How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
1351 Old Freehold Road, Toms River, NJ 08753 (opens Google Maps) · Ocean County · (732) 240-0090· 120 certified beds · avg 106 residents/day · certified since Jul 28, 1988 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: COMPLETE CARE (85 facilities, chain avg rating 3.1★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 17 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. F-0760
The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. F-0657
The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint F-0677
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · F-0760 |
| Nov 17, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Nov 17, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677 |
| Nov 17, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide appropriate care related to bladder and bowel needs — including care for residents who use catheters and steps to prevent urinary tract infections. · F-0690 |
| Nov 17, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Nov 17, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Nov 17, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Aug 25, 2025 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint · F-0658 |
| Aug 25, 2025 | B · Potential for minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint · F-0677 |
| Oct 21, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow. · from a complaint · F-0658 |
| Oct 21, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Oct 21, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Oct 21, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not arrange hospice services for a resident who needed them, or help the resident move to a facility that could arrange hospice. Hospice provides comfort-focused care for people nearing the end of life. · F-0849 |
| May 21, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. · F-0644 |
| May 21, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. · F-0645 |
| May 21, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| May 21, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (4 → 7).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 4 | 0 | D |
| 2024 | 4 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 9 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New Jersey avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.99 | 3.88 | 3.95 | bottom 6% in New Jersey; bottom 14% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.32 | 0.67 | 0.69 | bottom 9% in New Jersey; bottom 12% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.82 | 3.53 | 3.50 | bottom 11% in New Jersey; bottom 22% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.25 | 0.50 | 0.48 | bottom 20% in New Jersey; bottom 22% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 50.6 | 39.7 | 45.8 | bottom 22% in New Jersey; bottom 35% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 25.0 | 37.7 | 42.9 | top 25% in New Jersey; top 20% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.19, RN 0.34, weekend 3.01.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.19 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 1/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Complete Care at Bey Lea, LLC. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Corporation
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CC Bey Lea Management LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 53% | 06/13/2018 |
| Eef Capital LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 48% | 06/13/2018 |
| Peace Capital LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 53% | 06/13/2018 |
| Schlaff, Benny | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 24% | 06/13/2018 |
| Schlaff, Nachum | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 24% | 06/13/2018 |
| Bey Lea Property LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/13/2018 |
| Eef Capital LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/13/2018 |
| Hoch, Robert | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/13/2018 |
| Hoch, Robert | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/13/2018 |
| HP Intermediate Administrative Services LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/13/2018 |
| Issa, Mousa | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/13/2018 |
| Lapides, Meir | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/01/2018 |
| Lapides, Meir | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/13/2018 |
| Mercado, Wanda | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/13/2018 |
| Mercado, Wanda | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/13/2018 |
| Morelos, Joseph | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/13/2018 |
| Morelos, Joseph | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/13/2018 |
| Peace Capital LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/13/2018 |
| Schlaff, Benny | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/13/2018 |
| Schlaff, Nachum | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/13/2018 |
Showing 20 of 24 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 4 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Complete Care — 85 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 84 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rose Garden Nursing and Rehabilitation Center | 0.9 mi | Toms River, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | abuse |
| Hampton Ridge Healthcare and Rehabilitation | 2.0 mi | Toms River, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Childrens Specialized Hospital Toms River | 2.0 mi | Toms River, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Community Medical Center Tcu | 2.4 mi | Toms River, NJ | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Complete Care at Green Acres | 2.7 mi | Toms River, NJ | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Complete Care at Holiday City | 2.8 mi | Toms River, NJ | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Complete Care at Shorrock | 3.2 mi | Brick, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Harrogate Village | 4.0 mi | Lakewood, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Shore Gardens Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 4.0 mi | Toms River, NJ | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Complete Care at Arbors | 4.0 mi | Toms River, NJ | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Leisure Chateau Rehabilitation | 5.1 mi | Lakewood, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Aristacare at Manchester LLC | 5.8 mi | Manchester, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in Ocean, NJ — 32 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 315264.
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details