How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
400 East 33rd Street, Vancouver, WA 98663 (opens Google Maps) · Clark County · (360) 696-2561· 85 certified beds · avg 66 residents/day · certified since Nov 9, 1970 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: THE ENSIGN GROUP (342 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★★5/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 14 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. F-0656
The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. F-0755
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Mar 5, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Mar 5, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jan 27, 2025 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jan 27, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint · F-0550 |
| Jan 27, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Jan 27, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · F-0644 |
| Jan 27, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645 |
| Jan 27, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Jan 27, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Jan 27, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Aug 12, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not verify that its nurse aides had completed their required training, or did not retrain aides who had been out of nurse aide work for 2 years. · from a complaint · F-0729 |
| Feb 7, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Feb 7, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (8 → 3).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 3 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 8 | 0 | F |
| 2026 | 3 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Washington avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.78 | 4.24 | 3.95 | bottom 35% in Washington; top 50% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.58 | 0.91 | 0.69 | bottom 9% in Washington; bottom 49% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.18 | 3.69 | 3.50 | bottom 25% in Washington; bottom 41% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.54 | 0.67 | 0.48 | bottom 37% in Washington; top 28% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 27.6 | 45.1 | 45.8 | top 7% in Washington; top 10% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 33.3 | 45.4 | 42.9 | top 26% in Washington; top 33% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.07, RN 0.62, weekend 3.43.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.07 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for The Oaks at Timberline. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burnam, Soon | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/22/2021 |
| Caretrust GP LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2021 |
| Caretrust Reit INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2021 |
| Ctr Partnership LP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2021 |
| Ensign Services INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/22/2021 |
| Farnsworth, Stephen | Individual | Corporate Director | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| Keetch, Chad | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2011 |
| Newberry, Collin | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2021 |
| Newberry, Collin | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2021 |
| Newberry, Collin | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/08/2025 |
| Port, Barry | Individual | Individual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/08/2025 |
| Riley, Craig | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2021 |
| Riley, Craig | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2021 |
| Riley, Craig | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/08/2025 |
| Ross, Steve | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2024 |
| Sato, Ami | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/09/2024 |
All 16 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain The Ensign Group — 342 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 341 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bridge Crest Post Acute | 1.0 mi | Vancouver, WA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Vancouver Specialty and Rehab Care | 4.0 mi | Vancouver, WA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Hudson Bay Health and Rehabilitation | 4.1 mi | Vancouver, WA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Marquis Piedmont Post Acute Rehab | 4.7 mi | Portland, OR | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Salmon Creek Post Acute & Rehabilitation | 5.5 mi | Vancouver, WA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Fernhill Rehabilitation and Care | 5.9 mi | Portland, OR | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Porthaven Post Acute | 6.8 mi | Portland, OR | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Avamere Rehabilitation of Cascade Park | 7.5 mi | Vancouver, WA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Holladay Park Plaza | 7.9 mi | Portland, OR | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Evergreen Post Acute | 8.2 mi | Portland, OR | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Providence Child Center | 8.5 mi | Portland, OR | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Laurelhurst Post Acute & Rehabilitation | 8.9 mi | Portland, OR | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Clark, WA — 8 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 505206.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details