OregonOregon City

Marquis Oregon City Post Acute Rehab

1680 Molalla Avenue, Oregon City, OR 97045 · Clackamas County · 102 certified beds · avg 50 residents/day · certified since Oct 16, 1990

Part of chain: MARQUIS COMPANIES (15 facilities, chain avg rating 4.3★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
5.60
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (13)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Feb 27, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Feb 27, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Oct 24, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Oct 24, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · from a complaint
Oct 24, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · from a complaint
Oct 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Oct 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint
Oct 24, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. · from a complaint
Jul 29, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Aug 30, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Aug 30, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Aug 30, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Aug 30, 2019D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 2).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
201940D
202470E
202620F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityOregon avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.605.423.95top 34% in Oregon; top 6% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.640.780.69bottom 46% in Oregon; top 43% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing5.034.853.50top 33% in Oregon; top 6% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.320.480.48bottom 33% in Oregon; bottom 36% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)24.747.445.8top 4% in Oregon; top 7% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)25.051.642.9top 12% in Oregon; top 20% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.05, RN 0.58, weekend 4.54. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Fogg, PhillipIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest100%06/22/2012
Marquis Companies I, INCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%04/01/2013
Bucher, AmyIndividualContracted Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2013
Bucher, AmyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2013
Fogg, PhillipIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/22/2012
Fogg, StevenIndividualContracted Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2013
Fogg, StevenIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/22/2012
Fogg, StevenIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2013
Levee, KathleenIndividualContracted Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2013
Levee, KathleenIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2013
Marquis Companies I, INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2013
Olum, AprilIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2013
Tone, StaciIndividualContracted Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2013
Tone, StaciIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2013

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Rivercrest Post Acute0.6 miOregon City, OR★★☆☆☆2/5
Avamere Rehabilitation of Oregon City1.5 miOregon City, OR★★☆☆☆2/5
Avamere Rehabilitation of Clackamas3.5 miGladstone, OR★★★★☆3/5
Rose Linn Care Center3.7 miWest Linn, OR★★★☆☆4/5
Fernwood Supportive Living at Madrona Grove7.0 miPortland, OR★★★★☆3/5
Willamette View Health Center7.1 miMilwaukie, OR★★★★★5/5
Stanley Post Acute7.2 miMilwaukie, OR★★★☆☆3/5
Marquis Hope Village7.6 miCanby, OR★★★★☆4/5
The Pearl at Kruse Way8.7 miLake Oswego, OR★★★★☆4/5
Marquis Wilsonville Post Acute Rehab9.1 miWilsonville, OR★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Oregon City →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 385221.