How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Westchester Gardens Health & Rehabilitation
3301 N McMullen Booth Rd, Clearwater, FL 33761 (opens Google Maps) · Pinellas County · (727) 785-8335· 120 certified beds · avg 110 residents/day · certified since Sep 19, 1989 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: THE GOODMAN GROUP (9 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)
3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
inspected Jun 5, 2025
0
Serious findings on record
$0
Fines, last 3 years
3.89
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)
Every record stays on this page.
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 4/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Inspection findings in the public record
Showing the latest 3 of 14 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint F-0684
The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. F-0842
The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. F-0880
View all 14 inspection findingsShow only the latest 3 findings
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. · from a complaint · F-0684 |
| Jun 5, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · F-0842 |
| Jun 5, 2025 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. · F-0880 |
| Jun 5, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · F-0550 |
| Jun 5, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Jun 5, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · F-0677 |
| Jun 5, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Jun 5, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it. · F-0697 |
| Jun 5, 2025 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Apr 6, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Jun 25, 2021 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. · F-0761 |
| Jun 25, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not give residents (and their representatives and the ombudsman, a state advocate for residents) proper advance notice before a transfer or discharge, including information about their right to appeal. · F-0623 |
| Jun 25, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Jun 25, 2021 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. · F-0759 |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (1 → 8).
All citationsSerious citations (G–L)
2021
All citations: 4
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2023
All citations: 1
Serious citations (G–L): 0
2025
All citations: 9
Serious citations (G–L): 0
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 4 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 1 | 0 | D |
| 2025 | 9 | 0 | E |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
What these staffing numbers mean →
This facilityFlorida averageU.S. average
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)
This facility: 3.89
Florida average: 4.03
U.S. average: 3.95
Registered Nurse hours
This facility: 0.69
Florida average: 0.76
U.S. average: 0.69
Weekend total nurse staffing
This facility: 3.49
Florida average: 3.68
U.S. average: 3.50
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | Florida avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.89 | 4.03 | 3.95 | top 49% in Florida; top 44% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.69 | 0.76 | 0.69 | top 47% in Florida; top 37% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.49 | 3.68 | 3.50 | bottom 46% in Florida; top 42% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.36 | 0.53 | 0.48 | bottom 32% in Florida; bottom 44% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 45.0 | 41.4 | 45.8 | bottom 41% in Florida; bottom 50% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 47.6 | 46.0 | 42.9 | bottom 46% in Florida; bottom 40% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.92, RN 0.70, weekend 3.52.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (3.92 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Quality measures: assessments & claims
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 4/5
Costs & payment
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for Westchester Gardens Health & Rehabilitation. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Calculate a stay from a quote you receive
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Before you compare prices
- Request the room type, effective date and itemized daily rate in writing.
- Ask about therapy, medicines, supplies, care-level charges, deposits, refunds and annual increases.
- Confirm insurance or Medicaid eligibility and bed availability directly; certification alone does not guarantee either.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
Who owns this facility
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benson, Randall | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 9% | 02/28/2017 |
| Beverly N. Grossman Revocable Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 05/01/2015 |
| Grossman, Beverly | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 8% | 05/01/2015 |
| John B. Goodman 2006 Irrv Grantor Tr | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 02/28/2017 |
| John B. Goodman 2006 Irrv Grantor Tr | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 9% | 02/28/2017 |
| Salmen, Thomas | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 9% | 02/28/2017 |
| South Dakota Trust Company, LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 9% | 02/28/2017 |
| The Goodman Group Properties LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 12/31/2006 |
| Weichert, James | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 9% | 02/28/2017 |
| Werner Ventures Limited Partnership | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 11/17/1989 |
| Westchester Gardens Limited Partnership | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | — | 11/17/1989 |
| Wilson, Mark | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 9% | 02/28/2017 |
| Benson, Randall | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/26/2016 |
| Benson, Randall | Individual | General Partnership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/28/2017 |
| Benson, Randall | Individual | Limited Partnership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/28/2017 |
| Beverly N. Grossman Revocable Trust | Organization | Limited Partnership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2015 |
| Edinger, Craig | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 10/21/2016 |
| Grossman, Beverly | Individual | Limited Partnership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/01/2015 |
| Jbge Westchester INC | Organization | General Partnership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 06/17/2003 |
| John B. Goodman 2006 Irrv Grantor Tr | Organization | General Partnership Interest | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/28/2017 |
Showing 20 of 35 parties CMS has on file for this facility; 15 are not displayed. The full list is in the CMS Ownership dataset.
