ArizonaMesa

Desert Blossom Health & Rehab Center

60 South 58th Street, Mesa, AZ 85206 · Maricopa County · 106 certified beds · avg 95 residents/day · certified since Aug 4, 1988

Part of chain: THE ENSIGN GROUP (342 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)

4/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$8,278
Fines, last 3 years
3.23
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jun 2, 2025 · F-0684 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.

Why it matters: Care that strays from doctor's orders or ignores the resident's wishes can lead to declining health and avoidable harm.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Jun 22, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has plan of correction)

All citations in the current public record (12)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Dec 16, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jul 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Jul 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Jul 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · from a complaint
Jul 18, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Jun 2, 2025▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
May 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
May 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
May 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration. · from a complaint
May 9, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Jan 6, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Jan 6, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 1).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202320D
202440D
202561G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $8,278.

DateTypeAmount / length
Jun 2, 2025Fine$8,278

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityArizona avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.233.973.95bottom 21% in Arizona; bottom 23% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.630.690.69top 41% in Arizona; top 44% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.783.503.50bottom 15% in Arizona; bottom 20% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.440.490.48top 45% in Arizona; top 41% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)51.645.245.8bottom 27% in Arizona; bottom 33% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)43.843.642.9bottom 50% in Arizona; bottom 46% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.45, RN 0.68, weekend 2.98. Staffing rating: 2/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Burnam, SoonIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/13/2017
Ensign Services INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2017
Keetch, ChadIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2014
Peterson, ForrestIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/13/2018
Petty, ScottIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2017
Petty, ScottIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2017
Petty, ScottIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2017
Port, BarryIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/11/2025
Qamar, WaqasIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE05/08/2022
Qamar, WaqasIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/08/2022
Qamar, WaqasIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/08/2022
Standard Bearer Healthcare Op, LPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
The Ensign Group INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Velda Rose Health Holdings LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Advanced Healthcare of Mesa0.1 miMesa, AZ★★★★★5/5
Alta Mesa Health and Rehabilitation0.6 miMesa, AZ★★★★★5/5
Mi Casa Nursing Center0.6 miMesa, AZ★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Citadel Post Acute0.7 miMesa, AZ★★★★★5/5
Montecito Post Acute Care and Rehabilitation1.1 miMesa, AZ★★★★☆3/5
Mission Palms Post Acute1.2 miMesa, AZ★★★★☆3/5
Springdale Village Post Acute2.4 miMesa, AZ★★★☆☆2/5
Sante of Mesa2.5 miMesa, AZ★★★★★5/5
Citrus Heights Respiratory and Rehabilitation2.9 miMesa, AZ★★★☆☆2/5
Sandridge Post Acute7.6 miMesa, AZ★★★☆☆2/5
Apache Junction Health Center8.2 miApache Junction, AZ★★★★☆3/5
Wellsprings of Gilbert8.8 miGilbert, AZ★★★★★5/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Mesa →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 035164.