ArizonaTucson

Sandstone Estates Rehab Centre

2040 North Wilmot Road, Tucson, AZ 85712 · Pima County · 103 certified beds · avg 61 residents/day · certified since Feb 21, 2017

Part of chain: SANDSTONE HEALTHCARE GROUP (3 facilities, chain avg rating 1.7★)

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
4.69
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 1/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (30)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly. · from a complaint
Jun 5, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper foot care for residents. Foot care includes routine care like nail trimming and attention to foot problems, which matter greatly for older adults. · from a complaint
Mar 20, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing.
Mar 20, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Mar 20, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Mar 20, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide appropriate treatment and services to residents with a mental health condition, difficulty adjusting emotionally, or a history of trauma or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
Mar 20, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide or arrange specialized rehabilitation services — such as physical, occupational, or speech therapy — for residents who needed them.
May 9, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Oct 25, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft. These written safeguards are the foundation of resident protection.
Oct 25, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation.
Oct 25, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do.
Oct 25, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Oct 25, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time.
Oct 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from misuse of their belongings or money — this is called misappropriation, and it includes theft or improper use of a resident's property or funds. · from a complaint
Oct 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own.
Oct 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist.
Oct 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents' medications free from unnecessary drugs. Residents should only take medicines they truly need, at the right dose, for a clear reason.
Oct 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication.
Oct 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Oct 25, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Jan 26, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not reassess a resident after a significant change in their condition, such as a sudden decline in health. A full new assessment is required when a resident's condition changes in a major way.
Jan 26, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Jan 26, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Jan 26, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Jan 26, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Jan 26, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Jan 26, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a registered nurse on duty at least 8 hours a day, or did not have a registered nurse serving full-time as director of nursing.
Jan 26, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jan 26, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Jan 26, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (12 → 5).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
2023100E
2024120E
202510D
202670F

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityArizona avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.693.973.95top 18% in Arizona; top 19% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.400.690.69bottom 15% in Arizona; bottom 23% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing4.223.503.50top 18% in Arizona; top 17% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.350.490.48bottom 36% in Arizona; bottom 43% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)48.645.245.8bottom 38% in Arizona; bottom 40% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)42.943.642.9top 47% in Arizona; bottom 49% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 4.26, RN 0.37, weekend 3.83. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Nicho Family TrustOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest13%07/01/2022
Sunny TrustOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest13%07/01/2022
Whitte TrustOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest13%07/01/2022
Bejar, NissimIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2022
Bejar, NissimIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2022
Bejar, NissimIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2022
Berkowitz, DavidIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/09/2025
Cohen, ElliotIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2022
Cohen, ElliotIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2022
Cohen, ElliotIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2022
Cohen, MichaelIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2022
Cohen, MichaelIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2022
Cohen, MichaelIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2022
Curis Services LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2022
Hunt, StevenIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2022
Hunt, StevenIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2022
Meystel, MeirIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2022
Meystel, MeirIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2022
Meystel, MeirIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/01/2022
Meystel, YosefIndividualIndividual Is an Owner, Partner or Trustee of Any ADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE04/09/2025

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Devon Gables Rehabilitation Center0.2 miTucson, AZ★★☆☆☆2/5abuse
Sabino Canyon Rehabilitation & Care Center0.7 miTucson, AZ★★★★☆3/5
Pueblo Springs Rehabilitation Center0.7 miTucson, AZ★★☆☆☆3/5
Handmaker Home for the Aging1.2 miTucson, AZ★★★☆☆2/5abuse
Foothills Rehabilitation Center1.2 miTucson, AZ★★☆☆☆1/5
Haven of Saguaro Valley1.7 miTucson, AZ★★★★★4/5
Santa Rosa Care Center1.8 miTucson, AZ★★★☆☆2/5abuse
The Center at Tucson1.9 miTucson, AZ★★★★★5/5
Villa Maria Post Acute and Rehabilitation2.3 miTucson, AZ★★★☆☆2/5
Haven of Tucson2.5 miTucson, AZ★★☆☆☆2/5
Catalina Post Acute and Rehabilitation5.3 miTucson, AZ★★★★☆3/5
Park Avenue Health and Rehabilitation Center5.8 miTucson, AZ★★★★☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Tucson →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 035292.