How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
875 Route 202-206 North, Bridgewater, NJ 08807 (opens Google Maps) · Somerset County · (908) 526-8600· 176 certified beds · avg 157 residents/day · certified since Feb 20, 1972 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: COMPLETE CARE (85 facilities, chain avg rating 3.1★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 19 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. F-0814
The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. F-0558
The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. F-0657
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2026 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · F-0814 |
| Feb 11, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups. · F-0558 |
| Feb 11, 2026 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Feb 11, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents' personal and medical information private and confidential. · F-0583 |
| Feb 11, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Feb 11, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640 |
| Feb 11, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Feb 11, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
| Feb 11, 2026 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Sep 26, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · F-0585 |
| Sep 26, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not give the resident or their representative written notice of how long it would hold the resident's bed during a hospital stay or approved leave. · F-0625 |
| Sep 26, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature. · F-0804 |
| Sep 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Sep 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used bed rails without first trying safer alternatives, or without assessing the resident's safety risk, discussing the risks and benefits with the resident or family, getting consent, and installing the rails correctly. · F-0700 |
| Sep 26, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Sep 29, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not update each resident's care assessment at least once every 3 months. These regular check-ins keep the resident's care plan matched to their current condition. · F-0638 |
| Sep 29, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · F-0644 |
| Sep 29, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645 |
| Sep 29, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 9).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 4 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 6 | 0 | E |
| 2026 | 9 | 0 | F |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New Jersey avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.06 | 3.88 | 3.95 | bottom 7% in New Jersey; bottom 16% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.32 | 0.67 | 0.69 | bottom 9% in New Jersey; bottom 12% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.97 | 3.53 | 3.50 | bottom 22% in New Jersey; bottom 29% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.19 | 0.50 | 0.48 | bottom 10% in New Jersey; bottom 10% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 41.9 | 39.7 | 45.8 | bottom 42% in New Jersey; top 41% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 42.9 | 37.7 | 42.9 | bottom 37% in New Jersey; bottom 49% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.10, RN 0.33, weekend 3.01.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.10 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Complete Care at Green Knoll. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eef Capital LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 45% | 02/01/2019 |
| Schlaff, Benny | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 23% | 02/01/2019 |
| Schlaff, Nachum | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 23% | 02/01/2019 |
| Weissman, Malka | Individual | Indirect Ownership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2019 |
| Eef Capital LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2019 |
| Green Knoll Care Reality LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2019 |
| Grewal, Baljinder | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/06/2020 |
| Grewal, Baljinder | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/06/2020 |
| Jurczynski, Susan | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/10/2023 |
| Levovitz, Yitzchok | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2019 |
| Levovitz, Yitzchok | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2019 |
| Libatique, Rikka | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/06/2025 |
| Libatique, Rikka | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/06/2025 |
| Mercado, Wanda | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/19/2022 |
| Mercado, Wanda | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/19/2022 |
| Mur, Ahmad | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2019 |
| Mur, Ahmad | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/10/2019 |
| Peace Capital LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2019 |
| Schlaff, Benny | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2019 |
| Schlaff, Nachum | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2019 |
Showing 20 of 23 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 3 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Complete Care — 85 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 84 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Waterfront Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 1.3 mi | Raritan, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Bridgeway Care and Rehab Center at Bridgewater | 1.3 mi | Bridgewater, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| The Arbor at Laurel Circle | 1.9 mi | Bridgewater, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| N J Eastern Star Home | 2.9 mi | Bridgewater, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Skilled Nursing at Fellowship Village | 4.7 mi | Basking Ridge, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Careone at Somerset Valley | 5.6 mi | Bound Brook, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Somerset Woods Rehabilitation & Nursing Center | 6.2 mi | Somerset, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Bridgeway Care and Rehab Center at Hillsborough | 6.4 mi | Hillsborough, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Foothill Acres Rehabilitation & Nursing Center | 7.4 mi | Hillsborough, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Parker at Somerset, INC | 8.0 mi | Somerset, NJ | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Abingdon Care & Rehabilitation Center | 8.3 mi | Green Brook, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Regency Heritage Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 8.3 mi | Somerset, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Somerset, NJ — 15 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315134.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details