Massachusetts ›Hingham

Linden Ponds

Costs & paymentPlan a visit

400 Linden Ponds Way, Hingham, MA 02043 (opens Google Maps) · Plymouth County · (781) 534-7088· 132 certified beds · avg 65 residents/day · certified since Mar 12, 2009 · Medicare and Medicaid certified

Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →

Part of chain: ERICKSON SENIOR LIVING (17 facilities, chain avg rating 4.2★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Apr 30, 2026
2
Serious findings on record
most recent Feb 11, 2026
$12,735
Fines, last 3 years
5.47
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

New to these records? How to read an inspection report →

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, isolated · Feb 11, 2026 · F-0656 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.

Why it matters: Without a complete, working care plan, important needs can slip through the cracks and no one is accountable for results.

Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: Jan 20, 2026 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Actual harm, isolated · Feb 11, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): Actual harm was cited, below immediate jeopardy. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.

Corrected: Jan 20, 2026 (Past Non-Compliance)

Inspection findings in the public record

Showing the latest 3 of 6 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.

  1. E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern

    The facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council. F-0565

  2. D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated

    The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880

  3. G · Actual harm, isolated

    The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint F-0656

View all 6 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Apr 30, 2026E · Potential for more than minimal harm, patternThe facility did not honor residents' right to form and take part in resident or family groups, such as a resident council. · F-0565
Apr 30, 2026D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880
Feb 11, 2026▲ G · Actual harm, isolatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint · F-0656
Feb 11, 2026▲ G · Actual harm, isolatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689
Apr 15, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609
Feb 26, 2025D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (1 → 2).

Citations by recorded inspection yearPublished citation counts, not a quality score · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2025
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2026
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 2

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202520D
202642G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

How to file a complaint about care →

1 fine totaling $12,735.

Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.

DateTypeAmount / length
Feb 11, 2026Fine$12,735

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

What these staffing numbers mean →

Nurse time, in contextAdjusted hours per resident per day · Source: CMS, 2026-08-01
This facilityMassachusetts averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 5.47
Massachusetts average: 3.89
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.87
Massachusetts average: 0.65
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 4.80
Massachusetts average: 3.51
U.S. average: 3.50

All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.

MeasureThis facilityMassachusetts avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)5.473.893.95top 5% in Massachusetts; top 8% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.870.650.69top 14% in Massachusetts; top 23% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.803.513.50top 5% in Massachusetts; top 8% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.260.460.48bottom 20% in Massachusetts; bottom 24% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)41.038.245.8bottom 39% in Massachusetts; top 39% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)53.342.642.9bottom 28% in Massachusetts; bottom 31% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 5.15, RN 0.82, weekend 4.52.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (5.15 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Quality measures: assessments & claims

Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Costs & payment

Price evidence · separate from quality

No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Linden Ponds. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.

Calculate a stay from a quote you receive

Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.

Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.

Before you compare prices

  • Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
  • Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
  • Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.

Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price

Who owns this facility

How to read ownership records →

Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
National Senior Communities, INCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%01/14/2021
Bison, MichaelIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/16/2025
Brown, IanIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2023
Brown, PatriciaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2022
Butler, RichardIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2014
Clupper, KatherineIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2024
Colins, MaryIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2018
Colins, MaryIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2019
Embley, MarkIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/27/2021
Embley, MarkIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/27/2021
Embley, MarkIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/27/2021
Erickson Senior Living LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/23/2020
Erickson Senior Living LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/13/2025
Erstad, EileenIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2018
Erstad, EileenIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2018
Galanis, ChristinaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/14/2020
Galanis, ChristinaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/14/2020
Gantert, NealIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2018
Gantert, NealIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2018
Gantert, NealIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2018

Showing 20 of 47 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 27 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.

Other facilities in the same chain

CMS lists this facility under the chain Erickson Senior Living — 17 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.

Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 16 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.

Questions to ask on your visit

Full visit checklist →

Print visit checklist

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

  • "Can you show me an example care plan, and how are families included when it's created and updated?"
  • "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
  • "Does your facility have an active resident council, and how does management respond to its concerns?"
  • "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
  • "When abuse or theft is suspected, who do you notify, how fast, and how do you inform the family?"
  • "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"

Also worth asking anywhere

  • "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
  • "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
  • "CMS reports 41% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
  • "The ownership record on file lists 47 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
  • "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"

Nearby facilities (12 closest of 88 within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Queen Anne Nursing Home, INC1.1 miHingham, MA★★★★★5/5
Care One at Weymouth1.6 miWeymouth, MA★★☆☆☆2/5
Southwood at Norwell Nursing Ctr2.5 miNorwell, MA★★★★★5/5
Dwyer Home2.8 miWeymouth, MA★★★★★5/5
Royal Norwell Nursing & Rehabilitation Center LLC3.2 miNorwell, MA★★★☆☆3/5
Pope Nursing Home3.3 miWeymouth, MA★★☆☆☆2/5
Royal Braintree Nursing and Rehabilitation Center3.6 miBraintree, MA★★☆☆☆2/5
Alliance Health at Braintree4.0 miBraintree, MA★★★★★5/5
Webster Park Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center4.1 miRockland, MA★★★★★4/5
Southshore Health Care Center4.1 miRockland, MA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Harbor House Nursing & Rehabilitation Center4.2 miHingham, MA★★★★☆4/5
John Scott House Nursing & Rehabilitation Center4.4 miBraintree, MA★★★★★4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

Other facilities in the same county

CMS records place this facility in Plymouth, MA — 27 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.

Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.

All facilities in Hingham →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 225773.

Your research

Viewed & saved homes

Kept in this browser tab for this session. Choose to remember them only on a device you trust. Opening a record or comparison sends its usual page request.

Selected for comparison

Recently viewed

Prices entered in a cost worksheet stay on that page and are not saved. Privacy details