How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
150 Riverside Drive, New York, NY 10024 (opens Google Maps) · New York County · (646) 505-3500· 520 certified beds · avg 493 residents/day · certified since Sep 19, 1971 · Medicare and Medicaid certified
Certified for both programmes. Certification means the facility can bill Medicaid — it does not mean a Medicaid-funded bed is free right now, so ask directly. Who pays for nursing home care →
Part of chain: CARERITE CENTERS (34 facilities, chain avg rating 3.6★)
New to these records? How to read an inspection report →
Health inspection rating: ★★★★☆4/5 · CMS overall rating: 5/5 · how star ratings work →
The health inspection star above is graded on a curve within each state — a set share of each state's facilities gets each star level — so a facility can have few citations and still rate 2–3 stars if others in its state did even better. The overall rating combines that inspection score with staffing and quality measures from resident assessments and claims.
Showing the latest 3 of 16 inspection findings. Open the full record below to read every finding.
The facility did not let a resident help develop and carry out their own plan of care — the written roadmap of the services and support they'll receive, built around their personal goals and preferences. F-0553
The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. F-0656
The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. F-0679
CMS publishes roughly the last three inspection cycles plus recent complaint investigations. Older surveys drop out of the record as new ones are completed — that window is CMS's, not ours. Within it, every citation CMS publishes for this facility is listed here: none excluded.
| Date | Severity | What the facility was cited for |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not let a resident help develop and carry out their own plan of care — the written roadmap of the services and support they'll receive, built around their personal goals and preferences. · F-0553 |
| Nov 20, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop or follow a complete care plan for each resident — the written roadmap covering all of a resident's needs, with measurable goals and timelines. · F-0656 |
| Nov 20, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide activities that meet residents' needs and interests. Nursing homes must offer meaningful activity programs, not just leave residents idle. · F-0679 |
| Nov 20, 2024 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not protect residents from abuse or neglect. This covers physical, mental, and sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect, by anyone — staff, other residents, or visitors. · from a complaint · F-0600 |
| Feb 22, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
| Feb 22, 2023 | E · Potential for more than minimal harm, pattern | The facility did not maintain an effective pest control program to prevent or deal with mice, insects, or other pests. · F-0925 |
| Feb 22, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, including safe support for residents' daily living needs. · F-0584 |
| Feb 22, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft to the proper authorities quickly enough, or did not report the results of its investigation. · F-0609 |
| Feb 22, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not create and follow a basic care plan covering a new resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of admission. The first days are when a new resident is most vulnerable. · F-0655 |
| Feb 22, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not develop a resident's complete plan of care within 7 days of the full assessment, or the plan wasn't prepared, reviewed, and updated by a team of health professionals as required. · F-0657 |
| Feb 22, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide the care needed to maintain or improve residents' movement and flexibility — such as range-of-motion exercises — leading to avoidable decline. · F-0688 |
| Feb 22, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide safe and appropriate respiratory care — such as oxygen, breathing treatments, or care for residents on breathing equipment — for residents who needed it. · F-0695 |
| Feb 22, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not make sure residents actually saw their doctor face-to-face at all required visits. Doctors must examine nursing home residents in person on a regular schedule. · F-0712 |
| Feb 22, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not provide pharmacy services that meet each resident's needs, or did not employ or contract with a licensed pharmacist. · F-0755 |
| Feb 22, 2023 | D · Potential for more than minimal harm, isolated | The facility did not keep residents free from significant medication errors — such as giving the wrong drug, the wrong dose, or missing a critical medication. · F-0760 |
| Nov 9, 2020 | F · Potential for more than minimal harm, widespread | The facility did not get its food from approved, safe sources, or did not store, prepare, and serve food according to professional food safety standards. · F-0812 |
Citations from standard inspections decreased between the last two inspection cycles (11 → 3).
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Year | Citations | Serious (G–L) | Worst severity that year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 1 | 0 | F |
| 2023 | 11 | 0 | E |
| 2024 | 4 | 0 | D |
Counts reflect the current CMS public record (~3 inspection cycles plus complaint investigations); years with no surveys show no row. Inspection frequency varies, so compare severity as well as counts.
How to file a complaint about care →
No fines or payment denials in the published 3-year window.
What these staffing numbers mean →
All bars start at zero. Exact values and supporting details remain below.
| Measure | This facility | New York avg | U.S. avg | Where it stands |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total nurse staffing (hours per resident per day) | 2.61 | 3.58 | 3.95 | bottom 6% in New York; bottom 5% in the U.S. |
| Registered Nurse hours | 0.47 | 0.68 | 0.69 | bottom 28% in New York; bottom 33% in the U.S. |
| Weekend total nurse staffing | 2.39 | 3.13 | 3.50 | bottom 9% in New York; bottom 7% in the U.S. |
| Weekend RN hours (not acuity-adjusted) | 0.33 | 0.48 | 0.48 | bottom 45% in New York; bottom 38% in the U.S. |
| Total nursing staff turnover (%) | 34.3 | 40.3 | 45.8 | top 40% in New York; top 22% in the U.S. |
| RN turnover (%) | 25.5 | 39.8 | 42.9 | top 21% in New York; top 23% in the U.S. |
Hours are per resident per day for the most recent quarter of payroll data in this CMS release (2026-08-01) — the same quarter for every facility — case-mix adjusted by CMS so facilities caring for sicker residents can be compared fairly (same basis as the CMS staffing star). "Top X%" means better than most facilities: more staffing hours, or lower turnover. Raw (unadjusted) reported hours: total 2.92, RN 0.52, weekend 2.67.Comparing with Medicare Care Compare? Care Compare shows the raw figure (2.92 here, displayed there as hours and minutes), not the adjusted one above. Both are correct; they answer different questions. Staffing rating: 2/5.
