, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Sep 22, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Sep 22, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to make their own choices about their daily lives, such as when to wake up, what to eat, or how to spend their time.
Sep 22, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment.
Sep 22, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Sep 22, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Sep 22, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Sep 22, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Sep 22, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 10).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202380E
202460D
2025100D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNevada avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)2.624.053.95bottom 1% in Nevada; bottom 5% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.620.980.69bottom 27% in Nevada; top 45% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.503.613.50bottom 1% in Nevada; bottom 9% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.680.870.48top 48% in Nevada; top 17% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)39.245.145.8top 31% in Nevada; top 34% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)38.943.442.9top 43% in Nevada; top 45% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.82, RN 0.91, weekend 3.65. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Bold Quail Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest02/01/2021
BQ Operations Holdings LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%02/01/2021
Newgen LLCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest02/01/2021
Robin, AaronIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest02/01/2021
Tress, AvrohomIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest02/01/2021
2035 West Charleston Boulevard Property LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2021
BQ Realty Holdings LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/03/2026
Shaw, PamelaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2021

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Silver State Pediatric Skilled Nursing Facility0.6 miLas Vegas, NV★★★★★4/5
Horizon Health and Rehabilitation Center1.4 miLas Vegas, NV★★☆☆☆2/5
Las Vegas Post Acute & Rehabilitation2.2 miLas Vegas, NV★★★★☆4/5
Premier Health & Rehabilitation Center of LV, LP2.7 miLas Vegas, NV★★★★☆4/5
Silver Ridge Healthcare Center3.4 miLas Vegas, NV★★★★☆3/5
Torrey Pines Post Acute and Rehabilitation3.4 miLas Vegas, NV★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Life Care Center of Las Vegas3.9 miLas Vegas, NV★★★☆☆3/5
Trellis Paradise4.4 miLas Vegas, NV★★★★★4/5
Harmon Hospital - SNF4.5 miLas Vegas, NV★★★★★5/5
Life Care Center of South Las Vegas4.5 miLas Vegas, NV★★☆☆☆1/5SFF
Marquis Plaza Regency Post Acute Rehab5.2 miLas Vegas, NV★★★★☆4/5
College Park Rehabilitation Center5.3 miNorth Las Vegas, NV★★★★☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Las Vegas →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 295040.