MassachusettsPeabody

Continuing Care at Brooksby Village

400 Brooksby Village Drive, Peabody, MA 01960 · Essex County · 104 certified beds · avg 57 residents/day · certified since Mar 5, 2004

Part of chain: ERICKSON SENIOR LIVING (17 facilities, chain avg rating 4.2★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$167,099
Fines, last 3 years
5.51
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, repeated · Dec 23, 2024 · F-0684

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (H): Multiple residents were actually harmed by the same failure — a pattern of real harm, not an isolated incident.

Corrected: Feb 2, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (17)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jan 21, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility gave residents unnecessary mind-altering (psychotropic) medications, or used drugs in a way that restrained residents by dulling their ability to think, move, or function.
Jan 21, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jan 21, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Jan 21, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Jan 21, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Jun 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · from a complaint
Jan 7, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint
Dec 23, 2024▲ H · Actual harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Dec 23, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not give all staff the required training on its quality improvement program — the internal system for finding problems and making care better.
Dec 23, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Dec 23, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Dec 23, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.
Dec 23, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not conduct and document a facility-wide assessment of what staff, supplies, and resources it needs to care for its residents properly — during everyday operations, nights, weekends, and emergencies.
Dec 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Dec 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Dec 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Dec 23, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (10 → 5).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2024101H ▲
202520D
202650D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $167,099.

DateTypeAmount / length
Dec 23, 2024Fine$167,099

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMassachusetts avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.513.893.95top 5% in Massachusetts; top 7% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours1.690.650.69top 2% in Massachusetts; top 3% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing5.023.513.50top 4% in Massachusetts; top 6% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.930.460.48top 5% in Massachusetts; top 7% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)50.038.245.8bottom 18% in Massachusetts; bottom 38% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)44.442.642.9bottom 45% in Massachusetts; bottom 45% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.02, RN 1.54, weekend 4.57. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 1/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
National Senior Communities, INCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%01/14/2021
Arnold, CourtneyIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE03/18/2024
Arnold, CourtneyIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/18/2024
Bison, MichaelIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/09/2025
Brown, IanIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2023
Brown, PatriciaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2022
Butler, RichardIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2014
Clupper, KatherineIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2024
Colins, MaryIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2018
Colins, MaryIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/27/2021
Embley, MarkIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/27/2021
Embley, MarkIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/27/2021
Embley, MarkIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/27/2021
Erickson Senior Living LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/23/2020
Erickson Senior Living LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/13/2025
Erstad, EileenIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2018
Erstad, EileenIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2018
Gantert, NealIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2018
Gantert, NealIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2018
Gantert, NealIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2018

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Alliance Health at Rosewood1.1 miPeabody, MA★★★☆☆3/5
Care One at Peabody1.1 miPeabody, MA★★★★★5/5
Pilgrim Rehabilitation & Skilled Nursing Center1.8 miPeabody, MA★★★★☆4/5
Hathorne Hill Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center1.9 miDanvers, MA★★★★☆4/5
Hunt Nursing & Rehab Center2.1 miDanvers, MA★★★★☆4/5
Twin Oaks Center2.3 miDanvers, MA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Jeffrey & Susan Brudnick Center for Living2.5 miPeabody, MA★★★★★4/5
Brentwood Rehabilitation and Healthcare Ctr (the)2.7 miDanvers, MA★★★★☆4/5
New England Homes for the Deaf, INC2.7 miDanvers, MA★★★★☆3/5
Ledgewood Rehabilitation and Nursing Center5.1 miBeverly, MA★★★★☆4/5
Blueberry Hill Rehabilitation and Healthcare Ctr5.2 miBeverly, MA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Life Care Center of the North Shore5.4 miLynn, MA★★★★★4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Peabody →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 225767.