How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
9712 Mansfield Road, Shreveport, LA 71118 (opens Google Maps) · Caddo County · (318) 687-2080· 145 certified beds · avg 108 residents/day · certified since Apr 1, 1997 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: THE BEEBE FAMILY (48 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 17 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint F-0656
The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. F-0677
The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. F-0641
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Jan 14, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Jan 14, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · F-0641 |
| Dec 11, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Jul 22, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656 |
| Jul 22, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · from a complaint · F-0585 |
| Oct 30, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Oct 30, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Oct 30, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
| Oct 30, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. · F-0700 |
| Oct 30, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757 |
| Oct 30, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. · F-0758 |
| Oct 30, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582 |
| Nov 29, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · F-0578 |
| Nov 29, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693 |
| Nov 29, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Nov 29, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 2).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 4 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 7 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 3 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 3 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Louisiana avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 4.38 | 4.04 | 3.95 | top 28% in Louisiana; top 27% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.38 | 0.32 | 0.69 | top 18% in Louisiana; bottom 19% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.57 | 3.45 | 3.50 | top 38% in Louisiana; top 39% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.14 | 0.20 | 0.48 | bottom 46% in Louisiana; bottom 4% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 50.0 | 47.6 | 45.8 | bottom 40% in Louisiana; bottom 38% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 37.5 | 41.6 | 42.9 | top 43% in Louisiana; top 42% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.72, RN 0.32, weekend 3.04.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.72 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 2/5 · long-stay residents: 2/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Heritage Manor South. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Act Investments, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 15% | 01/01/2010 |
| David & Felicia Stallard Child Tr | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 01/01/2010 |
| Elton Glynn Beebe Jr. & Nancy Doty Beebe Irrv Tr Ua | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 5% | 01/01/2010 |
| Gerard and Alison Danos Childrens Tr | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 01/01/2010 |
| Joseph & Alison Sadler Children Tr | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | — | 01/01/2010 |
| Medico LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 85% | 01/01/2010 |
| Account Management Services INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2010 |
| Account Management Services INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2010 |
| Administrative Systems INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2010 |
| Administrative Systems INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2010 |
| Alisons 2016 Fam Tr No 2 | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Aria Care Management LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2022 |
| Banaka, Jacob | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/12/2020 |
| Banaka, Jacob | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/12/2020 |
| Bass, Pat | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/04/2021 |
| Bass, Pat | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/04/2021 |
| Beebe 2013 Childrens Tr NG | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2025 |
| Beebe, Bobby | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2013 |
| Beebe, Bobby | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2013 |
| Beebe, Elton | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2010 |
Showing 20 of 43 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 23 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain The Beebe Family — 48 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 47 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Guest House Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation | 1.3 mi | Shreveport, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| The Bradford Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation | 1.9 mi | Shreveport, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Southern Hills Healthcare and Rehabilitation | 2.0 mi | Shreveport, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Garden Park Nursing & Rehab Ctr, LLC | 3.9 mi | Shreveport, LA | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Heritage Manor West | 4.5 mi | Shreveport, LA | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Spring Lake Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation | 5.4 mi | Shreveport, LA | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Booker T. Washington Skilled Nursing and Rehabilit | 5.5 mi | Shreveport, LA | ★★☆☆☆ | 4/5 | |
| Village Health Care at the Glen | 5.7 mi | Shreveport, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Pierremont Healthcare Center | 6.5 mi | Shreveport, LA | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Live Oak | 6.6 mi | Shreveport, LA | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Roseview Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 7.1 mi | Shreveport, LA | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Progressive Care Center | 7.2 mi | Shreveport, LA | ★★★☆☆ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Caddo, LA — 22 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 195408.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details