Note: CMS combines facility-reported resident assessments (MDS) with claims-based measures. These are different sources from on-site inspection findings. Read the measures alongside inspection and staffing records; a high QM rating does not establish that a home is safe.
Quality measures rating: 5/5 · long-stay residents: 5/5 · short-stay residents: 5/5
Price evidence · separate from quality
No verified facility-specific private-pay price is available in our data for The Riverside. CMS inspection and staffing records do not tell us what this home will charge you.
Use a written private-pay quote. This worksheet adds only the amounts you enter; it does not calculate Medicare, Medicaid or insurance benefits.
Formula: (room rate + daily extras) × days + one-time charges. A 30-day scenario is not a calendar-month quote. Refundable deposits, rate changes and charges you omit are not automatically included. Entries are not saved or sent to our server.
Understand who pays for care · How we handle price evidence · Report an incorrect price
How to read ownership records →
Ownership records as published by CMS on 2026-08-01. CMS records when an owner joined but not when they left. Listed here and no longer involved? Tell us →
For profit - Limited Liability company
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Stake | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 150 Riverside Management Group LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 21% | 08/23/2013 |
| 150 RSD Ventures LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 59% | 08/23/2013 |
| DJ River Op. LLC | Organization | 5% or Greater Direct Ownership Interest | 19% | 08/23/2013 |
| Einhorn, Sharon | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 10% | 08/28/2013 |
| Eisenstadt, Jay | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 10% | 08/28/2013 |
| Friedman, Devorah | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 10% | 08/28/2013 |
| Penson, Shanon | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 59% | 08/28/2013 |
| Scharf, Helene | Individual | 5% or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest | 10% | 08/28/2013 |
| Einhorn, Sharon | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/28/2013 |
| Friedman, Devorah | Individual | Managing Control - Governing Body | NOT APPLICABLE | 08/28/2013 |
| Glenn, Christopher | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/07/2015 |
| Glenn, Christopher | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 07/07/2015 |
| Morgan, Caroll | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/24/2014 |
| Morgan, Caroll | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/24/2014 |
| Muskin, Daniel | Individual | Operational/Managerial Control | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/26/2023 |
| Muskin, Daniel | Individual | ADP of the SNF | NOT APPLICABLE | 02/26/2023 |
All 16 owning or managing parties CMS has on file are shown — none excluded.
CMS lists this facility under the chain Carerite Centers — 34 facilities in the current records. Chain membership says who operates these homes. It says nothing about how any individual one of them was inspected; each has its own record.
Listed by state, then facility name — not a ranking. Showing 8 of the 33 others, continuing from this facility's own place in that list.
Generated from this facility's actual citation record — bring them to a tour and ask the administrator directly.
| Facility | Distance | City | Overall | Inspection | Flags |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Complete Care at Harborage LLC | 1.0 mi | North Bergen, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 1/5 | abuse |
| The New Jewish Home, Manhattan | 1.1 mi | New York, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Hudsonview Health Care Center | 1.3 mi | North Bergen, NJ | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Amsterdam Nursing Home Corp (1992) | 1.3 mi | New York, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Upper East Side Rehabilitation and Nursing Center | 1.3 mi | New York City, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Terence Cardinal Cooke Health Care Center | 1.5 mi | New York, NY | ★★★★☆ | 3/5 | |
| St Mary's Center INC | 2.1 mi | New York, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Harbour View Senior Living Corp | 2.1 mi | North Bergen, NJ | ★★☆☆☆ | 2/5 | |
| Mary Manning Walsh Nursing Home Co INC | 2.2 mi | New York, NY | ★★★★★ | 4/5 | |
| Henry J. Carter Skilled Nursing Facility | 2.3 mi | Manhattan, NY | ★★★☆☆ | 3/5 | |
| Northern Manhattan Rehabilitation and Nursing Cent | 2.4 mi | New York, NY | ★☆☆☆☆ | 1/5 | |
| Coler Rehabilitation and Nursing Care Center | 2.8 mi | Roosevelt Island, NY | ★★★★★ | 5/5 |
Compare this facility with the 3 closest →
CMS records place this facility in New York, NY — 17 certified facilities there. These are outside the 20-mile list above, or far enough down it not to appear.
Listed by facility name — not a ranking. Homes already in the table above are not repeated here.
Facility data as of CMS processing date 2026-08-01. CCN 335334.
This page is the printable visit checklist. If your browser did not open the print dialog automatically, use File → Print (Ctrl/⌘-P).
May we use Google Analytics cookies to measure visits and pages viewed? Optional — every feature works without them. Privacy details