ArizonaChandler

Chandler Post Acute and Rehabilitation

2121 West Elgin Street, Chandler, AZ 85224 · Maricopa County · 120 certified beds · avg 106 residents/day · certified since Jan 24, 1985

Part of chain: THE ENSIGN GROUP (342 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.83
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5

⚠ The most recent standard health inspection was more than 2 years ago — conditions may have changed.

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

All citations in the current public record (21)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Dec 12, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area. · from a complaint
Dec 12, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Nov 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Nov 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Nov 20, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Nov 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Nov 17, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Nov 1, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint
Apr 2, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Dec 7, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint
Oct 17, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · from a complaint
Oct 20, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Oct 20, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.
Oct 20, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away.
Oct 20, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Oct 20, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Oct 20, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide enough food and fluids to keep residents healthy, such as preventing unplanned weight loss or dehydration.
Jun 17, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Jun 17, 2021E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Jun 17, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Jun 17, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.

Inspection trend by year

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202140E
202260D
202320D
202420D
202570E

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityArizona avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.833.973.95top 41% in Arizona; top 47% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.810.690.69top 27% in Arizona; top 27% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.183.503.50bottom 44% in Arizona; bottom 41% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.460.490.48top 40% in Arizona; top 37% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)43.745.245.8top 42% in Arizona; top 46% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)47.643.642.9bottom 40% in Arizona; bottom 40% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.75, RN 0.79, weekend 3.11. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Burnam, SoonIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE12/15/2014
Ensign Services INCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2015
Jones, BrettIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2015
Jones, BrettIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2015
Jones, BrettIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE06/22/2025
Keetch, ChadIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2011
Monks, ChandlerIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE03/01/2024
Peterson, ForrestIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2019
Port, BarryIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE07/26/2018
Sato, AmiIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE09/09/2024
Uy, MariettaIndividualManaging Control - Governing BodyNOT APPLICABLE05/09/2016
Uy, MariettaIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE05/09/2016
Uy, MariettaIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE05/09/2016

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Sante of Chandler0.4 miChandler, AZ★★★★★4/5
Archstone Care Center0.4 miChandler, AZ★★★★★4/5
Desert Cove Nursing Center0.6 miChandler, AZ★★☆☆☆1/5abuse
River Park Post Acute3.3 miChandler, AZ★★★★★4/5
Tempe Post Acute5.6 miTempe, AZ★★★★★5/5
Ahwatukee Post Acute6.4 miPhoenix, AZ★★★☆☆3/5
Friendship Village of Tempe6.6 miTempe, AZ★★★☆☆4/5
Wellsprings of Gilbert7.5 miGilbert, AZ★★★★★5/5
The Center at Val Vista, LLC7.6 miGilbert, AZ★★★★★5/5
Mirabella at Asu9.3 miTempe, AZ★★★☆☆3/5
Sandridge Post Acute9.8 miMesa, AZ★★★☆☆2/5
Citrus Heights Respiratory and Rehabilitation10.3 miMesa, AZ★★★☆☆2/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Chandler →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 035101.