How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Cedar Grove Respiratory and Nursing Center
1420 South Black Horse Pike, Williamstown, NJ 08094 (opens Google Maps) · Gloucester County · (856) 875-0100· 180 certified beds · avg 178 residents/day · certified since Feb 9, 1988 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: ATLAS HEALTHCARE (29 facilities, chain avg rating 3.6★)
4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected May 20, 2025
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
2.90
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 32 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint F-0584
The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. F-0693
The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. F-0759
View all 32 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584 |
| May 20, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693 |
| May 20, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| May 20, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| May 20, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| May 20, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · F-0919 |
| Dec 8, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| May 18, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| May 18, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| May 18, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| May 18, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| May 18, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · F-0760 |
| May 18, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| May 18, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician. · F-0803 |
| May 18, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · F-0919 |
| Feb 23, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Feb 23, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not make sure its staff were vaccinated for COVID-19 in accordance with the federal requirements in effect at the time. · F-0888 |
| Feb 23, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645 |
| Feb 23, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Feb 23, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Feb 23, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Feb 23, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Feb 23, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693 |
| Feb 23, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Feb 23, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697 |
| Feb 23, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe, appropriate care for residents who need dialysis — the treatment that filters the blood when kidneys fail. · F-0698 |
| Feb 23, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not observe each nurse aide's job performance or provide regular training as required. · F-0730 |
| Feb 23, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's complete medication regimen and medical chart every month, or did not follow its own rules for reporting medication problems. · F-0756 |
| Feb 23, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Feb 23, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have a working program to monitor how antibiotics are used. Tracking antibiotic use helps make sure these drugs are given only when needed and remain effective. · F-0881 |
| Feb 23, 2022 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not give residents proper notice about what Medicare or Medicaid covers, or about charges the resident might owe for services that aren't covered. · F-0582 |
| Feb 23, 2022 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way. · F-0637 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections stayed about the same across the last two inspection cycles (8 → 6).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2022
All citations: 17
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2023
All citations: 9
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 17 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 9 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 6 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityNew Jersey averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 2.90
New Jersey average: 3.88
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.42
New Jersey average: 0.67
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.69
New Jersey average: 3.53
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New Jersey avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.90 | 3.88 | 3.95 | bottom 3% in New Jersey; bottom 11% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.42 | 0.67 | 0.69 | bottom 26% in New Jersey; bottom 26% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.69 | 3.53 | 3.50 | bottom 6% in New Jersey; bottom 16% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.40 | 0.50 | 0.48 | top 49% in New Jersey; top 48% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 49.4 | 39.7 | 45.8 | bottom 25% in New Jersey; bottom 38% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 31.6 | 37.7 | 42.9 | top 40% in New Jersey; top 32% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.94, RN 0.57, weekend 3.65.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.94 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 1/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Cedar Grove Respiratory and Nursing Center. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bak, Pinchos | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 34% | 02/01/2020 |
| Gardenview Opco Holding LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 02/01/2020 |
| Goldberger, Shlomo | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 33% | 02/01/2020 |
| Sonnenschein, Moshe | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 33% | 02/01/2020 |
| Bak, Pinchos | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2020 |
| Bak, Pinchos | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2020 |
| Bak, Pinchos | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2020 |
| Cedar Grove Propco LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2020 |
| Conti, Joseph | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2020 |
| Conti, Joseph | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2020 |
| Gardenview Manager LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2020 |
| Gardenview Manager LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/14/2025 |
| Goldberger, Shlomo | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2020 |
| Goldberger, Shlomo | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2020 |
| Isaac, Chaim | Individual | Trustee of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2020 |
| Malt Family Trust | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2020 |
| Meadow Heights Realty LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/14/2025 |
| Seeve, Eliezer | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2020 |
| Seeve, Eliezer | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2020 |
| SGS 2010 Family Trust | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/01/2020 |
Showing 20 of 26 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 6 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain Atlas Healthcare — 29 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Meadowbrook Respiratory and Nursing Center — Matawan, NJ · overall 4/5
- Mystic Meadows Rehabilitation and Nursing Center — Little Egg Harbor TW, NJ · overall 4/5
- The Elms Rehab and Healthcare Center of Cranbury — Cranbury, NJ · overall 2/5
- Waterfront Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Raritan, NJ · overall 5/5
- Wynwood Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Cinnaminson, NJ · overall 2/5
- Bride Brook Rehabilitation & Nursing Center — Niantic, CT · overall 5/5
- Manchester Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center — Manchester, CT · overall 5/5
- Pendleton Rehabilitation and Nursing Center — Mystic, CT · overall 5/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 28 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
- "How do you decide when a feeding tube is truly needed, and how do staff care for residents who have one?"
- "What is your current medication error rate, and what have you changed to bring errors down?"
- "Can you show me how medications are stored and secured on the units, including controlled drugs?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "Can you show me the call buttons in the bathrooms and bathing areas, and tell me your average response time when one is pressed?"
- "Tell me about this abuse or neglect citation — what happened, and what specific changes did you make afterward?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the New Jersey midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 49% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 26 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 41 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atlas Rehabilitation and Healthcare at Washington | 5.3 mi | Sewell, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Berlin Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 6.7 mi | Berlin, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| The Center for Rehab & Nursing Washington Township | 6.9 mi | Sewell, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Fountains of Atco | 7.5 mi | Atco, NJ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | SFF |
| Hammonton Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare | 9.8 mi | Hammonton, NJ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| United Methodist Communities at Pitman | 9.9 mi | Pitman, NJ | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Elmwood Hills Healthcare Center LLC | 10.1 mi | Blackwood, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Laurel Manor Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center | 11.0 mi | Stratford, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 4/5 | |
| Advanced Subacute Rehabilitation Center at Sewell | 11.6 mi | Sewell, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Autumn Lake Healthcare at Voorhees | 12.0 mi | Voorhees, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| New Jersey Veterans Memorial Vineland | 12.2 mi | Vineland, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Lions Gate | 12.3 mi | Voorhees, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Gloucester, NJ — 9 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Deptford Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare — Deptford, NJ · overall 2/5
- Shady Lane Gloucester Co Home — Clarksboro, NJ · overall 5/5
- Atlas Post Acute at Woodbury Country Club — Woodbury, NJ · overall 2/5
- Atlas Rehabilitation & Healthcare at West Deptfor — West Deptford, NJ · overall 5/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315257.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).