MontanaMissoula

Riverside Health & Rehabilitation

1301 E Broadway, Missoula, MT 59802 · Missoula County · 72 certified beds · avg 67 residents/day · certified since Dec 13, 1988

Part of chain: THE GOODMAN GROUP (9 facilities, chain avg rating 3.2★)

3/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
1
Serious findings on record
$35,139
Fines, last 3 years
4.11
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★★★☆☆3/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Actual harm, one-off · Jan 15, 2026 · F-0697

The facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.

Why it matters: Untreated pain causes needless suffering and can lead to depression, poor sleep, and declining health.

Severity (G): One or a few residents were actually harmed — physically or emotionally — though not put in immediate danger of serious injury or death.

Corrected: Feb 13, 2026 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (32)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 17, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. · from a complaint
Jun 17, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. · from a complaint
Jun 17, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Jun 17, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not respond appropriately to alleged violations, such as reports of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment. Facilities must investigate every allegation and protect residents while they do. · from a complaint
Jan 15, 2026▲ G · Actual harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate pain management for a resident who needed it.
Jan 15, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility's menus did not meet residents' nutritional needs, or were not prepared in advance, followed as written, kept up to date, or reviewed by a dietician.
Jan 15, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Jan 15, 2026F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Jan 15, 2026E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs.
Jan 15, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint
Jan 15, 2026D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Mar 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · from a complaint
Mar 25, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. · from a complaint
Nov 7, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights. · from a complaint
Nov 7, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly.
Nov 7, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide or arrange dental services for its residents. Nursing homes are responsible for making sure residents can get dental care.
Nov 7, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have a working call system — the button or cord residents use to summon help — in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
Nov 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not make reasonable adjustments to fit each resident's individual needs and preferences — things like call buttons within reach, preferred wake-up times, or accessible room setups.
Nov 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not accurately assess a resident's health and needs. Assessments are the foundation for all the care a resident receives.
Nov 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable.
Nov 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Nov 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required.
Nov 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not help a resident get vision and hearing services — such as eye exams, glasses, hearing tests, or hearing aids.
Nov 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Nov 7, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide special eating equipment and utensils — like adaptive cups or easy-grip silverware — for residents who need them, along with appropriate help at meals.
Nov 7, 2024B · Minimal risk, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to manage their own money and financial affairs.
Nov 20, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly.
Nov 20, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve food and drinks that were appetizing, attractive, and at a safe and pleasant temperature.
Nov 20, 2023E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Nov 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it.
Nov 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock.
Nov 20, 2023D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop and follow policies and procedures for offering residents flu and pneumonia vaccinations.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (13 → 6).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202360E
2024130E
202520D
2026111G ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

1 fine totaling $35,139.

DateTypeAmount / length
Jan 15, 2026Fine$35,139

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityMontana avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)4.114.823.95bottom 41% in Montana; top 35% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.871.170.69bottom 40% in Montana; top 23% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.674.263.50bottom 41% in Montana; top 34% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.510.710.48bottom 35% in Montana; top 32% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)62.854.845.8bottom 23% in Montana; bottom 12% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)53.348.342.9bottom 45% in Montana; bottom 31% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.99, RN 0.85, weekend 3.57. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 4/5 · long-stay residents: 4/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Partnership

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
Benson, RandallIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10%02/28/2017
Caron CorporationOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest11/01/1988
JBGRS INCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest01/01/1996
John B. Goodman 2006 Irrv Grantor TrOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest25%02/28/2017
Riverside Health Care CenterOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest09/04/1987
Salmen, ThomasIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10%02/28/2017
Weichert, JamesIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10%02/28/2017
Wilson, MarkIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest10%02/28/2017
Benson, RandallIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE06/26/2015
Benson, RandallIndividualGeneral Partnership InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2017
Caron CorporationOrganizationGeneral Partnership InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/01/1998
Edinger, CraigIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/21/2016
JBGRS INCOrganizationGeneral Partnership InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/14/2010
John B. Goodman 2006 Irrv Grantor TrOrganizationGeneral Partnership InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2017
Knacke, ClintonIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/12/2022
Olson, DeniseIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE09/16/2013
Salmen, ThomasIndividualGeneral Partnership InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2017
Waylett, AnnieIndividualW-2 Managing EmployeeNOT APPLICABLE12/04/2020
Weichert, JamesIndividualCorporate DirectorNOT APPLICABLE03/30/2017
Weichert, JamesIndividualGeneral Partnership InterestNOT APPLICABLE02/28/2017

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Missoula Health & Rehabilitation Center2.0 miMissoula, MT★★★★☆4/5
Village Health & Rehabilitation3.5 miMissoula, MT★★★☆☆3/5

Compare this facility with the 2 closest →

All facilities in Missoula →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 275126.