Oakpark Health and Rehabilitation Center
2851 Tampa Rd, Palm Harbor, FL 34684 · Pinellas County · 180 certified beds · avg 169 residents/day · certified since Dec 1, 1990
Part of chain: ASTON HEALTH (38 facilities, chain avg rating 2.7★)
What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)
Health inspection rating: ★★☆☆☆2/5 · CMS overall rating: 3/5
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.
All citations in the current public record (23)
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2026 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide appropriate treatment and services to residents with a mental health condition, difficulty adjusting emotionally, or a history of trauma or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). · from a complaint |
| Dec 11, 2025 | F · Potential for harm, facility-wide | The facility did not electronically submit complete and accurate staffing information to the government, based on payroll and other verifiable records. · from a complaint |
| Dec 11, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving. |
| Dec 11, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint |
| Dec 11, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. |
| Dec 11, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Dec 11, 2025 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not keep all essential equipment working safely — things like heating and cooling systems, kitchen equipment, and medical devices. |
| Dec 11, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not treat residents with respect and dignity, or did not let them keep and use their own personal belongings. |
| Dec 11, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not immediately notify the resident, their doctor, and a family member when something significant happened — such as an injury, a decline in health, or a room change. Families and doctors are entitled to know right away. |
| Dec 11, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. |
| Dec 11, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services. |
| Dec 11, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide the help residents need with basic daily activities — like bathing, dressing, eating, and using the bathroom — for residents who cannot do these things on their own. |
| Dec 11, 2025 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals. |
| Aug 2, 2023 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care. |
| Aug 2, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not coordinate resident assessments with the state's pre-admission screening program for mental illness and intellectual disabilities, or failed to refer residents for the special services they need. |
| Aug 2, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility allowed residents to lose the ability to do daily activities — like bathing, dressing, and eating — when there was no medical reason for the decline. Good care helps residents keep the abilities they have. |
| Aug 2, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not try to gradually reduce doses of mood- and mind-altering medications or use non-drug approaches first, as required, or used 'as needed' psychiatric drugs without proper limits. |
| Aug 2, 2023 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. |
| Aug 13, 2021 | E · Potential for harm, repeated | The facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide. |
| Aug 13, 2021 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. |
| Aug 13, 2021 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility's medication error rate was 5 percent or higher — meaning too many doses were given incorrectly, such as the wrong drug, dose, or time. |
| Aug 13, 2021 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not label drugs according to professional standards or did not store them in locked compartments, with controlled drugs (medications with a high risk of misuse) kept under a separate lock. |
| Aug 13, 2021 | D · Potential for harm, one-off | The facility did not provide each resident with a nourishing, tasty, well-balanced diet that meets their daily nutritional and special dietary needs. |
Inspection trend by year
Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (5 → 12).
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 5 | 0 | E |
| 2023 | 5 | 0 | E |
| 2025 | 12 | 0 | F |
| 2026 | 1 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)
| Measure | This facility | Florida avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 3.51 | 4.03 | 3.95 | bottom 17% in Florida; bottom 37% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.59 | 0.76 | 0.69 | bottom 39% in Florida; top 49% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 3.26 | 3.68 | 3.50 | bottom 18% in Florida; bottom 45% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.47 | 0.53 | 0.48 | top 46% in Florida; top 37% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 55.8 | 41.4 | 45.8 | bottom 16% in Florida; bottom 23% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 65.7 | 46.0 | 42.9 | bottom 16% in Florida; bottom 15% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.41, RN 0.58, weekend 3.16. Staffing rating: 3/5.
Self-reported quality measures
Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 3/5
Who owns this facility
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BP Oakpark Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 50% | 05/05/2023 |
| LF Oakpark Trust | Organization | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 50% | 05/05/2023 |
| Oakpark Rehab Holdings LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 100% | 01/04/2023 |
| Aston Healthcare LLC | Organization | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/05/2023 |
| Berard, Lori | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/06/2024 |
| Dilella, Vincent | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/06/2023 |
| Dilella, Vincent | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 09/18/2025 |
| Ferrone, Karen | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 04/02/2024 |
| Reynard-Suriano, Su | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 05/05/2023 |
| Reynard-Suriano, Su | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 12/09/2025 |
| Wildes, Donna | Individual | Corporate Officer | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/28/2025 |
| Wildes, Donna | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/28/2025 |
| Wildes, Donna | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/28/2025 |
Questions to ask on your visit
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
- "What mental health services do you offer on-site, and how do you care for residents with depression, anxiety, or a history of trauma?"
- "How do your actual daily staffing levels compare to what's reported on Medicare's Care Compare website?"
- "How do you prevent bedsores for residents who can't move themselves, and how often are at-risk residents repositioned?"
- "What is your falls rate, and what specific steps do you take to prevent falls and supervise residents at risk?"
- "What is your nurse and aide staffing ratio on each shift, including nights and weekends?"
- "Who leads your infection prevention program, and how do you make sure staff follow practices like hand hygiene every day?"
- "How do you inspect and maintain essential equipment, and how quickly are repairs made?"
- "How do you train staff to treat residents with dignity, and how do you protect residents' personal belongings?"
- "What is your current ratio of nursing staff to residents on day, evening, and weekend shifts?"
- "Can I see the results and plan of correction from your most recent state inspection?"
Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| St Mark Village | 0.8 mi | Palm Harbor, FL | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Aviata at Countryside | 1.3 mi | Palm Harbor, FL | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Aviata at the Palms | 1.4 mi | Palm Harbor, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| Palm Garden of Clearwater | 1.9 mi | Clearwater, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Westchester Gardens Health & Rehabilitation | 2.3 mi | Clearwater, FL | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Lake Haven Nursing and Rehab Center | 3.8 mi | Dunedin, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Aviata at Oldsmar | 4.1 mi | Oldsmar, FL | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Aviata at Lakeside Oaks | 4.5 mi | Dunedin, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Meadowpark Health and Rehabilitation Center | 4.5 mi | Dunedin, FL | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| Willowbrooke Court Skilled Care Center at Mease Li | 4.7 mi | Dunedin, FL | ★★★★★ | 5/5 | |
| Aviata at the Harbor | 4.8 mi | Safety Harbor, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Regency Oaks Health Center | 4.9 mi | Clearwater, FL | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
All facilities in Palm Harbor →
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 105708.