WashingtonVancouver

Hudson Bay Health and Rehabilitation

8507 Northeast 8th Way, Vancouver, WA 98664 · Clark County · 92 certified beds · avg 77 residents/day · certified since Oct 16, 1981

Part of chain: CASCADIA HEALTHCARE (46 facilities, chain avg rating 3.0★)

5/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.91
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (17)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Mar 19, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Mar 19, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not let a resident help develop and carry out their own plan of care — the written roadmap of the services and support they'll receive, built around their personal goals and preferences.
Mar 19, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Mar 19, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Mar 19, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Mar 19, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Apr 24, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Apr 24, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Apr 24, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide necessary behavioral health care and services — support for residents' mental and emotional wellbeing, including conditions like depression and anxiety.
Apr 24, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Apr 24, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not regularly inspect bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails for safety, or the rails and mattresses were not attached safely to the frames.
Sep 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Jun 7, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jun 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jun 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide food that accounts for each resident's allergies, intolerances, and personal preferences, or did not offer appealing alternatives. · from a complaint
Jun 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.
Sep 22, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not verify that its nurse aides had completed their required training, or did not retrain aides who had been out of nurse aide work for 2 years. · from a complaint

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (5 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202310E
202450F
202550E
202660E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityWashington avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.914.243.95bottom 43% in Washington; top 43% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.930.910.69top 38% in Washington; top 19% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.543.693.50top 42% in Washington; top 40% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.740.670.48top 34% in Washington; top 14% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)58.145.145.8bottom 16% in Washington; bottom 19% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)73.945.442.9bottom 9% in Washington; bottom 9% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.94, RN 0.94, weekend 3.57. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Cascadia HC Group LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/05/2025
Cascadia Healthcare LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2021
Cascadia Holdco LLCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/05/2025
Cascadia Washington Operations LLCOrganizationDirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2021
Hammond, OwenIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2021
Laforte, StephenIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/05/2025
Nelson, TimothyIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/05/2025
Cascadia Services LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/21/2025
Cascadia Services LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/21/2025
Dinh, DieuIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/24/2024
Dinh, DieuIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/26/2025
Hammond, OwenIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/01/2021
Laforte, StephenIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/05/2025
Nelson, TimothyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE06/05/2025
Riley, CraigIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2023
Riley, CraigIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/26/2025
Timberline Ohi Tenant LLCOrganization5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/05/2025
Timberline Ohi Tenant LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/05/2025
White Oak Healthcare Finance LLCOrganization5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/11/2022

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Vancouver Specialty and Rehab Care0.1 miVancouver, WA★★★★☆4/5
Avamere Rehabilitation of Cascade Park3.5 miVancouver, WA★★★★★4/5
The Oaks at Timberline4.1 miVancouver, WA★★★★★5/5
Bridge Crest Post Acute4.5 miVancouver, WA★★☆☆☆2/5
Fernhill Rehabilitation and Care4.7 miPortland, OR★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Marquis Piedmont Post Acute Rehab4.8 miPortland, OR★★★★☆4/5
Porthaven Post Acute5.0 miPortland, OR★★★☆☆2/5
Evergreen Post Acute5.4 miPortland, OR★★☆☆☆2/5
Rose City Nursing and Rehabilitation6.7 miPortland, OR★★★☆☆3/5
Providence Child Center6.8 miPortland, OR★★★★★5/5
Salmon Creek Post Acute & Rehabilitation7.0 miVancouver, WA★★★☆☆3/5
Glisan Post Acute7.1 miPortland, OR★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Vancouver →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 505260.