Other facilities in the same chain
CMS lists this facility under the chain The Goodman Group — 9 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
- Riverside Health & Rehabilitation — Missoula, MT · overall 3/5
- The Valley Health and Rehab — Hamilton, MT · overall 2/5
- Village Health & Rehabilitation — Missoula, MT · overall 3/5
- West Hills Health & Rehabilitation — Portland, OR · overall 4/5
- Aspire Transitional Care — Flagstaff, AZ · overall 4/5
- The Peaks Health & Rehabilitation — Flagstaff, AZ · overall 2/5
- Gardens at Terracina Health & Rehabilitation — Naples, FL · overall 5/5
- Sabal Palms Health & Rehabilitation — Largo, FL · overall 2/5
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking.
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "How do you make sure each resident's care follows the doctor's orders, and what changed after this citation?"
- "How do you keep residents' medical records accurate, complete, and secure?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "Can you give me examples of how your staff protect residents' dignity in everyday care, like bathing and dressing?"
- "Can we tour the resident rooms, bathrooms, and common areas today, including areas not on the usual tour route?"
- "How many aides are on each shift, and how do you make sure every resident gets timely help with bathing, dressing, and meals?"
- "How many residents here use oxygen or breathing equipment, and who checks that equipment each shift?"
- "How do you assess and manage residents' pain, especially for those who have trouble communicating?"
Also worth asking anywhere
- "Your weekend nurse staffing is reported below the Florida midpoint — how does the weekend schedule differ from a weekday?"
- "Can I see the plan of correction for the findings in your most recent state inspection?"
- "CMS reports 45% total nursing staff turnover here — who on the care team has been with you longest?"
- "The ownership record on file lists 35 owning or managing parties — who makes the decisions about staffing levels?"
- "Can I visit again unannounced, at a mealtime or on a weekend?"
Nearby facilities (12 closest of 85 within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Palm Garden of Clearwater | 0.5 mi | Clearwater, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Aviata at Countryside | 1.1 mi | Palm Harbor, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Aviata at Oldsmar | 2.3 mi | Oldsmar, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Oakpark Health and Rehabilitation Center | 2.3 mi | Palm Harbor, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Aviata at the Harbor | 2.6 mi | Safety Harbor, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| St Mark Village | 3.1 mi | Palm Harbor, FL | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Regency Oaks Health Center | 3.3 mi | Clearwater, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Aviata at the Palms | 3.7 mi | Palm Harbor, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Lake Haven Nursing and Rehab Center | 3.9 mi | Dunedin, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Aviata at Lakeside Oaks | 4.2 mi | Dunedin, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Meadowpark Health and Rehabilitation Center | 4.5 mi | Dunedin, FL | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Aviata at Sand Key | 4.5 mi | Clearwater, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
Other facilities in the same county
CMS records place this facility in Pinellas, FL — 65 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
- Westminster Suncoast — Saint Petersburg, FL · overall 2/5abuse
- Willowbrooke Court Skilled Care Center at Mease Li — Dunedin, FL · overall 5/5
- Wrights Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center — Seminole, FL · overall 4/5
- Abbey Rehabilitation and Nursing Center — Saint Petersburg, FL · overall 1/5
- Addington Place at College Harbor — Saint Petersburg, FL · overall 5/5
- Advanced Care Center — Clearwater, FL · overall 4/5
- Alhambra Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center — Saint Petersburg, FL · overall 1/5
- Alpine Health and Rehabilitation Center — Saint Petersburg, FL · overall 1/5
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 105654.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).