MassachusettsPeabody

Alliance Health at Rosewood

22 Johnson Street, Peabody, MA 01961 · Essex County · 135 certified beds · avg 119 residents/day · certified since Oct 13, 1994

Part of chain: ALLIANCE HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES (8 facilities, chain avg rating 3.8★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$8,824
Fines, last 3 years
3.29
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Mar 5, 2024 · F-0760 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.

Why it matters: A serious medication error can cause real harm, hospitalization, or worse.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Feb 22, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)

All citations in the current public record (25)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jan 23, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jan 23, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Jan 23, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jan 23, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Jan 23, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Jan 23, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Jan 23, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Jan 23, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 23, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Jan 23, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jan 23, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Jan 23, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Jan 23, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits.
Jan 23, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Mar 5, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · from a complaint
Mar 5, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly plan a resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs after leaving. · from a complaint
Jan 4, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Jan 4, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 4, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jan 4, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Jan 4, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Jan 4, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Jan 4, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not safely and appropriately administer IV fluids (fluids given through a vein) for residents who needed them.
Jan 4, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail.
Jan 4, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide routine dental care and 24-hour emergency dental care for residents.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (9 → 5).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2024111G ▲
202590E
202650E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $8,824.

DateTypeAmount / length
Mar 5, 2024Fine$8,824

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMassachusetts avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.293.893.95bottom 19% in Massachusetts; bottom 26% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.740.650.69top 25% in Massachusetts; top 33% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.913.513.50bottom 15% in Massachusetts; bottom 26% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.430.460.48top 42% in Massachusetts; top 42% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)40.738.245.8bottom 40% in Massachusetts; top 38% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)42.942.642.9bottom 49% in Massachusetts; bottom 49% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.36, RN 0.75, weekend 2.97. Staffing rating: 3/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Alliance Health INCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%12/14/1999
Alliance Health Management Services LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/01/2013
Alliance Health Management Services LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/03/2025
Brunetti, TammyIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE03/06/2019
Calkins, AndrewIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE03/06/2017
Corridan, LindaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/17/2008
Grady, FrancisIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE03/22/2005
Grady, FrancisIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/22/2016
Gray, AlfredIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE03/06/2019
Janisko, JeromeIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/25/1999
Jennings, MichaelIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE09/25/2024
Jones, ErikIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE11/26/2018
Kemp, PaulIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/22/2016
Lavallee, ThomasIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/22/2016
Lucas, LarissaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2019
Lucas, LarissaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/03/2025
Lument Real Estate Capital LLCOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2024
McPherson, StephanieIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/13/2020
McPherson, StephanieIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/03/2025
Mourtzinos, ArthurIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE06/19/2014

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Continuing Care at Brooksby Village1.1 miPeabody, MA★★★★☆3/5
Care One at Peabody2.2 miPeabody, MA★★★★★5/5
Pilgrim Rehabilitation & Skilled Nursing Center2.3 miPeabody, MA★★★★☆4/5
Jeffrey & Susan Brudnick Center for Living2.5 miPeabody, MA★★★★★4/5
Hathorne Hill Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center2.5 miDanvers, MA★★★★☆4/5
Hunt Nursing & Rehab Center3.1 miDanvers, MA★★★★☆4/5
Twin Oaks Center3.4 miDanvers, MA★☆☆☆☆1/5
New England Homes for the Deaf, INC3.8 miDanvers, MA★★★★☆3/5
Brentwood Rehabilitation and Healthcare Ctr (the)3.8 miDanvers, MA★★★★☆4/5
Regalcare at Wakefield5.0 miWakefield, MA★☆☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Peabody →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 225651.