Marquis Springfield

Name: Marquis Springfield
Address: 1333 N. FIRST STREET, Springfield, OR, 97477, US
Telephone: 5417362700

1333 N. First Street, Springfield, OR 97477 · Lane County · 136 certified beds · avg 76 residents/day · certified since Jan 1, 1971 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: MARQUIS COMPANIES (15 facilities, chain avg rating 4.3★)

3/5

Health inspection rating (on-site)

Serious findings on record

Fines, last 3 years

5.40

Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (33)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

Date	Severity	What the facility was cited for
Jan 5, 2026	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Jan 5, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand.
Jan 5, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Jan 5, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide required paperwork or notices about a resident's needs, their right to appeal a transfer or discharge, or the facility's bed-hold policy (how long a bed is saved during a hospital stay).
Jan 5, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Jan 5, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jan 5, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jan 5, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Jan 5, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not prevent a resident from becoming increasingly withdrawn, angry, or depressed, or from losing social connection, when that decline was avoidable.
Jan 5, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Jan 5, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jan 5, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
Jan 5, 2026	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
Dec 5, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint
Dec 5, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Aug 2, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Aug 2, 2024	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint
Aug 2, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · from a complaint
Aug 2, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · from a complaint
Aug 2, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not fully assess residents on time — a complete assessment of health, abilities, and needs is required when a resident is first admitted and at least once every 12 months after that. · from a complaint
Aug 2, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · from a complaint
Aug 2, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Aug 2, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · from a complaint
Aug 2, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · from a complaint
Aug 2, 2024	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not bring in qualified outside professionals to provide a required service when it didn't have a qualified professional on staff. · from a complaint
Apr 7, 2023	E · Potential for harm, repeated	The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Apr 7, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Apr 7, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Apr 7, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Apr 7, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Apr 7, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Apr 7, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Apr 7, 2023	D · Potential for harm, one-off	The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (10 → 13).

Year	Citations	Worst severity that year
2023	8	E
2024	12	E
2026	13	E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

Measure	This facility	Oregon avg	U.S. avg	Where it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)	5.40	5.42	3.95	top 46% in Oregon; top 8% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours	0.76	0.78	0.69	top 37% in Oregon; top 30% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing	4.74	4.85	3.50	bottom 43% in Oregon; top 9% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)	0.31	0.48	0.48	bottom 26% in Oregon; bottom 33% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)	29.7	47.4	45.8	top 6% in Oregon; top 14% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)	16.7	51.6	42.9	top 4% in Oregon; top 9% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.26, RN 0.74, weekend 4.61. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / manager	Type	Role	Stake	Since
Fogg, Phillip	Individual	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	—	07/01/1998
Marquis Companies I, INC	Organization	5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest	—	07/01/1998
Bucher, Amy	Individual	W-2 Managing Employee	NOT APPLICABLE	12/01/2007
Fogg, Phillip	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	07/01/1998
Fogg, Steven	Individual	W-2 Managing Employee	NOT APPLICABLE	10/16/2001
Fogg, Steven	Individual	Corporate Officer	NOT APPLICABLE	10/16/2001
Kittrell, Russ	Individual	Operational/Managerial Control	NOT APPLICABLE	05/15/2002
Levee, Kathleen	Individual	W-2 Managing Employee	NOT APPLICABLE	01/01/2006
Tone, Staci	Individual	W-2 Managing Employee	NOT APPLICABLE	07/01/1998

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

"Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
"How do you explain health changes and treatment options to residents and their families?"
"If someone reports suspected abuse or neglect here, what happens in the first 24 hours?"
"What written notices do we get before any transfer or discharge, and what is your bed-hold policy?"
"Can I see this month's activities calendar, and what do you offer residents who can't leave their rooms?"
"How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
"What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
"How do you monitor residents' weight and eating, and what happens when someone starts losing weight?"
"What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
"Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

Facility	Distance	City	Overall	Inspection	Flags
Green Valley Rehabilitation Health Center	3.4 mi	Eugene, OR	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
South Hills Rehabilitation Center	4.1 mi	Eugene, OR	★☆☆☆☆	1/5	abuseSFF
Creekside Health and Rehabilitation of Cascadia	4.4 mi	Eugene, OR	★★★★★	4/5
Cascade Manor	4.6 mi	Eugene, OR	★★★★☆	4/5
Avamere Riverpark of Eugene	5.2 mi	Eugene, OR	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Hillside Heights Rehabilitation Center	5.5 mi	Eugene, OR	★★★☆☆	3/5
Avamere Rehabilitation of Eugene	5.7 mi	Eugene, OR	★☆☆☆☆	1/5
Valley West Health Care Center	7.2 mi	Eugene, OR	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Creswell Post Acute	10.1 mi	Creswell, OR	★★☆☆☆	2/5
Avamere Rehabilitation of Junction City	14.5 mi	Junction City, OR	★★★★☆	3/5
Cottage Grove Post Acute	19.3 mi	Cottage Grove, OR	★★★☆☆	3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Springfield →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 385077.

The Care File

Visit checklist — Marquis Springfield

1333 N. First Street, Springfield, OR 97477 · 5417362700

Health inspection rating 3/5 · CMS overall 4/5· Fines (3y): $0

Questions for the administrator:

☐ "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
☐ "How do you explain health changes and treatment options to residents and their families?"
☐ "If someone reports suspected abuse or neglect here, what happens in the first 24 hours?"
☐ "What written notices do we get before any transfer or discharge, and what is your bed-hold policy?"
☐ "Can I see this month's activities calendar, and what do you offer residents who can't leave their rooms?"
☐ "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
☐ "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
☐ "How do you monitor residents' weight and eating, and what happens when someone starts losing weight?"
☐ "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
☐ "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"

While you're there, notice:

☐ Smell and cleanliness in hallways, not just the lobby
☐ How staff speak to residents; call lights answered promptly
☐ Residents up, dressed, and engaged (visit mealtimes and a weekend if you can)

Data: CMS Provider Data Catalog, version 2026-08-01 · CCN 385077 · Verify at medicare.gov/care-compare · Printed from The Care File (thecarefile.com)