How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Catalina Post Acute and Rehabilitation
2611 North Warren Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85719 (opens Google Maps) · Pima County · (520) 795-9574· 102 certified beds · avg 97 residents/day · certified since Oct 20, 1988 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: THE ENSIGN GROUP (342 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)
3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Sep 16, 2025
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.29
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 21 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint F-0641
The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. F-0812
The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. F-0658
View all 21 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives. · from a complaint · F-0641 |
| Sep 16, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Sep 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · F-0658 |
| Sep 16, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Jun 23, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint · F-0726 |
| Aug 8, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. · from a complaint · F-0676 |
| Jul 9, 2024 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · from a complaint · F-0584 |
| Dec 27, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide basic life support, such as CPR, before emergency medical help arrived — care that's required when it matches the doctor's orders and the resident's own written wishes. · from a complaint · F-0678 |
| Jul 7, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Jul 7, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not dispose of garbage and refuse properly. · F-0814 |
| Jul 7, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. · F-0580 |
| Jul 7, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Jul 7, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility used feeding tubes without a valid medical reason or the resident's agreement, or did not provide proper care to residents who have feeding tubes. · F-0693 |
| Jul 7, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Jul 7, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Jul 21, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason. · F-0757 |
| Jul 21, 2022 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jul 21, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · F-0684 |
| Jul 21, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · F-0686 |
| Jul 21, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Jul 21, 2022 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · F-0689 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (7 → 3).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2022
All citations: 6
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2023
All citations: 8
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2024
All citations: 2
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 5
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 6 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 8 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 2 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 5 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityArizona averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.29
Arizona average: 3.97
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.76
Arizona average: 0.69
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 2.94
Arizona average: 3.50
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Arizona avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.29 | 3.97 | 3.95 | bottom 23% in Arizona; bottom 26% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.76 | 0.69 | 0.69 | top 30% in Arizona; top 31% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.94 | 3.50 | 3.50 | bottom 26% in Arizona; bottom 28% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.81 | 0.49 | 0.48 | top 13% in Arizona; top 11% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 41.7 | 45.2 | 45.8 | top 34% in Arizona; top 41% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 31.3 | 43.6 | 42.9 | top 24% in Arizona; top 32% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.98, RN 0.92, weekend 3.56.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.98 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Catalina Post Acute and Rehabilitation. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caretrust Reit INC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 100% | 01/01/2022 |
| Burnam, Soon | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2006 |
| Burnam, Soon | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/01/2006 |
| Caretrust GP LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/16/2003 |
| Caretrust Reit INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| Concentric Healthcare Solutions LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/16/2003 |
| Concentric Healthcare Solutions LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/24/2025 |
| Ctr Partnership LP | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
| Eagar, Robert | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/10/2009 |
| Eagar, Robert | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/10/2009 |
| Eagar, Robert | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/10/2009 |
| Ensign Services INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/16/2013 |
| Favorite Healthcare Staffing LLC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/16/2003 |
| Favorite Healthcare Staffing LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/16/2003 |
| Keetch, Chad | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 03/01/2011 |
| P20 Parent INC | Organization | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/16/2003 |
| P20 Parent INC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/24/2025 |
| Peterson, Forrest | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2019 |
| Port, Barry | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/26/2018 |
| Rillito Holdings LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 01/01/2022 |
Showing 20 of 25 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 5 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain The Ensign Group — 342 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Chandler Post Acute and Rehabilitation — Chandler, AZ · overall 4/5
- Citadel Post Acute — Mesa, AZ · overall 5/5
- Citrus Heights Respiratory and Rehabilitation — Mesa, AZ · overall 3/5
- Coronado Healthcare Center — Phoenix, AZ · overall 5/5
- Desert Blossom Health & Rehab Center — Mesa, AZ · overall 5/5
- Desert Terrace Healthcare Center — Phoenix, AZ · overall 3/5abuse
- Estrella Health and Rehabilitation Center — Avondale, AZ · overall 4/5
- Fountain Hills Post Acute — Fountain Hills, AZ · overall 3/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 341 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "Who completes resident assessments here, and how do you check them for accuracy?"
- "What did your most recent kitchen inspection find, and can I see how food is stored and prepared?"
- "Can you tell me what this citation involved and what steps you took to bring care back up to standard?"
- "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
- "How do you verify that your nurses and aides have the skills to care for residents with needs like my family member's?"
- "How do you help residents maintain their daily living skills, and how do you measure whether it's working?"
- "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
- "Are staff on every shift trained and certified in CPR, and how do they know each resident's resuscitation wishes?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Arizona midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 42% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 25 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 21 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Park Avenue Health and Rehabilitation Center | 0.8 mi | Tucson, AZ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Villa Maria Post Acute and Rehabilitation | 2.9 mi | Tucson, AZ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| The Center at Tucson | 3.5 mi | Tucson, AZ | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Santa Rosa Care Center | 3.6 mi | Tucson, AZ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Haven of Tucson | 3.7 mi | Tucson, AZ | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Handmaker Home for the Aging | 4.1 mi | Tucson, AZ | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Foothills Rehabilitation Center | 4.1 mi | Tucson, AZ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Sabino Canyon Rehabilitation & Care Center | 4.7 mi | Tucson, AZ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Pueblo Springs Rehabilitation Center | 4.8 mi | Tucson, AZ | ★★☆☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Devon Gables Rehabilitation Center | 5.3 mi | Tucson, AZ | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Sandstone Estates Rehab Centre | 5.3 mi | Tucson, AZ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Arizona State Veteran Home-Tucson | 5.3 mi | Tucson, AZ | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Pima, AZ — 24 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Haven Health Green Valley, LLC — Green Valley, AZ · overall 5/5
- Haven of Saguaro Valley — Tucson, AZ · overall 5/5
- La Canada Care Center — Tucson, AZ · overall 2/5
- Life Care Center of Tucson — Tucson, AZ · overall 1/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 035190.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).