FloridaClearwater

Palm Garden of Clearwater

3480 McMullen Booth Rd, Clearwater, FL 33761 · Pinellas County · 165 certified beds · avg 160 residents/day · certified since Sep 18, 1987

Part of chain: PALM GARDEN HEALTH AND REHABILITATION (14 facilities, chain avg rating 3.1★)

1/5
Health inspection rating (on-site)
4
Serious findings on record
$17,345
Fines, last 3 years
3.76
Nurse hours/resident/day (adjusted)

What health inspectors found (on-site government inspections — the most independent evidence available)

Health inspection rating: ★☆☆☆☆1/5 · CMS overall rating: 2/5

The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and self-reported quality measures.

Most serious findings (actual harm or immediate jeopardy)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Jun 10, 2026 · F-0578 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care.

Why it matters: Ignoring these rights means residents may receive treatments they refused, or miss having their end-of-life wishes respected.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: May 18, 2026 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, one-off · Jun 10, 2026 · F-0726 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident.

Why it matters: Undertrained caregivers are more likely to miss warning signs and make care mistakes.

Severity (J): Inspectors found a situation that put a resident's life or safety in immediate danger, affecting one or a few residents. The facility must fix it immediately — these citations often come with large fines.

Corrected: May 18, 2026 (Past Non-Compliance)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Aug 8, 2025 · F-0656 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.

Why it matters: Without a complete, working care plan, important needs can slip through the cracks and no one is accountable for results.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: Sep 2, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

▲ Immediate jeopardy, repeated · Aug 8, 2025 · F-0689 · triggered by a complaint

The facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.

Why it matters: This is one of the most common citations and directly relates to falls and injuries, which can be devastating for older adults.

Severity (K): A life-threatening or extremely dangerous situation affected several residents. Among the most serious findings an inspection can produce.

Corrected: Sep 2, 2025 (Deficient, Provider has date of correction)

All citations in the current public record (25)

CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed.

DateSeverityWhat the facility was cited for
Jun 10, 2026▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' rights to request, refuse, or stop treatment, to decline participation in medical research, or to make an advance directive — a written statement of their wishes for future medical care. · from a complaint
Jun 10, 2026▲ J · Immediate jeopardy, one-offThe facility did not make sure its nurses and nurse aides had the skills and training needed to properly care for every resident. · from a complaint
Aug 8, 2025▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Aug 8, 2025▲ K · Immediate jeopardy, repeatedThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls. · from a complaint
Feb 6, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not properly complete the required screening (called PASARR) that identifies whether a person entering a nursing home has a mental illness or intellectual disability and needs specialized services.
Feb 6, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not have enough nursing staff each day to meet every resident's needs, or did not have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift. Adequate staffing is one of the strongest predictors of good care.
Feb 6, 2025F · Potential for harm, facility-wideThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Feb 6, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not treat residents with dignity and respect, or did not honor their rights to make their own decisions and communicate freely. This is one of the most fundamental resident rights.
Feb 6, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not provide treatment and care that follows the doctor's orders and matches the resident's own preferences and goals.
Feb 6, 2025E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not serve meals and snacks at times that fit residents' needs, preferences, and requests, or did not offer nourishing alternatives for residents who want to eat outside scheduled meal times.
Feb 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly.
Feb 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide proper care for pressure ulcers (bedsores) or did not do enough to prevent new ones from forming. Bedsores develop when residents stay in one position too long without help moving.
Feb 6, 2025D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline.
Apr 11, 2024E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards. · from a complaint
Apr 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · from a complaint
Apr 11, 2024D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · from a complaint
Dec 15, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards.
Dec 15, 2022E · Potential for harm, repeatedThe facility did not have or follow an effective program to prevent and control infections — such as proper hand washing, cleaning, and isolation practices. This is the most commonly cited deficiency nationwide.
Dec 15, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not allow residents to take their own medications when a clinical review showed they could do so safely. Residents have this right if their care team determines it's appropriate.
Dec 15, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not honor residents' right to voice complaints without discrimination or retaliation, or did not have a working complaint process that resolves issues promptly.
Dec 15, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility provided care that did not meet professional standards of quality — the accepted standards that nurses and other clinicians are expected to follow.
Dec 15, 2022D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep the environment free of accident hazards, or did not provide enough supervision to prevent accidents like falls.
Apr 9, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines.
Apr 9, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not protect residents' personal information or did not keep complete, accurate medical records that meet professional standards.
Apr 9, 2021D · Potential for harm, one-offThe facility did not keep its building and grounds safe, functional, clean, and comfortable for residents, staff, and visitors.

