New JerseyPompton Plains

Cedar Crest/Mountainview Gardens

4 Cedar Crest Village Drive, Pompton Plains, NJ 07444 · Morris County · 113 certified beds · avg 109 residents/day · certified since Apr 15, 2005

Abuse citation flag (CMS)

Part of chain: ERICKSON SENIOR LIVING (17 facilities, chain avg rating 4.2★)

The abuse flag means inspectors cited this facility for abuse that caused harm to a resident within the past year, or potential for harm in each of the last two years. Source: CMS.

2/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
3
Serious findings on record
$49,960
Fines, last 3 years
4.55
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Sep 23, 2025 · F-0600 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors.

Why it matters: Abuse and neglect cause direct physical and emotional harm and are among the most serious failures a nursing home can have.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: Oct 21, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jan 7, 2026 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jan 23, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jul 25, 2024 · F-0726 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.

Why it matters: Undertrained caregivers are more likely to miss warning signs and make care mistakes.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jul 26, 2024 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (14)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jan 29, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Jan 29, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 7, 2026▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Sep 23, 2025▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Mar 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · from a complaint
Mar 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Sep 13, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Sep 13, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Sep 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Sep 13, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jul 25, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint
May 25, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal.
May 25, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition.
May 25, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 2).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202330D
202451G ▲
202531J ▲
202631G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

3 fines totaling $49,960.

DateTypeAmount / length
Jan 7, 2026Fine$9,110
Sep 23, 2025Fine$32,338
Jul 25, 2024Fine$8,512

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityNew Jersey avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.553.883.95top 16% in New Jersey; top 22% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.920.670.69top 16% in New Jersey; top 20% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.083.533.50top 17% in New Jersey; top 21% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.420.500.48top 46% in New Jersey; top 44% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)21.239.745.8top 8% in New Jersey; top 4% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)19.037.742.9top 14% in New Jersey; top 13% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.18, RN 0.84, weekend 3.74. Staffing rating: 5/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
National Senior Communities, INCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%01/14/2021
Bison, MichaelIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/08/2025
Brown, IanIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2023
Brown, PatriciaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2022
Butler, RichardIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2014
Clupper, KatherineIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2024
Colins, MaryIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2010
Colins, MaryIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2019
Embley, MarkIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/27/2021
Embley, MarkIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE10/27/2021
Embley, MarkIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE10/27/2021
Erickson Senior Living LLCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/23/2020
Erickson Senior Living LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/11/2025
Erstad, EileenIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2018
Erstad, EileenIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2018
Goodman, JamesIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE03/26/2026
Hall, JohnIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE04/30/2010
Hall, JohnIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE04/30/2010
Hall, JohnIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/30/2010
Jacque, ZinaIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE04/01/2018

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Health Center at Bloomingdale2.2 miBloomingdale, NJ★★★★★4/5
Phoenix Center for Rehabilitation and Pediatrics2.8 miHaskell, NJ★★★☆☆3/5
Complete Care at Wayne Hills Rehab & Resp Center2.9 miWayne, NJ★☆☆☆☆1/5
Llanfair House Care & Rehabilitation Center3.0 miWayne, NJ★★☆☆☆2/5
Arbor Ridge Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center3.0 miWayne, NJ★★☆☆☆1/5
Lakeland Nursing & Rehab3.6 miHaskell, NJ★★★★☆3/5
Careone at Wayne3.7 miWayne, NJ★★★★★5/5
Avalon Rehab and Care Center3.8 miWayne, NJ★★★☆☆4/5
Oakland Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center4.5 miOakland, NJ★★★☆☆2/5
Lincoln Park Renaissance4.9 miLincoln Park, NJ★★★★☆3/5
Lincoln Park Care Center4.9 miLincoln Park, NJ★☆☆☆☆1/5
Atrium Post Acute Care of Wayne5.3 miWayne, NJ★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Pompton Plains →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315491.