1015 North Garrison Road, Vancouver, WA 98664 (opens Google Maps) · Clark County · (360) 694-7501· 104 certified beds · avg 88 residents/day · certified since Jul 1, 1982 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Actual harm, isolated · Oct 13, 2023 · F-0686 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Why it matters: Bedsores are painful, can become deeply infected, and in serious cases can be life-threatening.
Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Oct 27, 2023 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 25 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. F-0725
The facility did not provide a neutral and fair arbitration process. Arbitration is a way of settling disputes outside of court, and if it's used, the facility must agree with the resident on a neutral arbitrator and a convenient location. F-0848
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2026 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · F-0725 |
| Feb 24, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a neutral and fair arbitration process. Arbitration is a way of settling disputes outside of court, and if it's used, the facility must agree with the resident on a neutral arbitrator and a convenient location. · F-0848 |
| Feb 24, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Feb 24, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly notify residents about the balance of money it holds for them, or failed to return those funds when a resident was discharged, evicted, or died. · F-0569 |
| Feb 24, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function. · F-0605 |
| Feb 24, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Feb 24, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. · F-0676 |
| Feb 24, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes. · F-0678 |
| Feb 24, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. · F-0908 |
| Feb 24, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure resident rooms met each resident's needs. · F-0910 |
| Dec 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · from a complaint · F-0580 |
| Apr 29, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677 |
| Jan 9, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Jan 9, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing. · F-0727 |
| Jan 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure residents were fully informed about their own health, care, and treatments in a way they could understand. · from a complaint · F-0552 |
| Jan 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not let a resident help develop and carry out their own plan of care — the written roadmap of the services and support they'll receive, built around their personal goals and preferences. · from a complaint · F-0553 |
| Jan 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Jan 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge. Before a resident leaves, the facility must get them ready and make sure the move is safe and orderly. · from a complaint · F-0624 |
| Jan 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645 |
| Jan 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. · F-0730 |
| Jan 9, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Mar 21, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint · F-0610 |
| Mar 21, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Feb 21, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Oct 13, 2023 | ▲ G · Actual harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint · F-0686 |
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (9 → 10).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 1 | 1 | G ▲ |
| 2024 | 3 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 11 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 10 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $19,841.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2023 | Fine | $19,841 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Washington avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.37 | 4.24 | 3.95 | bottom 6% in Washington; bottom 30% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.58 | 0.91 | 0.69 | bottom 10% in Washington; bottom 50% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.33 | 3.69 | 3.50 | bottom 38% in Washington; bottom 49% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.73 | 0.67 | 0.48 | top 37% in Washington; top 15% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 52.8 | 45.1 | 45.8 | bottom 29% in Washington; bottom 30% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 44.4 | 45.4 | 42.9 | bottom 49% in Washington; bottom 45% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.85, RN 0.84, weekend 4.79.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (4.85 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 1/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Vancouver Specialty and Rehab Care. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Individual
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schmukler, Yehuda | Individual | Direct Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2018 |
| Edify Compliance LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Edify Compliance LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/28/2025 |
| Hansen Hunter LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Hansen Hunter LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/28/2025 |
| Khokhar, Abdul | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Khokhar, Abdul | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| LTC Consulting Services LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| LTC Consulting Services LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/28/2025 |
| Lynch, Charlien | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Lynch, Charlien | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Schmukler, Yehuda | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2018 |
| Schmukler, Yehuda | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/01/2018 |
All 13 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hudson Bay Health and Rehabilitation | 0.1 mi | Vancouver, WA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Avamere Rehabilitation of Cascade Park | 3.5 mi | Vancouver, WA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| The Oaks at Timberline | 4.0 mi | Vancouver, WA | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Bridge Crest Post Acute | 4.4 mi | Vancouver, WA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Fernhill Rehabilitation and Care | 4.8 mi | Portland, OR | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Marquis Piedmont Post Acute Rehab | 4.9 mi | Portland, OR | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Porthaven Post Acute | 5.1 mi | Portland, OR | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Evergreen Post Acute | 5.5 mi | Portland, OR | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Rose City Nursing and Rehabilitation | 6.8 mi | Portland, OR | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Salmon Creek Post Acute & Rehabilitation | 6.9 mi | Vancouver, WA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Providence Child Center | 6.9 mi | Portland, OR | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Glisan Post Acute | 7.2 mi | Portland, OR | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Clark, WA — 8 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 505269.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details