ArizonaTucson

Pueblo Springs Rehabilitation Center

5545 East Lee Street, Tucson, AZ 85712 · Pima County · 129 certified beds · avg 93 residents/day · certified since Jan 16, 1981

Part of chain: THE ENSIGN GROUP (342 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.40
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (21)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 12, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · from a complaint
Jun 6, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jun 6, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Jun 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · from a complaint
Jun 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Jun 6, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Jun 6, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Jun 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection. · from a complaint
Dec 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Dec 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Apr 25, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Apr 25, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Apr 25, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Mar 24, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Mar 24, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Mar 24, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Mar 24, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Mar 24, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Mar 24, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Mar 24, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Mar 24, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (3 → 4).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202280E
202350E
202570E
202610D

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityArizona avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.403.973.95bottom 30% in Arizona; bottom 31% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.240.690.69bottom 2% in Arizona; bottom 4% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing2.963.503.50bottom 27% in Arizona; bottom 29% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.140.490.48bottom 1% in Arizona; bottom 4% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)58.345.245.8bottom 16% in Arizona; bottom 19% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)75.043.642.9bottom 7% in Arizona; bottom 9% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.03, RN 0.21, weekend 2.64. Staffing rating: 1/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Limited Liability company

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Singh, JaspreetIndividualIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE08/20/2023
The Ensign Group INCOrganizationIndirect Ownership InterestNOT APPLICABLE06/13/2017
Barnes, JacobIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/09/2026
Barnes, JacobIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/09/2026
Barnes, JacobIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/09/2026
Burnam, SoonIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE06/13/2017
Burnam, SoonIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/23/2017
Ensign Services INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/13/2017
Harlan Heights Health Holdings LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Keetch, ChadIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2011
Peterson, ForrestIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
Port, BarryIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE07/26/2018
Singh, JaspreetIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE08/20/2023
Singh, JaspreetIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/25/2025
Standard Bearer Healthcare Op, LPOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2022
The Ensign Group INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE09/01/2017

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Sabino Canyon Rehabilitation & Care Center0.1 miTucson, AZ★★★★☆3/5
Handmaker Home for the Aging0.7 miTucson, AZ★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Sandstone Estates Rehab Centre0.7 miTucson, AZ★☆☆☆☆1/5
Foothills Rehabilitation Center0.8 miTucson, AZ★★☆☆☆1/5
Devon Gables Rehabilitation Center0.9 miTucson, AZ★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Santa Rosa Care Center1.2 miTucson, AZ★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Haven of Saguaro Valley1.6 miTucson, AZ★★★★★4/5
The Center at Tucson1.6 miTucson, AZ★★★★★5/5
Villa Maria Post Acute and Rehabilitation1.9 miTucson, AZ★★★☆☆2/5
Haven of Tucson2.5 miTucson, AZ★★☆☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Tucson →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 035068.