MassachusettsDanvers

Hunt Nursing & Rehab Center

90 Lindall Street, Danvers, MA 01923 · Essex County · 120 certified beds · avg 109 residents/day · certified since Apr 1, 1998

Part of chain: INTEGRITUS HEALTHCARE (14 facilities, chain avg rating 2.8★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
2
Serious findings on record
$10,517
Fines, last 3 years
3.91
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Apr 16, 2024 · F-0656 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.

Why it matters: Without a complete, working care plan, important needs can slip through the cracks and no one is accountable for results.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Mar 20, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Apr 16, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Mar 20, 2024 (Past Non-Compliance)

All citations in the current public record (21)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Feb 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Feb 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids.
Feb 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Feb 6, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Feb 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Feb 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Feb 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have.
Feb 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections.
Nov 20, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Apr 16, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Apr 16, 2024▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Feb 6, 2024F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
Feb 6, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Feb 6, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Feb 6, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Feb 6, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Feb 6, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Feb 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Feb 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle.
Feb 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Feb 6, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide care that took into account residents' past trauma or their cultural backgrounds. Care is supposed to be sensitive to what residents have lived through and where they come from.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 3).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2024132G ▲
202550E
202630D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $10,517.

DateTypeAmount / length
Apr 16, 2024Fine$10,517

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMassachusetts avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.913.893.95top 37% in Massachusetts; top 43% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.790.650.69top 19% in Massachusetts; top 28% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.503.513.50top 40% in Massachusetts; top 42% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.520.460.48top 27% in Massachusetts; top 31% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)41.238.245.8bottom 37% in Massachusetts; top 40% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)36.842.642.9top 40% in Massachusetts; top 41% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.82, RN 0.77, weekend 3.42. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 3/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 2/5

Who owns this facility

Non profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Fairview Extended Care Services INCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest100%03/26/1990
Integritus Healthcare INCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest03/26/1990
Integritus Healthcare Management Services INCOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest02/01/2022
Fairview Extended Care Services INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2022
Fairview Extended Care Services INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/25/2025
Gingras, Marcie JoIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE12/13/2021
Gingras, Marcie JoIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE12/31/2021
Gingras, Marcie JoIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2022
Integritus Healthcare INCOrganization5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2022
Integritus Healthcare Management Services INCOrganizationOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2022
Integritus Healthcare Management Services INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/25/2025
Jones, WilliamIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2022
Jones, WilliamIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE02/01/1993
Jones, WilliamIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2022
Jones, WilliamIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2022
Poudel, SantoshIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2022
Poudel, SantoshIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2022
Spittle, SharonIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2022
Spittle, SharonIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/01/2022

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Twin Oaks Center0.4 miDanvers, MA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Brentwood Rehabilitation and Healthcare Ctr (the)1.4 miDanvers, MA★★★★☆4/5
Hathorne Hill Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center1.5 miDanvers, MA★★★★☆4/5
Care One at Peabody1.9 miPeabody, MA★★★★★5/5
Continuing Care at Brooksby Village2.1 miPeabody, MA★★★★☆3/5
New England Homes for the Deaf, INC2.4 miDanvers, MA★★★★☆3/5
Alliance Health at Rosewood3.1 miPeabody, MA★★★☆☆3/5
Pilgrim Rehabilitation & Skilled Nursing Center3.2 miPeabody, MA★★★★☆4/5
Ledgewood Rehabilitation and Nursing Center3.5 miBeverly, MA★★★★☆4/5
Blueberry Hill Rehabilitation and Healthcare Ctr3.7 miBeverly, MA★☆☆☆☆1/5
Masconomet Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center4.0 miTopsfield, MA★★★☆☆3/5
Care One at Essex Park4.3 miBeverly, MA★★★★☆4/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Danvers →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 225740.