61 Maplewood Avenue, Cranbury, NJ 08512 (opens Google Maps) · Middlesex County · (609) 395-0641· 120 certified beds · avg 102 residents/day · certified since May 20, 1998 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: ATLAS HEALTHCARE (29 facilities, chain avg rating 3.6★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Feb 12, 2026 · F-0604 · triggered by a complaint
The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment.
Why it matters: Unneeded restraints can cause injuries, muscle loss, and deep emotional distress.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Feb 19, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Dec 20, 2024 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint
The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jan 22, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
▲ Immediate jeopardy, isolated · Dec 20, 2024 · F-0835 · triggered by a complaint
The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents.
Why it matters: Poor administration often shows up as understaffing, supply shortages, and care problems across the whole facility.
Severity (J): Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety was cited. The scope was isolated: limited residents, staff, or locations were affected. Scope describes the extent of the deficiency, not whether it happened on previous inspections.
Corrected: Jan 22, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)
Showing the latest 3 of 11 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · from a complaint F-0604
The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. F-0677
The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. F-0842
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 2026 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility used physical restraints — devices that limit a resident's movement — when they weren't needed for medical treatment. · from a complaint · F-0604 |
| Nov 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Nov 19, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Dec 20, 2024 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint · F-0689 |
| Dec 20, 2024 | ▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, isolated | The facility was not managed in a way that uses its money, staff, and resources effectively and efficiently to care for residents. · from a complaint · F-0835 |
| Mar 7, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint · F-0609 |
| Mar 7, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
| Mar 7, 2024 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not enter each resident's assessment information into the required format and send it to the state within 7 days of completing the assessment, as the rules require. · F-0640 |
| Nov 19, 2021 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Nov 19, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Nov 19, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 2).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 3 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 5 | 2 | J ▲ |
| 2025 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 2026 | 1 | 1 | J ▲ |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
1 fine totaling $57,282.
Every penalty CMS publishes for this facility in the 3-year window is listed —none excluded. The count and the dollar total come from two different CMS datasets and agree for this facility. Penalties older than the window are dropped by CMS before publication, not by us.
| Date | Type | Amount / length |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2024 | Fine | $57,282 |
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New Jersey avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.49 | 3.88 | 3.95 | bottom 39% in New Jersey; bottom 36% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.54 | 0.67 | 0.69 | bottom 47% in New Jersey; bottom 44% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.25 | 3.53 | 3.50 | bottom 46% in New Jersey; bottom 44% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.55 | 0.50 | 0.48 | top 28% in New Jersey; top 28% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 62.5 | 39.7 | 45.8 | bottom 4% in New Jersey; bottom 13% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 100.0 | 37.7 | 42.9 | bottom 1% in New Jersey; bottom 1% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.82, RN 0.59, weekend 3.55.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.82 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for The Elms Rehab and Healthcare Center of Cranbury. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cranbury SNF Operations Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 09/01/2022 |
| Herzka, David | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 15% | 09/01/2022 |
| Malt Family Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 28% | 09/01/2022 |
| SGS 2010 Family Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 28% | 09/01/2022 |
| Tyh 2017 Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 28% | 09/01/2022 |
| Bak, Pinchos | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2022 |
| Bak, Pinchos | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2021 |
| Bak, Pinchos | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2021 |
| Cranbury SNF Holdco LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2022 |
| Cranbury SNF Operations Management LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2022 |
| Cranbury SNF Realty LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/09/2025 |
| Fiorillo, Jackie | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2021 |
| Gerson, Yosef | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2021 |
| Gerson, Yosef | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2021 |
| Goldberger, Shlomo | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2021 |
| Goldberger, Shlomo | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2021 |
| Herzka, David | Individual | Limited Partnership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2021 |
| Malt Family Trust | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2022 |
| MPS Cranbury Realty Holdings LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2022 |
| Nasra, Magdy | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/01/2021 |
Showing 20 of 26 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 6 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Atlas Healthcare — 29 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 28 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cranbury Center | 2.0 mi | Monroe Township, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Gardens at Monroe Healthcare and Rehabilitation, T | 2.8 mi | Monroe Township, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Meadow Lakes | 4.0 mi | East Windsor, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Village Point | 4.4 mi | Monroe Township, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Complete Care at Park Place LLC | 5.7 mi | Monmouth Junction, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Merwick Care & Rehabilitation Center, LLC | 6.1 mi | Plainsboro, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Carnegie Post Acute Care at Princeton LLC | 6.3 mi | Princeton, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Careone at East Brunswick | 8.0 mi | East Brunswick, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Excel Care at Manalapan | 8.5 mi | Manalapan, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Avalon Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 9.0 mi | Hamilton, NJ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Stonebridge at Montgomery Health Care Center | 9.6 mi | Skillman, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Preferred Care at Hamilton | 10.1 mi | Hamilton Square, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Middlesex, NJ — 25 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315451.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details