Inspection trend by year

Citations from standard inspections increased between the last two inspection cycles (6 → 9).

YearCitationsSerious (G–L)Worst severity that year
202130D
202260E
202430E
2025112K ▲
202622J ▲

Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.

Fines and enforcement (last 3 years)

2 fines totaling $17,345.

DateTypeAmount / length
Aug 8, 2025Fine$8,672
Aug 8, 2025Fine$8,673

Nurse staffing (from payroll records, adjusted for how much care residents need)

MeasureThis facilityFlorida avgU.S. avgWhere it stands
Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day)3.764.033.95bottom 38% in Florida; bottom 49% in the U.S.
Registered Nurse hours0.820.760.69top 33% in Florida; top 26% in the U.S.
Weekend total nurse staffing3.453.683.50bottom 40% in Florida; top 45% in the U.S.
Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted)0.660.530.48top 24% in Florida; top 19% in the U.S.
Total nursing staff turnover (%)51.441.445.8bottom 24% in Florida; bottom 33% in the U.S.
RN turnover (%)37.546.042.9top 33% in Florida; top 42% in the U.S.

Hours are per resident per day, case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 3.59, RN 0.78, weekend 3.30. Staffing rating: 4/5.

Self-reported quality measures

Note: these ratings are based on data the facility reports about itself to CMS. They are not independently verified by inspectors, and can look better than inspection findings. Give more weight to the inspection results above.

Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5

Who owns this facility

For profit - Corporation

Owner / managerTypeRoleStakeSince
James O. McCarver Qtip Business Marital Trust U/A Dated June 22, 2001,Organization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest12/23/2014
James O. McCarver Residuary Trust Share U/A Dated 06/22/2001Organization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest12/23/2014
McCarver, PatsyIndividual5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest11/01/2013
Palm Garden Healthcare Holdings, LLCOrganization5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest50%11/01/2013
Patsy E. McCarver Trust U/A Dated June 22, 2001 as Amended, Patsy EOrganization5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest11/01/2013
Bomberger, JeffreyIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE10/01/2014
Chalmers, JamesIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2015
Greene, RobertIndividualCorporate OfficerNOT APPLICABLE01/01/2014
Hill, SandraIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE08/16/2016
Hill, SandraIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE02/21/2025
James O. McCarver Qtip Business Marital Trust U/A Dated June 22, 2001,OrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2013
Palm Healthcare Management, LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE03/06/2025
Patsy E. McCarver Trust U/A Dated June 22, 2001 as Amended, Patsy EOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2013
Pgcle Re LLCOrganization5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE07/29/2024
Pgcle Re LLCOrganizationADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE07/29/2024
Ray, ScottIndividualOperational/Managerial ControlNOT APPLICABLE01/21/2014
Ray, ScottIndividualADP of the SNFNOT APPLICABLE01/21/2014
Regions BankOrganization5% or Greater Mortgage InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2013
Regions BankOrganization5% or Greater Security InterestNOT APPLICABLE11/01/2013

Questions to ask on your visit

Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.

Nearby facilities (within 20 miles)

FacilityDistanceCityOverallInspectionFlags
Westchester Gardens Health & Rehabilitation0.5 miClearwater, FL★★★★☆3/5
Aviata at Countryside0.7 miPalm Harbor, FL★★★☆☆3/5
Oakpark Health and Rehabilitation Center1.9 miPalm Harbor, FL★★★☆☆2/5
Aviata at Oldsmar2.3 miOldsmar, FL★☆☆☆☆1/5
St Mark Village2.7 miPalm Harbor, FL★★★★★5/5
Aviata at the Harbor3.0 miSafety Harbor, FL★★☆☆☆2/5
Aviata at the Palms3.2 miPalm Harbor, FL★☆☆☆☆1/5abuse
Regency Oaks Health Center3.7 miClearwater, FL★★☆☆☆1/5
Lake Haven Nursing and Rehab Center4.1 miDunedin, FL★☆☆☆☆1/5
Aviata at Lakeside Oaks4.5 miDunedin, FL★★☆☆☆2/5
Meadowpark Health and Rehabilitation Center4.7 miDunedin, FL★★★★☆3/5
Aviata at Sand Key4.9 miClearwater, FL★★☆☆☆1/5

Compare this facility with the 3 closest →

All facilities in Clearwater →

Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 105581.